联合国气候变化谈判:与每年一样的程序?不完全是!

Q3 Social Sciences
C. Bausch, M. Mehling
{"title":"联合国气候变化谈判:与每年一样的程序?不完全是!","authors":"C. Bausch, M. Mehling","doi":"10.21552/CCLR/2017/3/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2007, Heads of State of eight major industrialised nations affirmed that the United Nations will remain ‘the appropriate forum for negotiating future global action on climate change.’ Within the U.N., however, a number of concurrent ‘tracks’ emerged for negotiations and discussions, accompanied by a certain degree of overlap and giving rise to questions on the mandate, scope, and limitations of each track as a pathway to a future climate regime. This article provides a retrospective on ten years of climate negotiations under the U.N., and traces important milestones and trends.","PeriodicalId":52307,"journal":{"name":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"179-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negotiating climate change in the UN: same procedure as every year? Not quite!\",\"authors\":\"C. Bausch, M. Mehling\",\"doi\":\"10.21552/CCLR/2017/3/4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2007, Heads of State of eight major industrialised nations affirmed that the United Nations will remain ‘the appropriate forum for negotiating future global action on climate change.’ Within the U.N., however, a number of concurrent ‘tracks’ emerged for negotiations and discussions, accompanied by a certain degree of overlap and giving rise to questions on the mandate, scope, and limitations of each track as a pathway to a future climate regime. This article provides a retrospective on ten years of climate negotiations under the U.N., and traces important milestones and trends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon and Climate Law Review\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"179-183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon and Climate Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21552/CCLR/2017/3/4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/CCLR/2017/3/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2007年,八个主要工业化国家的国家元首确认,联合国将继续是“谈判未来全球气候变化行动的适当论坛”然而,在联合国内部,出现了许多同时进行谈判和讨论的“轨道”,伴随着一定程度的重叠,并引发了对每个轨道作为通往未来气候制度的途径的任务、范围和局限性的质疑。本文回顾了联合国气候谈判的十年,并追溯了重要的里程碑和趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Negotiating climate change in the UN: same procedure as every year? Not quite!
In 2007, Heads of State of eight major industrialised nations affirmed that the United Nations will remain ‘the appropriate forum for negotiating future global action on climate change.’ Within the U.N., however, a number of concurrent ‘tracks’ emerged for negotiations and discussions, accompanied by a certain degree of overlap and giving rise to questions on the mandate, scope, and limitations of each track as a pathway to a future climate regime. This article provides a retrospective on ten years of climate negotiations under the U.N., and traces important milestones and trends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon and Climate Law Review
Carbon and Climate Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信