汽车工业安全关键绩效指标的优先排序与评估

Q4 Social Sciences
Sigurnost Pub Date : 2021-12-28 DOI:10.31306/s.63.4.1
S. Vosoughi, Fakhradin Ahmadi Kanrash, Asghar Noran Anbardan, I. Alimohammadi, J. Abolghasemi, R. Yarahmadi, M. Chalak
{"title":"汽车工业安全关键绩效指标的优先排序与评估","authors":"S. Vosoughi, Fakhradin Ahmadi Kanrash, Asghar Noran Anbardan, I. Alimohammadi, J. Abolghasemi, R. Yarahmadi, M. Chalak","doi":"10.31306/s.63.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of any management system needs to be monitored with adequate and proper indicators.\nThis study aimed to identify, set priorities and assess key indicators for implementing an effective performance evaluation system. This descriptive-analytical study was carried out in three phase. In first phase, a semi-structured interview as well as a review of the company's documentation and studies carried out, then a set of key indicators were collected and selected. The validity of the indicators were determined by experts (N = 11) and indicators were prioritized using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) according to SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time- bound) criteria.\nFollowing the study framework, a primary set of 60 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were collected. The results of the validity assessment showed 23 indicators had acceptable validity. The results of examining the relationships between the indicators showed that the percentage of corrected non- compliance and the number of risk assessments had a significant relationships with the total number of work-related lost time injuries as a lagging indicator.\nAccording to the results, the four the most important key performance indicators to assess the safety performance in the automotive industry were as follows: the number of risk assessments conducted, the percentage of corrected non- compliance, the percentage of safety educational programs implemented for workers, and Frequency Severity Index (FSI) index.","PeriodicalId":53654,"journal":{"name":"Sigurnost","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritization and assessment of safety key performance indicators in an automotive industry\",\"authors\":\"S. Vosoughi, Fakhradin Ahmadi Kanrash, Asghar Noran Anbardan, I. Alimohammadi, J. Abolghasemi, R. Yarahmadi, M. Chalak\",\"doi\":\"10.31306/s.63.4.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The performance of any management system needs to be monitored with adequate and proper indicators.\\nThis study aimed to identify, set priorities and assess key indicators for implementing an effective performance evaluation system. This descriptive-analytical study was carried out in three phase. In first phase, a semi-structured interview as well as a review of the company's documentation and studies carried out, then a set of key indicators were collected and selected. The validity of the indicators were determined by experts (N = 11) and indicators were prioritized using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) according to SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time- bound) criteria.\\nFollowing the study framework, a primary set of 60 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were collected. The results of the validity assessment showed 23 indicators had acceptable validity. The results of examining the relationships between the indicators showed that the percentage of corrected non- compliance and the number of risk assessments had a significant relationships with the total number of work-related lost time injuries as a lagging indicator.\\nAccording to the results, the four the most important key performance indicators to assess the safety performance in the automotive industry were as follows: the number of risk assessments conducted, the percentage of corrected non- compliance, the percentage of safety educational programs implemented for workers, and Frequency Severity Index (FSI) index.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sigurnost\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sigurnost\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31306/s.63.4.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sigurnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31306/s.63.4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

任何管理体系的绩效都需要用充分和适当的指标进行监测。本研究旨在确定、确定优先次序和评估关键指标,以实施有效的业绩评价制度。本描述性分析研究分三个阶段进行。在第一阶段,进行半结构化访谈以及对公司文件和研究的审查,然后收集和选择一组关键指标。由专家(N = 11)确定指标的有效性,并根据SMART(具体,可测量,可实现,相关和有时限)标准使用层次分析法(AHP)对指标进行优先排序。根据研究框架,收集了60个关键绩效指标(kpi)的主要集合。效度评价结果显示,有23个指标的效度可接受。检查指标之间关系的结果表明,纠正不合规的百分比和风险评估的数量与工作损失时间伤害的总数作为一个滞后指标有显著的关系。根据结果,评估汽车行业安全绩效的四个最重要的关键绩效指标为:进行风险评估的次数、纠正不合规的百分比、对工人实施安全教育计划的百分比和频率严重性指数(FSI)指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritization and assessment of safety key performance indicators in an automotive industry
The performance of any management system needs to be monitored with adequate and proper indicators. This study aimed to identify, set priorities and assess key indicators for implementing an effective performance evaluation system. This descriptive-analytical study was carried out in three phase. In first phase, a semi-structured interview as well as a review of the company's documentation and studies carried out, then a set of key indicators were collected and selected. The validity of the indicators were determined by experts (N = 11) and indicators were prioritized using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) according to SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time- bound) criteria. Following the study framework, a primary set of 60 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were collected. The results of the validity assessment showed 23 indicators had acceptable validity. The results of examining the relationships between the indicators showed that the percentage of corrected non- compliance and the number of risk assessments had a significant relationships with the total number of work-related lost time injuries as a lagging indicator. According to the results, the four the most important key performance indicators to assess the safety performance in the automotive industry were as follows: the number of risk assessments conducted, the percentage of corrected non- compliance, the percentage of safety educational programs implemented for workers, and Frequency Severity Index (FSI) index.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sigurnost
Sigurnost Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信