比较两种不同剂量的苯肾上腺素联合催产素预防腰麻剖宫产术中催产素引起的低血压的疗效:一项随机比较研究

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
S. Kumari, Ratindra Barman, Pranab Kalita, Peter Engti
{"title":"比较两种不同剂量的苯肾上腺素联合催产素预防腰麻剖宫产术中催产素引起的低血压的疗效:一项随机比较研究","authors":"S. Kumari, Ratindra Barman, Pranab Kalita, Peter Engti","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_72_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A randomized comparative study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of two different bolus doses of phenylephrine to obtund the hypotensive effects of bolus oxytocin injection in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods: The study involved 180 parturients belonging to the ASAI and II, undergoing CS under SA were randomized into three groups, group A: oxytocin 3U and phenylephrine 50 μg; group B: oxytocin 3U and phenylephrine 75 μg; group C: oxytocin 3U and normal saline, administered intravenously over 5 min after delivery of anterior shoulder. The incidence of hypotension being the primary objective and hemodynamic changes, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, and other complications, such as total rescue vasopressor requirement, adequacy of uterine contraction, and the number of patients requiring additional uterotonics, were our secondary objectives. Results: The incidence of hypotension was highest in group C (83.3%) followed by group A (80%) and lowest in group B (11.6%). The total rescue doses of PE after T0 between the three groups showed that group A required (61.32 ± 41.19) μg, group B required (10.19 ± 29.75) μg, and group C required (113.21 ± 47.18) μg of PE. The uterine contraction was comparable between the groups. Incidence of nausea and vomiting and other complications were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Co-administration of PE 75 μg with OT 3 IU after delivery reduces the incidence of OT-induced hypotension and rescue vasopressor requirement compared to co-administration of 50 μg PE during CS under spinal anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To compare the efficacy of two different bolus doses of phenylephrine in combination with oxytocin in preventing oxytocin-induced hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: A randomized comparative study\",\"authors\":\"S. Kumari, Ratindra Barman, Pranab Kalita, Peter Engti\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_72_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A randomized comparative study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of two different bolus doses of phenylephrine to obtund the hypotensive effects of bolus oxytocin injection in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods: The study involved 180 parturients belonging to the ASAI and II, undergoing CS under SA were randomized into three groups, group A: oxytocin 3U and phenylephrine 50 μg; group B: oxytocin 3U and phenylephrine 75 μg; group C: oxytocin 3U and normal saline, administered intravenously over 5 min after delivery of anterior shoulder. The incidence of hypotension being the primary objective and hemodynamic changes, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, and other complications, such as total rescue vasopressor requirement, adequacy of uterine contraction, and the number of patients requiring additional uterotonics, were our secondary objectives. Results: The incidence of hypotension was highest in group C (83.3%) followed by group A (80%) and lowest in group B (11.6%). The total rescue doses of PE after T0 between the three groups showed that group A required (61.32 ± 41.19) μg, group B required (10.19 ± 29.75) μg, and group C required (113.21 ± 47.18) μg of PE. The uterine contraction was comparable between the groups. Incidence of nausea and vomiting and other complications were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Co-administration of PE 75 μg with OT 3 IU after delivery reduces the incidence of OT-induced hypotension and rescue vasopressor requirement compared to co-administration of 50 μg PE during CS under spinal anesthesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_72_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_72_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:进行了一项随机比较研究,以评估两种不同剂量的苯肾上腺素对腰麻下剖宫产患者单次注射催产素的降压效果的有效性。方法:将180例ASAI和II期SA下CS产妇随机分为三组:A组:催产素3U和苯肾上腺素50μg;B组:催产素3U和苯肾上腺素75μg;C组:催产素3U和生理盐水,在前肩分娩后5min以上静脉注射。低血压的发生率是主要目标,血液动力学变化、恶心和呕吐的发生率以及其他并发症,如完全抢救性血管升压药的需求、子宫收缩的充分性以及需要额外子宫补剂的患者数量,是我们的次要目标。结果:C组低血压发生率最高(83.3%),其次为A组(80%),B组最低(11.6%)。三组T0后PE总抢救剂量分别为:A组需要(61.32±41.19)μg、B组需要(10.19±29.75)μg和C组需要(113.21±47.18)μg PE。恶心呕吐和其他并发症的发生率在两组之间具有可比性。结论:与腰麻CS期间50μg PE联合给药相比,产后75μg PE与OT3IU联合给药可降低OT引起的低血压的发生率和抢救性血管升压药需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To compare the efficacy of two different bolus doses of phenylephrine in combination with oxytocin in preventing oxytocin-induced hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: A randomized comparative study
Background: A randomized comparative study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of two different bolus doses of phenylephrine to obtund the hypotensive effects of bolus oxytocin injection in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods: The study involved 180 parturients belonging to the ASAI and II, undergoing CS under SA were randomized into three groups, group A: oxytocin 3U and phenylephrine 50 μg; group B: oxytocin 3U and phenylephrine 75 μg; group C: oxytocin 3U and normal saline, administered intravenously over 5 min after delivery of anterior shoulder. The incidence of hypotension being the primary objective and hemodynamic changes, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, and other complications, such as total rescue vasopressor requirement, adequacy of uterine contraction, and the number of patients requiring additional uterotonics, were our secondary objectives. Results: The incidence of hypotension was highest in group C (83.3%) followed by group A (80%) and lowest in group B (11.6%). The total rescue doses of PE after T0 between the three groups showed that group A required (61.32 ± 41.19) μg, group B required (10.19 ± 29.75) μg, and group C required (113.21 ± 47.18) μg of PE. The uterine contraction was comparable between the groups. Incidence of nausea and vomiting and other complications were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Co-administration of PE 75 μg with OT 3 IU after delivery reduces the incidence of OT-induced hypotension and rescue vasopressor requirement compared to co-administration of 50 μg PE during CS under spinal anesthesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信