{"title":"将20世纪70年代的乡村Saemaul运动重新定位为现代设计运动","authors":"Jongkyun Kim","doi":"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background This study aims to analyze the background, content, development, and achievements of the Rural Saemaul Movement (New Village Movement) that took place in the late 1970s in South Korea from a design perspective. Methods The study examines the process of the influx and establishment of modernity and modernism in South Korea, focusing on architectural examples from the Japanese colonial era, the Manchukuo, and the US military government era. Subsequently, the study investigates the progress and achievements of the key policies of the Rural Saemaul movement, such as improving thatched roofs, upgrading substandard housing, enhancing living conditions, and dispelling superstitions, from a design perspective. Results Although the development process of the Rural Saemaul movement lacked rationality due to a top-down approach led by the government and the mobilization of residents, the outcomes resulted in a disruption of tradition and the incorporation of hygiene and science into the living environment, as well as standardization and mass production in housing styles, yielding results similar to Western modernist movements. Conclusions While it may be necessary to assess the colonial modernity and the deficiency of modernity in the 1970s Rural Saemaul movement, in terms of its results, the movement can be identified as the largest Modernist movement in South Korea.","PeriodicalId":52137,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Design Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessing the 1970s Rural Saemaul Movement as a Modern Design Movement\",\"authors\":\"Jongkyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background This study aims to analyze the background, content, development, and achievements of the Rural Saemaul Movement (New Village Movement) that took place in the late 1970s in South Korea from a design perspective. Methods The study examines the process of the influx and establishment of modernity and modernism in South Korea, focusing on architectural examples from the Japanese colonial era, the Manchukuo, and the US military government era. Subsequently, the study investigates the progress and achievements of the key policies of the Rural Saemaul movement, such as improving thatched roofs, upgrading substandard housing, enhancing living conditions, and dispelling superstitions, from a design perspective. Results Although the development process of the Rural Saemaul movement lacked rationality due to a top-down approach led by the government and the mobilization of residents, the outcomes resulted in a disruption of tradition and the incorporation of hygiene and science into the living environment, as well as standardization and mass production in housing styles, yielding results similar to Western modernist movements. Conclusions While it may be necessary to assess the colonial modernity and the deficiency of modernity in the 1970s Rural Saemaul movement, in terms of its results, the movement can be identified as the largest Modernist movement in South Korea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Design Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Design Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reassessing the 1970s Rural Saemaul Movement as a Modern Design Movement
Background This study aims to analyze the background, content, development, and achievements of the Rural Saemaul Movement (New Village Movement) that took place in the late 1970s in South Korea from a design perspective. Methods The study examines the process of the influx and establishment of modernity and modernism in South Korea, focusing on architectural examples from the Japanese colonial era, the Manchukuo, and the US military government era. Subsequently, the study investigates the progress and achievements of the key policies of the Rural Saemaul movement, such as improving thatched roofs, upgrading substandard housing, enhancing living conditions, and dispelling superstitions, from a design perspective. Results Although the development process of the Rural Saemaul movement lacked rationality due to a top-down approach led by the government and the mobilization of residents, the outcomes resulted in a disruption of tradition and the incorporation of hygiene and science into the living environment, as well as standardization and mass production in housing styles, yielding results similar to Western modernist movements. Conclusions While it may be necessary to assess the colonial modernity and the deficiency of modernity in the 1970s Rural Saemaul movement, in terms of its results, the movement can be identified as the largest Modernist movement in South Korea.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Design Research (ADR) is an international journal publishing original research in the field of design, including industrial design, visual communication design, interaction design, space design, and service design. It also invites research outcomes from design-related interdisciplinary fields such as the humanities, arts, technology, society and business. It is an open-access journal, publishing four issues per year. Currently papers are published in both English and Korean with an English abstract. ADR aims to build a strong foundation of knowledge in design through the introduction of basic, applied and clinical research. ADR serves as a venue and platform to archive and transfer fundamental design theories, methods, tools and cases. Research areas covered in the journal include: -Design Theory and its Methodology -Design Philosophy, Ethics, Values, and Issues -Design Education -Design Management and Strategy -Sustainability, Culture, History, and Societal Design -Human Behaviors, Perception, and Emotion -Semantics, Aesthetics and Experience in Design -Interaction and Interface Design -Design Tools and New Media -Universal Design/Inclusive Design -Design Creativity -Design Projects and Case Studies