将20世纪70年代的乡村Saemaul运动重新定位为现代设计运动

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Jongkyun Kim
{"title":"将20世纪70年代的乡村Saemaul运动重新定位为现代设计运动","authors":"Jongkyun Kim","doi":"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background This study aims to analyze the background, content, development, and achievements of the Rural Saemaul Movement (New Village Movement) that took place in the late 1970s in South Korea from a design perspective. Methods The study examines the process of the influx and establishment of modernity and modernism in South Korea, focusing on architectural examples from the Japanese colonial era, the Manchukuo, and the US military government era. Subsequently, the study investigates the progress and achievements of the key policies of the Rural Saemaul movement, such as improving thatched roofs, upgrading substandard housing, enhancing living conditions, and dispelling superstitions, from a design perspective. Results Although the development process of the Rural Saemaul movement lacked rationality due to a top-down approach led by the government and the mobilization of residents, the outcomes resulted in a disruption of tradition and the incorporation of hygiene and science into the living environment, as well as standardization and mass production in housing styles, yielding results similar to Western modernist movements. Conclusions While it may be necessary to assess the colonial modernity and the deficiency of modernity in the 1970s Rural Saemaul movement, in terms of its results, the movement can be identified as the largest Modernist movement in South Korea.","PeriodicalId":52137,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Design Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessing the 1970s Rural Saemaul Movement as a Modern Design Movement\",\"authors\":\"Jongkyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background This study aims to analyze the background, content, development, and achievements of the Rural Saemaul Movement (New Village Movement) that took place in the late 1970s in South Korea from a design perspective. Methods The study examines the process of the influx and establishment of modernity and modernism in South Korea, focusing on architectural examples from the Japanese colonial era, the Manchukuo, and the US military government era. Subsequently, the study investigates the progress and achievements of the key policies of the Rural Saemaul movement, such as improving thatched roofs, upgrading substandard housing, enhancing living conditions, and dispelling superstitions, from a design perspective. Results Although the development process of the Rural Saemaul movement lacked rationality due to a top-down approach led by the government and the mobilization of residents, the outcomes resulted in a disruption of tradition and the incorporation of hygiene and science into the living environment, as well as standardization and mass production in housing styles, yielding results similar to Western modernist movements. Conclusions While it may be necessary to assess the colonial modernity and the deficiency of modernity in the 1970s Rural Saemaul movement, in terms of its results, the movement can be identified as the largest Modernist movement in South Korea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Design Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Design Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究旨在从设计的角度分析20世纪70年代末韩国乡村社会运动(新村运动)的背景、内容、发展和成就。方法以日本殖民时代、满洲国和美国军政府时代的建筑为例,考察现代性和现代主义在韩国的涌入和确立过程。随后,本研究从设计的角度调查了农村Saemaul运动的关键政策的进展和成就,如改善茅草屋顶、升级不合标准的住房、改善生活条件和消除迷信。结果尽管由于政府领导的自上而下的方法和居民的动员,农村Saemaul运动的发展过程缺乏合理性,但其结果导致了传统的破坏,卫生和科学融入了生活环境,以及住房风格的标准化和大规模生产,产生了类似于西方现代主义运动的结果。结论虽然有必要对20世纪70年代“萨末乡村运动”中的殖民现代性和现代性不足进行评估,但就其结果而言,该运动可以被认定为韩国最大的现代主义运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reassessing the 1970s Rural Saemaul Movement as a Modern Design Movement
Background This study aims to analyze the background, content, development, and achievements of the Rural Saemaul Movement (New Village Movement) that took place in the late 1970s in South Korea from a design perspective. Methods The study examines the process of the influx and establishment of modernity and modernism in South Korea, focusing on architectural examples from the Japanese colonial era, the Manchukuo, and the US military government era. Subsequently, the study investigates the progress and achievements of the key policies of the Rural Saemaul movement, such as improving thatched roofs, upgrading substandard housing, enhancing living conditions, and dispelling superstitions, from a design perspective. Results Although the development process of the Rural Saemaul movement lacked rationality due to a top-down approach led by the government and the mobilization of residents, the outcomes resulted in a disruption of tradition and the incorporation of hygiene and science into the living environment, as well as standardization and mass production in housing styles, yielding results similar to Western modernist movements. Conclusions While it may be necessary to assess the colonial modernity and the deficiency of modernity in the 1970s Rural Saemaul movement, in terms of its results, the movement can be identified as the largest Modernist movement in South Korea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Design Research
Archives of Design Research Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Archives of Design Research (ADR) is an international journal publishing original research in the field of design, including industrial design, visual communication design, interaction design, space design, and service design. It also invites research outcomes from design-related interdisciplinary fields such as the humanities, arts, technology, society and business. It is an open-access journal, publishing four issues per year. Currently papers are published in both English and Korean with an English abstract. ADR aims to build a strong foundation of knowledge in design through the introduction of basic, applied and clinical research. ADR serves as a venue and platform to archive and transfer fundamental design theories, methods, tools and cases. Research areas covered in the journal include: -Design Theory and its Methodology -Design Philosophy, Ethics, Values, and Issues -Design Education -Design Management and Strategy -Sustainability, Culture, History, and Societal Design -Human Behaviors, Perception, and Emotion -Semantics, Aesthetics and Experience in Design -Interaction and Interface Design -Design Tools and New Media -Universal Design/Inclusive Design -Design Creativity -Design Projects and Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信