对协商妥协的批评和辩护

Pub Date : 2019-02-14 DOI:10.1075/JAIC.18009.LAA

Jan Albert Van Laar, E. Krabbe

{"title":"对协商妥协的批评和辩护","authors":"Jan Albert Van Laar, E. Krabbe","doi":"10.1075/JAIC.18009.LAA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch\n parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents\n of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing\n reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criticism and justification of negotiated compromises\",\"authors\":\"Jan Albert Van Laar, E. Krabbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JAIC.18009.LAA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch\\n parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents\\n of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing\\n reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JAIC.18009.LAA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JAIC.18009.LAA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

本文以荷兰议会关于批准2015年《巴黎气候变化协定》的辩论为例，重点讨论了关于已经谈判达成的妥协的冲突。它处理了反对批准的人可能提出的各种担忧，以及由此引发的辩护论点。报告最后介绍了对话情况，为参与此类冲突的各方提供了合理的选择。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

Criticism and justification of negotiated compromises

The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助