Sara Saei Dibavar, Pyeaam Abbasi, Hossein Pirnajmuddin
{"title":"J. M.库切的《敌人》中的社会心理作者","authors":"Sara Saei Dibavar, Pyeaam Abbasi, Hossein Pirnajmuddin","doi":"10.2979/reseafrilite.51.4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Using Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), we examine J. M. Coetzee's Foe (1986) to explain how the conceptual metaphor \"ARGUMENT IS WAR\" is central to the novel's thematics and to the fictional \"staging\" of debates concerning authorial emplotment through the workings of the \"social mind\"—here the prospective readership. We focus on the inter-character discourse staged during the civilized confrontation between Susan Barton (the character attempting to be an author) and Daniel Foe (the author) in an attempt to have their intended stories told. Thus the socially aware minds of both parties involved greatly contribute to the formation of the well-known plot of Defoe's Robinson Crusoe (1719). As a result of this argumentative path (ARGUMENT IS WAR), Susan and her framing narrative lose ground to the impositions by Foe and the exigencies of the social mind. A reading of the novel in terms of social mind with a focus on CMT reveals the cognitive complexity of the functioning of the social mind as a controlling medium in Foe.","PeriodicalId":21021,"journal":{"name":"Research in African Literatures","volume":"51 1","pages":"190 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Mind as Author(ity) in J. M. Coetzee's Foe\",\"authors\":\"Sara Saei Dibavar, Pyeaam Abbasi, Hossein Pirnajmuddin\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/reseafrilite.51.4.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Using Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), we examine J. M. Coetzee's Foe (1986) to explain how the conceptual metaphor \\\"ARGUMENT IS WAR\\\" is central to the novel's thematics and to the fictional \\\"staging\\\" of debates concerning authorial emplotment through the workings of the \\\"social mind\\\"—here the prospective readership. We focus on the inter-character discourse staged during the civilized confrontation between Susan Barton (the character attempting to be an author) and Daniel Foe (the author) in an attempt to have their intended stories told. Thus the socially aware minds of both parties involved greatly contribute to the formation of the well-known plot of Defoe's Robinson Crusoe (1719). As a result of this argumentative path (ARGUMENT IS WAR), Susan and her framing narrative lose ground to the impositions by Foe and the exigencies of the social mind. A reading of the novel in terms of social mind with a focus on CMT reveals the cognitive complexity of the functioning of the social mind as a controlling medium in Foe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in African Literatures\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"190 - 210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in African Literatures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.51.4.11\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in African Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.51.4.11","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT:Using Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), we examine J. M. Coetzee's Foe (1986) to explain how the conceptual metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" is central to the novel's thematics and to the fictional "staging" of debates concerning authorial emplotment through the workings of the "social mind"—here the prospective readership. We focus on the inter-character discourse staged during the civilized confrontation between Susan Barton (the character attempting to be an author) and Daniel Foe (the author) in an attempt to have their intended stories told. Thus the socially aware minds of both parties involved greatly contribute to the formation of the well-known plot of Defoe's Robinson Crusoe (1719). As a result of this argumentative path (ARGUMENT IS WAR), Susan and her framing narrative lose ground to the impositions by Foe and the exigencies of the social mind. A reading of the novel in terms of social mind with a focus on CMT reveals the cognitive complexity of the functioning of the social mind as a controlling medium in Foe.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1970, Research in African Literatures is the premier journal of African literary studies worldwide and provides a forum in English for research on the oral and written literatures of Africa, as well as information on African publishing, announcements of importance to Africanists, and notes and queries of literary interest. Reviews of current scholarly books are included in every issue, often presented as review essays, and a forum offers readers the opportunity to respond to issues raised in articles and book reviews.