双语和单语大学生对生物学文本的理解:探讨呈现方式、先前知识和主题享受的影响。

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Amanda De Luis Sanabria, Maya Abdelkhaleq, Alessandra Valentini
{"title":"双语和单语大学生对生物学文本的理解:探讨呈现方式、先前知识和主题享受的影响。","authors":"Amanda De Luis Sanabria, Maya Abdelkhaleq, Alessandra Valentini","doi":"10.1037/tps0000376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigated the effects of presentation modality (reading compared to reading while listening – RWL), biology enjoyment and biology knowledge on the comprehension of biology texts in a group of 94 university students with a wide range of language experiences. Language experience was measured both categorically (bilinguals compared to non-bilinguals) and continuously, using a detailed questionnaire on bilingualism. Participants were presented with two biology texts, one written, and one presented in two modalities simultaneously (oral and written) and completed a comprehension task after each text. They also rated their knowledge and enjoyment of biology and completed the language questionnaire. The results highlight an advantage for bilingual students when it comes to comprehending texts, and this advantage is especially notable in the Reading condition. Results also highlight a positive effect of students’ subject enjoyment on performance, particularly in the case of bilingual students. Analyses including language experience as categorical or continuous showed the same results, except a lack of interaction between language experience and presentation modality in the analyses with language experience as continuous. This suggests that bilingual participants are those most likely to experience facilitation from the reading condition, but this facilitation might be experienced similarly by bilinguals past a certain language threshold. In conclusion, bilinguals had higher comprehension scores than non-bilinguals, and presentation modality affects bilingual and non-bilingual students differently, with bilingual university students being advantaged by a written presentation of the material and being more affected by their enjoyment of biology than their non-bilingual peers.","PeriodicalId":29959,"journal":{"name":"Translational Issues in Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehension of biology texts in bilingual and monolingual university students: Exploring the effect of presentation modality, previous knowledge, and topic enjoyment.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda De Luis Sanabria, Maya Abdelkhaleq, Alessandra Valentini\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tps0000376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study investigated the effects of presentation modality (reading compared to reading while listening – RWL), biology enjoyment and biology knowledge on the comprehension of biology texts in a group of 94 university students with a wide range of language experiences. Language experience was measured both categorically (bilinguals compared to non-bilinguals) and continuously, using a detailed questionnaire on bilingualism. Participants were presented with two biology texts, one written, and one presented in two modalities simultaneously (oral and written) and completed a comprehension task after each text. They also rated their knowledge and enjoyment of biology and completed the language questionnaire. The results highlight an advantage for bilingual students when it comes to comprehending texts, and this advantage is especially notable in the Reading condition. Results also highlight a positive effect of students’ subject enjoyment on performance, particularly in the case of bilingual students. Analyses including language experience as categorical or continuous showed the same results, except a lack of interaction between language experience and presentation modality in the analyses with language experience as continuous. This suggests that bilingual participants are those most likely to experience facilitation from the reading condition, but this facilitation might be experienced similarly by bilinguals past a certain language threshold. In conclusion, bilinguals had higher comprehension scores than non-bilinguals, and presentation modality affects bilingual and non-bilingual students differently, with bilingual university students being advantaged by a written presentation of the material and being more affected by their enjoyment of biology than their non-bilingual peers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Issues in Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Issues in Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Issues in Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了94名具有广泛语言经验的大学生的陈述方式(与边听边读相比——RWL)、生物乐趣和生物知识对生物文本理解的影响。使用一份关于双语的详细问卷,对语言体验进行了明确和持续的测量(双语者与非双语者相比)。参与者被出示了两篇生物学文本,一篇是书面的,一篇同时以两种方式(口头和书面)呈现,并在每篇文本后完成了一项理解任务。他们还对自己的生物学知识和乐趣进行了评分,并完成了语言问卷。研究结果突出了双语学生在理解文本方面的优势,这种优势在阅读条件下尤为显著。研究结果还强调了学生的学科享受对成绩的积极影响,尤其是在双语学生的情况下。将语言体验作为范畴或连续的分析显示出相同的结果,只是在将语言体验视为连续的分析中,语言体验和呈现模态之间缺乏互动。这表明,双语参与者是最有可能从阅读条件中体验到便利的人,但超过一定语言阈值的双语者可能也会体验到这种便利。总之,双语者的理解得分高于非双语者,呈现方式对双语和非双语学生的影响不同,双语大学生比非双语同龄人更喜欢书面呈现材料,更喜欢生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehension of biology texts in bilingual and monolingual university students: Exploring the effect of presentation modality, previous knowledge, and topic enjoyment.
The present study investigated the effects of presentation modality (reading compared to reading while listening – RWL), biology enjoyment and biology knowledge on the comprehension of biology texts in a group of 94 university students with a wide range of language experiences. Language experience was measured both categorically (bilinguals compared to non-bilinguals) and continuously, using a detailed questionnaire on bilingualism. Participants were presented with two biology texts, one written, and one presented in two modalities simultaneously (oral and written) and completed a comprehension task after each text. They also rated their knowledge and enjoyment of biology and completed the language questionnaire. The results highlight an advantage for bilingual students when it comes to comprehending texts, and this advantage is especially notable in the Reading condition. Results also highlight a positive effect of students’ subject enjoyment on performance, particularly in the case of bilingual students. Analyses including language experience as categorical or continuous showed the same results, except a lack of interaction between language experience and presentation modality in the analyses with language experience as continuous. This suggests that bilingual participants are those most likely to experience facilitation from the reading condition, but this facilitation might be experienced similarly by bilinguals past a certain language threshold. In conclusion, bilinguals had higher comprehension scores than non-bilinguals, and presentation modality affects bilingual and non-bilingual students differently, with bilingual university students being advantaged by a written presentation of the material and being more affected by their enjoyment of biology than their non-bilingual peers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信