博尔赫斯的伦理学阅读

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Shea Hennum
{"title":"博尔赫斯的伦理学阅读","authors":"Shea Hennum","doi":"10.2979/jmodelite.46.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Although critics and lay readers have understood Jorge Luis Borges as an asocial and abstract thinker, their position has produced a reductive conception of Borges that obscures his most original aesthetic and philosophical ideas. Reconsidering Borges through three of his most famous stories—“The Garden of Forking Paths,” “A Survey of the Works of Herbert Quain,” and “Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote”—reveals a philosophy of reading that, in classic Borges fashion, doubles as a philosophy of ethics. Understanding these philosophies as one and the same makes possible a fresh view of Borges’s aesthetic games and his interest in human interaction.","PeriodicalId":44453,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MODERN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Borges Ethically\",\"authors\":\"Shea Hennum\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/jmodelite.46.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Although critics and lay readers have understood Jorge Luis Borges as an asocial and abstract thinker, their position has produced a reductive conception of Borges that obscures his most original aesthetic and philosophical ideas. Reconsidering Borges through three of his most famous stories—“The Garden of Forking Paths,” “A Survey of the Works of Herbert Quain,” and “Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote”—reveals a philosophy of reading that, in classic Borges fashion, doubles as a philosophy of ethics. Understanding these philosophies as one and the same makes possible a fresh view of Borges’s aesthetic games and his interest in human interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF MODERN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF MODERN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.46.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MODERN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.46.1.02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:尽管评论家和普通读者已经将豪尔赫·路易斯·博尔赫斯理解为一个非社会和抽象的思想家,但他们的立场产生了对博尔赫斯的简化概念,模糊了他最原始的美学和哲学思想。通过博尔赫斯最著名的三个故事——《岔路花园》、《赫伯特·奎因作品概览》和《堂吉诃德的作者皮埃尔·梅纳德》——重新思考博尔赫斯,揭示了一种阅读哲学,以博尔赫斯的经典方式,它兼作伦理哲学。将这些哲学理解为一体,有可能对博尔赫斯的美学游戏和他对人类互动的兴趣产生新的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reading Borges Ethically
Abstract:Although critics and lay readers have understood Jorge Luis Borges as an asocial and abstract thinker, their position has produced a reductive conception of Borges that obscures his most original aesthetic and philosophical ideas. Reconsidering Borges through three of his most famous stories—“The Garden of Forking Paths,” “A Survey of the Works of Herbert Quain,” and “Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote”—reveals a philosophy of reading that, in classic Borges fashion, doubles as a philosophy of ethics. Understanding these philosophies as one and the same makes possible a fresh view of Borges’s aesthetic games and his interest in human interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信