非图像引导扳机指注射的准确性和安全性:一项尸体研究。

The Hand Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-03 DOI:10.1177/15589447221093676
Daniel D Binz, Thomas W Mitchell, Scott A Mitchell
{"title":"非图像引导扳机指注射的准确性和安全性:一项尸体研究。","authors":"Daniel D Binz, Thomas W Mitchell, Scott A Mitchell","doi":"10.1177/15589447221093676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stenosing flexor tenosynovitis is commonly treated by injection of corticosteroids into the flexor tendon sheath. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal technique, specifically when not utilizing ultrasound guidance. Here, we present a cadaver study in which 3 common techniques of flexor sheath injection were compared with regard to their accuracy and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaver hands (60 digits) were evenly divided into 3 groups (20 digits per group). Digits in each group were injected with methylene blue dye using 1 of the 3 techniques (palmar-to-bone, palmar supra-tendinous, and mid-axial). The fingers were then dissected and were inspected for location of dye, as well as injury to tendon or digital nerves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mid-axial technique demonstrated the greatest accuracy with the highest rate of all intra-sheath injection, 15 of 20 digits (75%), while the palmar-to-bone technique produced the most combined intra- and extra-sheath injections, 13 of 20 digits, (65%) and the palmar supra-tendinous technique resulted in the most all extra-sheath injections, 9 of 20 digits (45%). The difference in rates of all intra-sheath injection was significant (<i>P</i> = .01). The mid-axial technique also produced the fewest intra-tendinous injections 0 of 20, although this result did not reach statistical significance (<i>P</i> = .15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to other common non-image guided flexor tendon sheath injection techniques, the mid-axial injection technique was found to be the most accurate in producing all intra-sheath injection and least likely to result in intra-tendinous injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"1 1","pages":"1349-1356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and Safety of Non-Image Guided Trigger Finger Injections: A Cadaveric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel D Binz, Thomas W Mitchell, Scott A Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447221093676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stenosing flexor tenosynovitis is commonly treated by injection of corticosteroids into the flexor tendon sheath. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal technique, specifically when not utilizing ultrasound guidance. Here, we present a cadaver study in which 3 common techniques of flexor sheath injection were compared with regard to their accuracy and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaver hands (60 digits) were evenly divided into 3 groups (20 digits per group). Digits in each group were injected with methylene blue dye using 1 of the 3 techniques (palmar-to-bone, palmar supra-tendinous, and mid-axial). The fingers were then dissected and were inspected for location of dye, as well as injury to tendon or digital nerves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mid-axial technique demonstrated the greatest accuracy with the highest rate of all intra-sheath injection, 15 of 20 digits (75%), while the palmar-to-bone technique produced the most combined intra- and extra-sheath injections, 13 of 20 digits, (65%) and the palmar supra-tendinous technique resulted in the most all extra-sheath injections, 9 of 20 digits (45%). The difference in rates of all intra-sheath injection was significant (<i>P</i> = .01). The mid-axial technique also produced the fewest intra-tendinous injections 0 of 20, although this result did not reach statistical significance (<i>P</i> = .15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to other common non-image guided flexor tendon sheath injection techniques, the mid-axial injection technique was found to be the most accurate in producing all intra-sheath injection and least likely to result in intra-tendinous injection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hand\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1349-1356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617481/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447221093676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447221093676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景屈肌腱鞘内注射皮质类固醇是治疗屈肌腱滑膜炎的常用方法。然而,文献中对最佳技术没有达成共识,特别是在不使用超声引导的情况下。在这里,我们提出了一项尸体研究,其中对屈肌鞘注射的三种常见技术的准确性和安全性进行了比较。方法将新鲜冷冻尸手60指,平均分为3组(每组20指)。使用3种技术中的1种(手掌至骨骼、手掌腱上和中轴),对每组手指注射亚甲基蓝染料。然后解剖手指,检查染料的位置,以及肌腱或指神经的损伤。结果中轴技术的准确率最高,鞘内注射率最高,为20指中的15指(75%),而掌骨技术的鞘内和鞘外联合注射最多,为20指中的13指(65%),掌腱上技术的鞘外注射最多,20指中有9指(45%)。所有鞘内注射的比率差异显著(P=.01)。中轴技术也产生了最少的腱内注射,20次中的0次,尽管这一结果没有达到统计学意义(P=.15)。结论与其他常见的非图像引导屈肌腱鞘注射技术相比,中轴注射技术被发现在产生所有鞘内注射方面最准确,并且最不可能导致腱内注射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy and Safety of Non-Image Guided Trigger Finger Injections: A Cadaveric Study.

Background: Stenosing flexor tenosynovitis is commonly treated by injection of corticosteroids into the flexor tendon sheath. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal technique, specifically when not utilizing ultrasound guidance. Here, we present a cadaver study in which 3 common techniques of flexor sheath injection were compared with regard to their accuracy and safety profiles.

Methods: Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaver hands (60 digits) were evenly divided into 3 groups (20 digits per group). Digits in each group were injected with methylene blue dye using 1 of the 3 techniques (palmar-to-bone, palmar supra-tendinous, and mid-axial). The fingers were then dissected and were inspected for location of dye, as well as injury to tendon or digital nerves.

Results: The mid-axial technique demonstrated the greatest accuracy with the highest rate of all intra-sheath injection, 15 of 20 digits (75%), while the palmar-to-bone technique produced the most combined intra- and extra-sheath injections, 13 of 20 digits, (65%) and the palmar supra-tendinous technique resulted in the most all extra-sheath injections, 9 of 20 digits (45%). The difference in rates of all intra-sheath injection was significant (P = .01). The mid-axial technique also produced the fewest intra-tendinous injections 0 of 20, although this result did not reach statistical significance (P = .15).

Conclusions: Compared to other common non-image guided flexor tendon sheath injection techniques, the mid-axial injection technique was found to be the most accurate in producing all intra-sheath injection and least likely to result in intra-tendinous injection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信