{"title":"论不一致性在量子基础辩论和希尔伯特空间公式中的作用","authors":"Debajyoti Gangopadhyay","doi":"10.12743/quanta.v11i1.195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is intended mainly to develop an expository outline of an inherently inconsistent reasoning in the development of quantum mechanics during 1920s, which set up the background of proposing different variants of quantum logic a bit later. We will discuss here two of the quantum logical variants with reference to Hilbert space formulation, based on the proposals of Bohr and Schrödinger as a result of addressing the same kernel of difficulties and will give a relative comparison. Our presentation is fairly informal, as our goal here is to simply sketch the central ideas leaving further details for other occasions.Quanta 2022; 11: 28–41.","PeriodicalId":37613,"journal":{"name":"Quanta","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space Formulation\",\"authors\":\"Debajyoti Gangopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.12743/quanta.v11i1.195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is intended mainly to develop an expository outline of an inherently inconsistent reasoning in the development of quantum mechanics during 1920s, which set up the background of proposing different variants of quantum logic a bit later. We will discuss here two of the quantum logical variants with reference to Hilbert space formulation, based on the proposals of Bohr and Schrödinger as a result of addressing the same kernel of difficulties and will give a relative comparison. Our presentation is fairly informal, as our goal here is to simply sketch the central ideas leaving further details for other occasions.Quanta 2022; 11: 28–41.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quanta\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quanta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12743/quanta.v11i1.195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quanta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12743/quanta.v11i1.195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space Formulation
This article is intended mainly to develop an expository outline of an inherently inconsistent reasoning in the development of quantum mechanics during 1920s, which set up the background of proposing different variants of quantum logic a bit later. We will discuss here two of the quantum logical variants with reference to Hilbert space formulation, based on the proposals of Bohr and Schrödinger as a result of addressing the same kernel of difficulties and will give a relative comparison. Our presentation is fairly informal, as our goal here is to simply sketch the central ideas leaving further details for other occasions.Quanta 2022; 11: 28–41.
QuantaArts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Quanta is an open access academic journal publishing original research and review articles on foundations of quantum mechanics, mathematical physics and philosophy of science.