中国法律下国际仲裁临时措施的发布和执行

Q3 Social Sciences

Arbitration International Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1093/arbint/aiad006

Jian’an Wu, Shicong Qin, Xuetong Wang

{"title":"中国法律下国际仲裁临时措施的发布和执行","authors":"Jian’an Wu, Shicong Qin, Xuetong Wang","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiad006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The issuance and enforcement of interim measures in international arbitration play a critical role for the parties to resolve the dispute and realize the final arbitral award. For arbitration seated in China, the power to issue interim measures traditionally vests exclusively in the Chinese Courts under the current Arbitration Law and Civil Procedure Law of PRC, except for limited types of arbitration. Aiming to align the Chinese arbitration law with international practices, the Ministry of Justice of China introduced the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China (Amendment) (Draft for Comments) in July 2021 which for the first time empowers the arbitral institutions at the legislative level to issue interim measures. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current as well as the newly introduced legal framework in China for the issuance and enforcement of interim measures in foreign-related arbitrations. Although the Amendment recognises the power of arbitral tribunals to issue interim measures in arbitrations seated in China, whether measures issued in arbitrations seated outside of China could be enforced in China remains unclear and the existing Civil Procedure Law of PRC would need to be further clarified to synchronise with the latest reform in Arbitration law.","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The issuance and enforcement of interim measures in international arbitration under Chinese law\",\"authors\":\"Jian’an Wu, Shicong Qin, Xuetong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arbint/aiad006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The issuance and enforcement of interim measures in international arbitration play a critical role for the parties to resolve the dispute and realize the final arbitral award. For arbitration seated in China, the power to issue interim measures traditionally vests exclusively in the Chinese Courts under the current Arbitration Law and Civil Procedure Law of PRC, except for limited types of arbitration. Aiming to align the Chinese arbitration law with international practices, the Ministry of Justice of China introduced the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China (Amendment) (Draft for Comments) in July 2021 which for the first time empowers the arbitral institutions at the legislative level to issue interim measures. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current as well as the newly introduced legal framework in China for the issuance and enforcement of interim measures in foreign-related arbitrations. Although the Amendment recognises the power of arbitral tribunals to issue interim measures in arbitrations seated in China, whether measures issued in arbitrations seated outside of China could be enforced in China remains unclear and the existing Civil Procedure Law of PRC would need to be further clarified to synchronise with the latest reform in Arbitration law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitration International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitration International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitration International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在国际仲裁中，临时措施的颁布和执行对当事方解决争端和实现仲裁的最终裁决起着至关重要的作用。对于在中国进行的仲裁，根据现行《仲裁法》和《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》，发布临时措施的权力传统上只属于中国法院，但有限类型的仲裁除外。为使中国仲裁法与国际惯例接轨，中国司法部于2021年7月出台了《中华人民共和国仲裁法(修正案)(征求意见稿)》，首次在立法层面授权仲裁机构发布暂行办法。本文全面概述了中国在涉外仲裁中发布和执行临时措施的现行法律框架以及新出台的法律框架。虽然《修正案》承认仲裁庭有权在中国仲裁中发布临时措施，但在中国境外仲裁中发布的临时措施是否可以在中国执行仍不清楚，中国现行的《民事诉讼法》需要进一步明确，以与仲裁法的最新改革同步。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The issuance and enforcement of interim measures in international arbitration under Chinese law

The issuance and enforcement of interim measures in international arbitration play a critical role for the parties to resolve the dispute and realize the final arbitral award. For arbitration seated in China, the power to issue interim measures traditionally vests exclusively in the Chinese Courts under the current Arbitration Law and Civil Procedure Law of PRC, except for limited types of arbitration. Aiming to align the Chinese arbitration law with international practices, the Ministry of Justice of China introduced the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China (Amendment) (Draft for Comments) in July 2021 which for the first time empowers the arbitral institutions at the legislative level to issue interim measures. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current as well as the newly introduced legal framework in China for the issuance and enforcement of interim measures in foreign-related arbitrations. Although the Amendment recognises the power of arbitral tribunals to issue interim measures in arbitrations seated in China, whether measures issued in arbitrations seated outside of China could be enforced in China remains unclear and the existing Civil Procedure Law of PRC would need to be further clarified to synchronise with the latest reform in Arbitration law.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Arbitration International Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Launched in 1985, Arbitration International provides quarterly coverage for national and international developments in the world of arbitration. The journal aims to maintain balance between academic debate and practical contributions to the field, providing both topical material on current developments and analytic scholarship of permanent interest. Arbitrators, counsel, judges, scholars and government officials will find the journal enhances their understanding of a broad range of topics in commercial and investment arbitration. Features include (i) articles covering all major arbitration rules and national jurisdictions written by respected international practitioners and scholars, (ii) cutting edge (case) notes covering recent developments and ongoing debates in the field, (iii) book reviews of the latest publications in the world of arbitration, (iv) Letters to the Editor and (v) agora grouping articles related to a common theme. Arbitration International maintains a balance between controversial subjects for debate and topics geared toward practical use by arbitrators, lawyers, academics, judges, corporate advisors and government officials.