{"title":"从肖像学到考古学:沙科特之后的弗洛伊德","authors":"Richard H. Armstrong","doi":"10.1353/aim.2021.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This work explores Freud's archaeology as a departure from Charcot's iconography of hysteria. It begins with a comparison between two grotesque figures that appear in the men's work, which reveal in their analyses a characteristic approach to the hysterical symptom (Charcot) and the neurotic compulsion (Freud). The article then proceeds to detail Charcot's dependence upon historical iconography to shore up his construction of grand hysteria, and how Freud, though at first in agreement, gradually came to distance himself from it. Then Freud's 1922 study of a demonic possession is explored as Freud's final \"deferred disobedience\" from Charcot on the matter of \"retrospective medicine.\"","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"78 1","pages":"215 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Iconography to Archaeology: Freud after Charcot\",\"authors\":\"Richard H. Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/aim.2021.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This work explores Freud's archaeology as a departure from Charcot's iconography of hysteria. It begins with a comparison between two grotesque figures that appear in the men's work, which reveal in their analyses a characteristic approach to the hysterical symptom (Charcot) and the neurotic compulsion (Freud). The article then proceeds to detail Charcot's dependence upon historical iconography to shore up his construction of grand hysteria, and how Freud, though at first in agreement, gradually came to distance himself from it. Then Freud's 1922 study of a demonic possession is explored as Freud's final \\\"deferred disobedience\\\" from Charcot on the matter of \\\"retrospective medicine.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":44377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN IMAGO\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN IMAGO\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2021.0011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN IMAGO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2021.0011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
From Iconography to Archaeology: Freud after Charcot
Abstract:This work explores Freud's archaeology as a departure from Charcot's iconography of hysteria. It begins with a comparison between two grotesque figures that appear in the men's work, which reveal in their analyses a characteristic approach to the hysterical symptom (Charcot) and the neurotic compulsion (Freud). The article then proceeds to detail Charcot's dependence upon historical iconography to shore up his construction of grand hysteria, and how Freud, though at first in agreement, gradually came to distance himself from it. Then Freud's 1922 study of a demonic possession is explored as Freud's final "deferred disobedience" from Charcot on the matter of "retrospective medicine."
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1939 by Sigmund Freud and Hanns Sachs, AMERICAN IMAGO is the preeminent scholarly journal of psychoanalysis. Appearing quarterly, AMERICAN IMAGO publishes innovative articles on the history and theory of psychoanalysis as well as on the reciprocal relations between psychoanalysis and the broad range of disciplines that constitute the human sciences. Since 2001, the journal has been edited by Peter L. Rudnytsky, who has made each issue a "special issue" and introduced a topical book review section, with a guest editor for every Fall issue.