S. S. Sau, A. Santiago, M. Peralta, Jimmy Jarvis Gene C. Lo, Aliana Jimenez Vera Cruz
{"title":"阿托品滴眼液减少近视儿童近视进展和轴伸长的疗效:一项荟萃分析","authors":"S. S. Sau, A. Santiago, M. Peralta, Jimmy Jarvis Gene C. Lo, Aliana Jimenez Vera Cruz","doi":"10.35119/ASJOO.V18I1.593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To determine the efficacy of various concentrations of atropine eyedrops on retarding myopia progression and axial elongation in Asian children. \nStudy design: Meta-analysis. \nMethods: Randomized clinical trials and prospective interventional non-randomized studies which enrolled children aged 4 to 14 years old who received atropine treatment for myopia were included in the study. The Cochrane Collaboration 6 aspects of bias was used to assess the risk of bias for all included studies. Outcome measures were myopia progression and axial elongation. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. \nResults: Eight randomized clinical trials and two prospective interventional non-randomized studies which included a total of 1,229 Asian children were included in the analysis. The pooled mean difference between control and atropine for myopia progression was 0.77 diopters (D) per year [CI 0.64, 0.89]. Subgroup analysis by concentration showed a decreasing trend with decreasing concentration. The pooled mean difference of myopia progression for 1%, 0.5%, 0.25%, and 0.1–0.125% atropine was 0.97 D/year [CI 0.72, 1.21], 0.88 D/year [CI 0.74, 1.02], 0.79 D/year [CI 0.37, 1.21], and 0.80 D/year [CI 0.62, 0.97], respectively; whereas that for 0.01% atropine was 0.46 D/year [CI -0.02, 0.94] indicating that this intervention may or may not be favorable for slowing myopia progression. The pooled mean difference between control and atropine for axial elongation was -0.22 mm [CI -0.29, -0.14] favoring atropine. Subgroup analysis by concentration also showed decreasing trend with decreasing concentration. The pooled mean difference of axial elongation for 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, and 0.025% atropine was -0.44 mm [CI -0.57, -0.32], -0.19 mm [CI -0.35, -0.04], -0.10 mm [CI -0.17, -0.03], -0.21 mm [CI -0.28, -0.14], and -0.12 mm [CI -0.16, -0.08], respectively; whereas that for 0.01% atropine was -0.01 mm [CI -0.09, 0.06] indicating that this intervention may or may not be favorable in reducing axial elongation. \nConclusion: This meta-analysis shows that the effects of atropine for both myopia progression and axial elongation are dose-dependent for the concentration 0.025% to 1%. Results for 0.01% atropine are still equivocal.","PeriodicalId":39864,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"18 1","pages":"75-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of atropine eyedrops in reducing myopia progression and axial elongation in myopic children: a meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. S. Sau, A. Santiago, M. Peralta, Jimmy Jarvis Gene C. Lo, Aliana Jimenez Vera Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.35119/ASJOO.V18I1.593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To determine the efficacy of various concentrations of atropine eyedrops on retarding myopia progression and axial elongation in Asian children. \\nStudy design: Meta-analysis. \\nMethods: Randomized clinical trials and prospective interventional non-randomized studies which enrolled children aged 4 to 14 years old who received atropine treatment for myopia were included in the study. The Cochrane Collaboration 6 aspects of bias was used to assess the risk of bias for all included studies. Outcome measures were myopia progression and axial elongation. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. \\nResults: Eight randomized clinical trials and two prospective interventional non-randomized studies which included a total of 1,229 Asian children were included in the analysis. The pooled mean difference between control and atropine for myopia progression was 0.77 diopters (D) per year [CI 0.64, 0.89]. Subgroup analysis by concentration showed a decreasing trend with decreasing concentration. The pooled mean difference of myopia progression for 1%, 0.5%, 0.25%, and 0.1–0.125% atropine was 0.97 D/year [CI 0.72, 1.21], 0.88 D/year [CI 0.74, 1.02], 0.79 D/year [CI 0.37, 1.21], and 0.80 D/year [CI 0.62, 0.97], respectively; whereas that for 0.01% atropine was 0.46 D/year [CI -0.02, 0.94] indicating that this intervention may or may not be favorable for slowing myopia progression. The pooled mean difference between control and atropine for axial elongation was -0.22 mm [CI -0.29, -0.14] favoring atropine. Subgroup analysis by concentration also showed decreasing trend with decreasing concentration. The pooled mean difference of axial elongation for 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, and 0.025% atropine was -0.44 mm [CI -0.57, -0.32], -0.19 mm [CI -0.35, -0.04], -0.10 mm [CI -0.17, -0.03], -0.21 mm [CI -0.28, -0.14], and -0.12 mm [CI -0.16, -0.08], respectively; whereas that for 0.01% atropine was -0.01 mm [CI -0.09, 0.06] indicating that this intervention may or may not be favorable in reducing axial elongation. \\nConclusion: This meta-analysis shows that the effects of atropine for both myopia progression and axial elongation are dose-dependent for the concentration 0.025% to 1%. Results for 0.01% atropine are still equivocal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"75-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35119/ASJOO.V18I1.593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/ASJOO.V18I1.593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨不同浓度阿托品滴眼液延缓亚洲儿童近视进展和眼轴伸长的疗效。研究设计:荟萃分析。方法:纳入4 ~ 14岁接受阿托品治疗近视儿童的随机临床试验和前瞻性干预性非随机研究。Cochrane Collaboration 6 aspects of bias用于评估所有纳入研究的偏倚风险。结果测量近视进展和轴向伸长。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果:8项随机临床试验和2项前瞻性干预性非随机研究纳入分析,共纳入1229名亚洲儿童。对照组和阿托品组近视进展的总平均差异为每年0.77屈光度(D) [CI 0.64, 0.89]。浓度亚组分析显示随浓度降低呈下降趋势。1%、0.5%、0.25%和0.1-0.125%阿托品组近视进展的综合平均差值分别为0.97 D/年[CI 0.72, 1.21]、0.88 D/年[CI 0.74, 1.02]、0.79 D/年[CI 0.37, 1.21]和0.80 D/年[CI 0.62, 0.97];而0.01%的阿托品为0.46 D/年[CI -0.02, 0.94],表明该干预可能有利于也可能不利于减缓近视进展。对照和阿托品轴向伸长率的汇总平均差异为-0.22 mm [CI -0.29, -0.14],有利于阿托品。浓度亚组分析也随浓度的降低呈下降趋势。1%、0.5%、0.1%、0.05%和0.025%阿托品的轴向伸长率平均差值分别为-0.44 mm [CI -0.57, -0.32]、-0.19 mm [CI -0.35, -0.04]、-0.10 mm [CI -0.17, -0.03]、-0.21 mm [CI -0.28, -0.14]和-0.12 mm [CI -0.16, -0.08];而0.01%的阿托品则为-0.01 mm [CI -0.09, 0.06],表明这种干预可能有利于也可能不利于降低轴向伸长。结论:本荟萃分析显示,阿托品对近视进展和轴向伸长的影响在0.025% ~ 1%浓度范围内呈剂量依赖性。0.01%阿托品的结果仍然模棱两可。
Efficacy of atropine eyedrops in reducing myopia progression and axial elongation in myopic children: a meta-analysis
Purpose: To determine the efficacy of various concentrations of atropine eyedrops on retarding myopia progression and axial elongation in Asian children.
Study design: Meta-analysis.
Methods: Randomized clinical trials and prospective interventional non-randomized studies which enrolled children aged 4 to 14 years old who received atropine treatment for myopia were included in the study. The Cochrane Collaboration 6 aspects of bias was used to assess the risk of bias for all included studies. Outcome measures were myopia progression and axial elongation. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model.
Results: Eight randomized clinical trials and two prospective interventional non-randomized studies which included a total of 1,229 Asian children were included in the analysis. The pooled mean difference between control and atropine for myopia progression was 0.77 diopters (D) per year [CI 0.64, 0.89]. Subgroup analysis by concentration showed a decreasing trend with decreasing concentration. The pooled mean difference of myopia progression for 1%, 0.5%, 0.25%, and 0.1–0.125% atropine was 0.97 D/year [CI 0.72, 1.21], 0.88 D/year [CI 0.74, 1.02], 0.79 D/year [CI 0.37, 1.21], and 0.80 D/year [CI 0.62, 0.97], respectively; whereas that for 0.01% atropine was 0.46 D/year [CI -0.02, 0.94] indicating that this intervention may or may not be favorable for slowing myopia progression. The pooled mean difference between control and atropine for axial elongation was -0.22 mm [CI -0.29, -0.14] favoring atropine. Subgroup analysis by concentration also showed decreasing trend with decreasing concentration. The pooled mean difference of axial elongation for 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, and 0.025% atropine was -0.44 mm [CI -0.57, -0.32], -0.19 mm [CI -0.35, -0.04], -0.10 mm [CI -0.17, -0.03], -0.21 mm [CI -0.28, -0.14], and -0.12 mm [CI -0.16, -0.08], respectively; whereas that for 0.01% atropine was -0.01 mm [CI -0.09, 0.06] indicating that this intervention may or may not be favorable in reducing axial elongation.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that the effects of atropine for both myopia progression and axial elongation are dose-dependent for the concentration 0.025% to 1%. Results for 0.01% atropine are still equivocal.
期刊介绍:
Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is the official peer-reviewed journal of the South East Asia Glaucoma Interest Group (SEAGIG) and is indexed in EMBASE/Excerpta Medica. Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is published quarterly (four [4] issues per year) by Scientific Communications International Limited. The journal is published on-line only and is distributed free of cost via the SEAGIG website.