仿真技术在陶瓷厂厂房布置改进中的应用

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
C. Kasemset, Takron Opassuwan, Thanakit Tangsittikhun, Nititada Chaiyajina
{"title":"仿真技术在陶瓷厂厂房布置改进中的应用","authors":"C. Kasemset, Takron Opassuwan, Thanakit Tangsittikhun, Nititada Chaiyajina","doi":"10.30657/pea.2023.29.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to design and improve the plant layout of a ceramic factory by adopting Systematic Layout Planning (SLP) and the simulation technique. A ceramic company in northern Thailand is selected as a case study. Three ceramic products including roof tiles, wall tiles and dishware are studied due to their highest production volume. Through the SLP approach, information regarding the number of departments and machines, the area of the plant, the frequency of movement and the distance between each department is collected for the analysis of the relationship between departments. Two plant layout designs are then proposed; the first one is derived from the Computerized Relationship Layout Planning algorithm (CORELAP), and the second one is the process layout. For selecting the most appropriate layout design, five criteria are considered including total distance, the average total process time of each unit produced, ease of movement, material flow and safety. To determine the distance and the average total process time per unit, Distance-Based Scoring and simulation techniques are conducted while the ease of movement, material flow and safety are rated based on whether the company satisfies each criterion. Employing the weight scoring technique, the results report that the CORELAP layout is the most suitable for further implementation due to its highest weighted score equal to 2.536 while the process layout receives 2.386. Implementing the CORELAP layout can reduce the total distance by 16.76% while the average total process time per unit of the CORELAP layout is not significantly different at the significance level of 0.05 as compared to the existing layout.","PeriodicalId":36269,"journal":{"name":"Production Engineering Archives","volume":"29 1","pages":"186 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Simulation Technique for Improving Plant Layout in Ceramic Factory\",\"authors\":\"C. Kasemset, Takron Opassuwan, Thanakit Tangsittikhun, Nititada Chaiyajina\",\"doi\":\"10.30657/pea.2023.29.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study aims to design and improve the plant layout of a ceramic factory by adopting Systematic Layout Planning (SLP) and the simulation technique. A ceramic company in northern Thailand is selected as a case study. Three ceramic products including roof tiles, wall tiles and dishware are studied due to their highest production volume. Through the SLP approach, information regarding the number of departments and machines, the area of the plant, the frequency of movement and the distance between each department is collected for the analysis of the relationship between departments. Two plant layout designs are then proposed; the first one is derived from the Computerized Relationship Layout Planning algorithm (CORELAP), and the second one is the process layout. For selecting the most appropriate layout design, five criteria are considered including total distance, the average total process time of each unit produced, ease of movement, material flow and safety. To determine the distance and the average total process time per unit, Distance-Based Scoring and simulation techniques are conducted while the ease of movement, material flow and safety are rated based on whether the company satisfies each criterion. Employing the weight scoring technique, the results report that the CORELAP layout is the most suitable for further implementation due to its highest weighted score equal to 2.536 while the process layout receives 2.386. Implementing the CORELAP layout can reduce the total distance by 16.76% while the average total process time per unit of the CORELAP layout is not significantly different at the significance level of 0.05 as compared to the existing layout.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Production Engineering Archives\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"186 - 194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Production Engineering Archives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2023.29.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production Engineering Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2023.29.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究旨在采用系统布局规划(SLP)和模拟技术来设计和改进陶瓷厂的工厂布局。选择泰国北部的一家陶瓷公司作为案例研究。研究了三种陶瓷产品,包括屋顶砖、墙砖和餐具,因为它们的产量最高。通过SLP方法,收集有关部门和机器数量、工厂面积、移动频率和每个部门之间距离的信息,以分析部门之间的关系。然后提出了两个工厂布局设计;第一个是从计算机化关系布局规划算法(CORELAP)导出的,第二个是过程布局。为了选择最合适的布局设计,考虑了五个标准,包括总距离、每个生产单元的平均总工艺时间、易于移动、材料流动和安全性。为了确定每单位的距离和平均总加工时间,我们采用了基于距离的评分和模拟技术,同时根据公司是否满足每一项标准来评定移动的方便性、物流和安全性。采用加权评分技术,结果报告CORELAP布局最适合进一步实施,因为其最高加权得分等于2.536,而工艺布局获得2.386。实施CORELAP布局可以将总距离减少16.76%,而与现有布局相比,CORELAP每单位的平均总处理时间在0.05的显著性水平上没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Simulation Technique for Improving Plant Layout in Ceramic Factory
Abstract This study aims to design and improve the plant layout of a ceramic factory by adopting Systematic Layout Planning (SLP) and the simulation technique. A ceramic company in northern Thailand is selected as a case study. Three ceramic products including roof tiles, wall tiles and dishware are studied due to their highest production volume. Through the SLP approach, information regarding the number of departments and machines, the area of the plant, the frequency of movement and the distance between each department is collected for the analysis of the relationship between departments. Two plant layout designs are then proposed; the first one is derived from the Computerized Relationship Layout Planning algorithm (CORELAP), and the second one is the process layout. For selecting the most appropriate layout design, five criteria are considered including total distance, the average total process time of each unit produced, ease of movement, material flow and safety. To determine the distance and the average total process time per unit, Distance-Based Scoring and simulation techniques are conducted while the ease of movement, material flow and safety are rated based on whether the company satisfies each criterion. Employing the weight scoring technique, the results report that the CORELAP layout is the most suitable for further implementation due to its highest weighted score equal to 2.536 while the process layout receives 2.386. Implementing the CORELAP layout can reduce the total distance by 16.76% while the average total process time per unit of the CORELAP layout is not significantly different at the significance level of 0.05 as compared to the existing layout.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Production Engineering Archives
Production Engineering Archives Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信