两个迪尔凯姆:加拿大社会学入门教材中的创始人与经典

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
P. Mallory, P. Cormack
{"title":"两个迪尔凯姆:加拿大社会学入门教材中的创始人与经典","authors":"P. Mallory, P. Cormack","doi":"10.29173/CJS29386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For contemporary Durkheim scholars, the presentation of Durkheimian sociology in introductory textbooks is notoriously flawed. In this article, we examine the presentation of Durkheim’s work in popular English-language Canadian sociology textbooks. We show that textbooks present two distinct “Durkheims.” First, they characterize him as a founder of the discipline and the sociological project of challenging common-sense explanations of social life. Second, Durkheim appears as the father of structural functionalism who advocates a conservative, integrating vision of society. We argue that to understand why these two versions of Durkheim persist in sociology textbooks, we must appreciate the symbolic place of classical authors in the discipline. The two “textbook Durkheims” endure because they operate as symbols for both the coherence and divisions of the discipline. We suggest that integrating contemporary Durkheimian scholarship into textbooks would require revising conventional textbook approaches of sorting classical authors as founders of contending sociological perspectives.","PeriodicalId":46469,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Sociology-Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie","volume":"43 1","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.29173/CJS29386","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Two Durkheims: Founders and Classics in Canadian Introductory Sociology Textbooks\",\"authors\":\"P. Mallory, P. Cormack\",\"doi\":\"10.29173/CJS29386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For contemporary Durkheim scholars, the presentation of Durkheimian sociology in introductory textbooks is notoriously flawed. In this article, we examine the presentation of Durkheim’s work in popular English-language Canadian sociology textbooks. We show that textbooks present two distinct “Durkheims.” First, they characterize him as a founder of the discipline and the sociological project of challenging common-sense explanations of social life. Second, Durkheim appears as the father of structural functionalism who advocates a conservative, integrating vision of society. We argue that to understand why these two versions of Durkheim persist in sociology textbooks, we must appreciate the symbolic place of classical authors in the discipline. The two “textbook Durkheims” endure because they operate as symbols for both the coherence and divisions of the discipline. We suggest that integrating contemporary Durkheimian scholarship into textbooks would require revising conventional textbook approaches of sorting classical authors as founders of contending sociological perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Sociology-Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.29173/CJS29386\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Sociology-Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29173/CJS29386\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Sociology-Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/CJS29386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对于当代的迪尔凯姆学者来说,入门教科书中迪尔凯姆社会学的介绍是出了名的有缺陷。在这篇文章中,我们考察了迪尔凯姆作品在加拿大流行的英语社会学教科书中的呈现。我们表明,教科书呈现了两个截然不同的“迪尔凯姆”。首先,他们将他描述为挑战社会生活常识性解释的学科和社会学项目的创始人。其次,迪尔凯姆以结构功能主义之父的身份出现,他倡导一种保守的、整合的社会观。我们认为,要理解为什么迪尔凯姆的这两个版本在社会学教科书中得以保留,我们必须欣赏经典作者在这一学科中的象征性地位。这两位“迪尔凯姆教科书”之所以经久不衰,是因为他们既是学科一致性的象征,也是学科分裂的象征。我们建议,将当代涂尔干学术整合到教科书中,需要修改传统的教科书方法,将古典作家分类为相互竞争的社会学观点的创始人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Two Durkheims: Founders and Classics in Canadian Introductory Sociology Textbooks
For contemporary Durkheim scholars, the presentation of Durkheimian sociology in introductory textbooks is notoriously flawed. In this article, we examine the presentation of Durkheim’s work in popular English-language Canadian sociology textbooks. We show that textbooks present two distinct “Durkheims.” First, they characterize him as a founder of the discipline and the sociological project of challenging common-sense explanations of social life. Second, Durkheim appears as the father of structural functionalism who advocates a conservative, integrating vision of society. We argue that to understand why these two versions of Durkheim persist in sociology textbooks, we must appreciate the symbolic place of classical authors in the discipline. The two “textbook Durkheims” endure because they operate as symbols for both the coherence and divisions of the discipline. We suggest that integrating contemporary Durkheimian scholarship into textbooks would require revising conventional textbook approaches of sorting classical authors as founders of contending sociological perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信