{"title":"以公平为幌子:利用白人教师的种族主义交流指导多样性课程修订","authors":"Chanelle Wilson, E. Soslau","doi":"10.1080/10476210.2020.1808610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Graduate programs for inservice teachers seeking additional credentialing often include a mandatory diversity course. One aim of these types of courses is to help teachers recognize and dismantle their racial biases in hopes that this self-reflection process will enable teachers to use antiracist teaching approaches and create classroom communities where all students feel safe, respected, and justly included in the classroom. We, two practitioner-researchers, both taught separate sections of one such mandatory graduate diversity course for inservice teachers. Instructor photos revealing our race (Author 1: Black, Author 2: White) were the only differences in the fully online, asynchronous course sections. After experiencing/witnessing graduate students’ racial bias towards the Black instructor captured via informal communication posted to the ‘Ask the Instructor’ board, we investigated whether students’ racial bias would be captured in graded coursework. Using both Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) and Critical Race Theory (CRT) we compared students’ work samples from each course section and found that students’ racial biases were not captured. Our findings help us problematize diversity courses hinged on broad-stroke equity frameworks. Thus, we use CRT to posit course revisions aimed at helping students develop post-racist mindsets and commit to anti-racist practices.","PeriodicalId":46594,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"56 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10476210.2020.1808610","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Masquerading as equitable: using white teachers’ racist communication to guide diversity course revisions\",\"authors\":\"Chanelle Wilson, E. Soslau\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10476210.2020.1808610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Graduate programs for inservice teachers seeking additional credentialing often include a mandatory diversity course. One aim of these types of courses is to help teachers recognize and dismantle their racial biases in hopes that this self-reflection process will enable teachers to use antiracist teaching approaches and create classroom communities where all students feel safe, respected, and justly included in the classroom. We, two practitioner-researchers, both taught separate sections of one such mandatory graduate diversity course for inservice teachers. Instructor photos revealing our race (Author 1: Black, Author 2: White) were the only differences in the fully online, asynchronous course sections. After experiencing/witnessing graduate students’ racial bias towards the Black instructor captured via informal communication posted to the ‘Ask the Instructor’ board, we investigated whether students’ racial bias would be captured in graded coursework. Using both Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) and Critical Race Theory (CRT) we compared students’ work samples from each course section and found that students’ racial biases were not captured. Our findings help us problematize diversity courses hinged on broad-stroke equity frameworks. Thus, we use CRT to posit course revisions aimed at helping students develop post-racist mindsets and commit to anti-racist practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"56 - 80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10476210.2020.1808610\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1808610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1808610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Masquerading as equitable: using white teachers’ racist communication to guide diversity course revisions
ABSTRACT Graduate programs for inservice teachers seeking additional credentialing often include a mandatory diversity course. One aim of these types of courses is to help teachers recognize and dismantle their racial biases in hopes that this self-reflection process will enable teachers to use antiracist teaching approaches and create classroom communities where all students feel safe, respected, and justly included in the classroom. We, two practitioner-researchers, both taught separate sections of one such mandatory graduate diversity course for inservice teachers. Instructor photos revealing our race (Author 1: Black, Author 2: White) were the only differences in the fully online, asynchronous course sections. After experiencing/witnessing graduate students’ racial bias towards the Black instructor captured via informal communication posted to the ‘Ask the Instructor’ board, we investigated whether students’ racial bias would be captured in graded coursework. Using both Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) and Critical Race Theory (CRT) we compared students’ work samples from each course section and found that students’ racial biases were not captured. Our findings help us problematize diversity courses hinged on broad-stroke equity frameworks. Thus, we use CRT to posit course revisions aimed at helping students develop post-racist mindsets and commit to anti-racist practices.
期刊介绍:
Teaching Education is an interdisciplinary forum for innovative practices and research in teacher education. Submission of manuscripts from educational researchers, teacher educators and practicing teachers is encouraged. Contributions are invited which address social and cultural, practical and theoretical aspects of teacher education in university-, college-, and school-based contexts. The journal’s focus is on the challenges and possibilities of rapid social and cultural change for teacher education and, more broadly, for the transformation of education. These challenges include: the impact of new cultures and globalisation on curriculum and pedagogy; new collaborations and partnerships between universities, schools and other social service agencies; the consequences of new community and family configurations for teachers’ work; generational and cultural change in schools and teacher education institutions; new technologies and education; and the impact of higher education policy and funding on teacher education. Manuscripts addressing critical and theory-based research or scholarly reflections and debate on contemporary issues related to teacher education, will be considered. Papers should attempt to present research, innovative theoretical and/or practical insights in relevant current literature and debate.