阿尔伯特亲王,1851年的伟大展览,与德国的联系

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
John R. Davis
{"title":"阿尔伯特亲王,1851年的伟大展览,与德国的联系","authors":"John R. Davis","doi":"10.1515/anger-2020-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In popular and general historical accounts, the Great Exhibition of 1851 is closely associated with Prince Albert, and Prince Albert is closely associated with the Great Exhibition. When one is being discussed, the other invariably appears.1 Recurrently and generally, Albert is believed to have come up with the exhibition idea, designed it, led it and somehow ‘owned’ it. Symptomatically, the Wikipedia webpage on the Great Exhibition currently states, in an anodyne and yet equally misleading fashion, that “The Great Exhibition was organised [...] by Prince Albert”.2 A closer examination of literature on, and discussion of, the matter reveals a perplexing level of uncertainty regarding the exact relationship between Albert and the Exhibition, however. Other figures, for example Henry Cole, are also sometimes recognised as having played a leading role, while the exhibition is also interpreted as a biproduct of industrialisation, Free Trade, and the High Victorian period. Still, the Exhibition, it is widely if naively believed, was Albert’s project. These associations are also intermingled, reflected and reinforced in material culture. Significantly, many of the memorials erected in Albert’s memory after his untimely death in 1861 display and reinforce themes suggesting the centrality of the exhibition to his life’s work and his responsibility for it. Foremost among them is that in Hyde Park overlooking ‘Albertopolis’ and Exhibition Road.3 As these memorials show, this way of thinking, lazy and superficial as it may be, has a long history. In fact, even as the exhibition was being organised and taking place, many people presented or saw it as Albert’s project, and claims were made at the time, even by those associated with the exhibition, that Albert had","PeriodicalId":40371,"journal":{"name":"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen","volume":"13 1","pages":"183 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/anger-2020-0012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prince Albert, the Great Exhibition of 1851, and the German Connection\",\"authors\":\"John R. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/anger-2020-0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In popular and general historical accounts, the Great Exhibition of 1851 is closely associated with Prince Albert, and Prince Albert is closely associated with the Great Exhibition. When one is being discussed, the other invariably appears.1 Recurrently and generally, Albert is believed to have come up with the exhibition idea, designed it, led it and somehow ‘owned’ it. Symptomatically, the Wikipedia webpage on the Great Exhibition currently states, in an anodyne and yet equally misleading fashion, that “The Great Exhibition was organised [...] by Prince Albert”.2 A closer examination of literature on, and discussion of, the matter reveals a perplexing level of uncertainty regarding the exact relationship between Albert and the Exhibition, however. Other figures, for example Henry Cole, are also sometimes recognised as having played a leading role, while the exhibition is also interpreted as a biproduct of industrialisation, Free Trade, and the High Victorian period. Still, the Exhibition, it is widely if naively believed, was Albert’s project. These associations are also intermingled, reflected and reinforced in material culture. Significantly, many of the memorials erected in Albert’s memory after his untimely death in 1861 display and reinforce themes suggesting the centrality of the exhibition to his life’s work and his responsibility for it. Foremost among them is that in Hyde Park overlooking ‘Albertopolis’ and Exhibition Road.3 As these memorials show, this way of thinking, lazy and superficial as it may be, has a long history. In fact, even as the exhibition was being organised and taking place, many people presented or saw it as Albert’s project, and claims were made at the time, even by those associated with the exhibition, that Albert had\",\"PeriodicalId\":40371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/anger-2020-0012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/anger-2020-0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/anger-2020-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在通俗和一般的历史记载中,1851年的大展览与阿尔伯特亲王密切相关,阿尔伯特亲王与大展览密切相关。当一个被讨论时,另一个总是会出现。1通常,阿尔伯特被认为是想出了展览的想法,设计了它,领导了它,并以某种方式“拥有”了它。有症状的是,大展览的维基百科网页目前以一种温和但同样具有误导性的方式表示,“伟大的展览是由阿尔伯特亲王组织的[…]。2然而,对此事的文献和讨论表明,阿尔伯特与展览之间的确切关系存在着令人困惑的不确定性。其他人物,如亨利·科尔,有时也被认为发挥了主导作用,而展览也被解释为工业化、自由贸易和维多利亚时代的双重产物。尽管如此,人们普遍认为这个展览是阿尔伯特的项目。这些联想也在物质文化中交织、反映和强化。值得注意的是,在阿尔伯特于1861年英年早逝后,为纪念他而竖立的许多纪念碑都展示并强化了展览对他一生工作的中心地位及其责任的主题。其中最重要的是在海德公园俯瞰“阿尔贝托波利斯”和展览路。3正如这些纪念碑所表明的那样,这种思维方式可能是懒惰和肤浅的,有着悠久的历史。事实上,即使在展览的组织和举办过程中,许多人也将其视为阿尔伯特的项目,当时甚至与展览有关的人都声称阿尔伯特
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prince Albert, the Great Exhibition of 1851, and the German Connection
In popular and general historical accounts, the Great Exhibition of 1851 is closely associated with Prince Albert, and Prince Albert is closely associated with the Great Exhibition. When one is being discussed, the other invariably appears.1 Recurrently and generally, Albert is believed to have come up with the exhibition idea, designed it, led it and somehow ‘owned’ it. Symptomatically, the Wikipedia webpage on the Great Exhibition currently states, in an anodyne and yet equally misleading fashion, that “The Great Exhibition was organised [...] by Prince Albert”.2 A closer examination of literature on, and discussion of, the matter reveals a perplexing level of uncertainty regarding the exact relationship between Albert and the Exhibition, however. Other figures, for example Henry Cole, are also sometimes recognised as having played a leading role, while the exhibition is also interpreted as a biproduct of industrialisation, Free Trade, and the High Victorian period. Still, the Exhibition, it is widely if naively believed, was Albert’s project. These associations are also intermingled, reflected and reinforced in material culture. Significantly, many of the memorials erected in Albert’s memory after his untimely death in 1861 display and reinforce themes suggesting the centrality of the exhibition to his life’s work and his responsibility for it. Foremost among them is that in Hyde Park overlooking ‘Albertopolis’ and Exhibition Road.3 As these memorials show, this way of thinking, lazy and superficial as it may be, has a long history. In fact, even as the exhibition was being organised and taking place, many people presented or saw it as Albert’s project, and claims were made at the time, even by those associated with the exhibition, that Albert had
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信