创造性场所营造价值的确定与表现

IF 1.8 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
J. Vaughan, K. Maund, T. Gajendran, J. Lloyd, Catherine Smith, Michael Cohen
{"title":"创造性场所营造价值的确定与表现","authors":"J. Vaughan, K. Maund, T. Gajendran, J. Lloyd, Catherine Smith, Michael Cohen","doi":"10.1108/jpmd-07-2019-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to address the research gap about value in the holistic discourse of creative placemaking. It identifies and synthesises the often discounted social and environmental values of creative placemaking along with typically emphasised economic values.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper builds upon two research phases; first, a review and extraction of creative placemaking value indicators from relevant current urban, cultural and planning literature; and second, the identification of relevant, practice-based, value indicators through interviews with 23 placemaking experts including practitioners, urban planners, developers and place managers from the two largest cities of NSW, Australia; Sydney and Newcastle.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study identifies three broad thematics for valuing creative placemaking along with several sub-categories of qualitative and quantitative indicators. These indicators reveal the holistic value of creative placemaking for its key stakeholders, including expert placemakers, designers, building developers, government and community groups. A key conclusion of the research is the need for tools that grasp the interconnected, and at times conflicting, nature of placemaking’s social, economic and environmental outcomes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhile a variety of value indicators exist to understand the need for ongoing resourcing of creative placemaking, stakeholders identified the limitations of current approaches to determine, represent and appraise the value of creative placemaking. The indicators of value proposed in this research consolidate and extend current discourse about the value of creative placemaking specifically. The indicators themselves have profound practical implications for how creative placemaking is conceived, executed and evaluated. Theoretically, the study builds on the deep relationships between values and practice in creative placemaking, as well as critiquing narrow forms of evaluation that entrench economic benefits over other outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":46966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Place Management and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining and representing value in creative placemaking\",\"authors\":\"J. Vaughan, K. Maund, T. Gajendran, J. Lloyd, Catherine Smith, Michael Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jpmd-07-2019-0069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to address the research gap about value in the holistic discourse of creative placemaking. It identifies and synthesises the often discounted social and environmental values of creative placemaking along with typically emphasised economic values.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper builds upon two research phases; first, a review and extraction of creative placemaking value indicators from relevant current urban, cultural and planning literature; and second, the identification of relevant, practice-based, value indicators through interviews with 23 placemaking experts including practitioners, urban planners, developers and place managers from the two largest cities of NSW, Australia; Sydney and Newcastle.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study identifies three broad thematics for valuing creative placemaking along with several sub-categories of qualitative and quantitative indicators. These indicators reveal the holistic value of creative placemaking for its key stakeholders, including expert placemakers, designers, building developers, government and community groups. A key conclusion of the research is the need for tools that grasp the interconnected, and at times conflicting, nature of placemaking’s social, economic and environmental outcomes.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nWhile a variety of value indicators exist to understand the need for ongoing resourcing of creative placemaking, stakeholders identified the limitations of current approaches to determine, represent and appraise the value of creative placemaking. The indicators of value proposed in this research consolidate and extend current discourse about the value of creative placemaking specifically. The indicators themselves have profound practical implications for how creative placemaking is conceived, executed and evaluated. Theoretically, the study builds on the deep relationships between values and practice in creative placemaking, as well as critiquing narrow forms of evaluation that entrench economic benefits over other outcomes.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Place Management and Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Place Management and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-07-2019-0069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Place Management and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-07-2019-0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的本研究旨在解决创造性场所营造整体话语中关于价值的研究空白。它识别并综合了创意场所制作中经常被忽视的社会和环境价值,以及通常被强调的经济价值。设计/方法论/方法本文建立在两个研究阶段之上;首先,从当前相关的城市、文化和规划文献中回顾和提取创造性的选址价值指标;第二,通过采访23位场所制作专家,包括澳大利亚新南威尔士州两个最大城市的从业者、城市规划师、开发商和场所管理者,确定相关的、基于实践的价值指标;Sydney和Newcastle.Findings这项研究确定了三个评价创意场所制作的广泛主题,以及几个定性和定量指标的子类别。这些指标揭示了创意场所制作对关键利益相关者的整体价值,包括专业场所制作者、设计师、建筑开发商、政府和社区团体。这项研究的一个关键结论是,需要掌握选址的社会、经济和环境结果的相互关联、有时相互冲突的性质的工具。创意/价值虽然存在各种价值指标来理解创意场所制作持续资源的必要性,但利益相关者发现了当前确定、代表和评估创意场所制作价值的方法的局限性。本研究中提出的价值指标具体巩固和扩展了当前关于创造性场所制作价值的论述。这些指标本身对创意场所的构思、执行和评估具有深远的实际意义。从理论上讲,这项研究建立在创造性场所制作的价值观和实践之间的深层关系之上,并批评了将经济效益巩固在其他结果之上的狭隘评估形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining and representing value in creative placemaking
Purpose This study aims to address the research gap about value in the holistic discourse of creative placemaking. It identifies and synthesises the often discounted social and environmental values of creative placemaking along with typically emphasised economic values. Design/methodology/approach This paper builds upon two research phases; first, a review and extraction of creative placemaking value indicators from relevant current urban, cultural and planning literature; and second, the identification of relevant, practice-based, value indicators through interviews with 23 placemaking experts including practitioners, urban planners, developers and place managers from the two largest cities of NSW, Australia; Sydney and Newcastle. Findings This study identifies three broad thematics for valuing creative placemaking along with several sub-categories of qualitative and quantitative indicators. These indicators reveal the holistic value of creative placemaking for its key stakeholders, including expert placemakers, designers, building developers, government and community groups. A key conclusion of the research is the need for tools that grasp the interconnected, and at times conflicting, nature of placemaking’s social, economic and environmental outcomes. Originality/value While a variety of value indicators exist to understand the need for ongoing resourcing of creative placemaking, stakeholders identified the limitations of current approaches to determine, represent and appraise the value of creative placemaking. The indicators of value proposed in this research consolidate and extend current discourse about the value of creative placemaking specifically. The indicators themselves have profound practical implications for how creative placemaking is conceived, executed and evaluated. Theoretically, the study builds on the deep relationships between values and practice in creative placemaking, as well as critiquing narrow forms of evaluation that entrench economic benefits over other outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Place Management and Development
Journal of Place Management and Development HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信