D. Paillin, J. Tupan, Jacobus Paillin, W. Latuny, V. Lawalata
{"title":"可持续金枪鱼供应链中的风险评估和风险缓解","authors":"D. Paillin, J. Tupan, Jacobus Paillin, W. Latuny, V. Lawalata","doi":"10.22306/al.v9i1.270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to conduct a risk assessment and minimize the risk of sustainable tuna supply chains in Ambon. The House of Risk (HOR) approach was utilized in this study to identify risk occurrences and risk agents in three aspects of sustainability. The study results identified 15 risk events and 26 risk agents consisting of four risk events and five risk agents on the environmental dimension, five risk events and eleven risk agents on the social dimension, six risk events, and ten risk agents on the economic dimension. The HOR phase I shows that the risk agent with the highest Aggregat Risk Priority (ARP) value is the lack of environmental management system standards (A4), and the risk agent with the lowest ARP value is inhumane treatment/harassment (A12). Based on the Pareto principle, 7 Risk Agents will be prioritized to be handled according to the highest ARP value, such as lack of environmental management system standards (4170), lack of quality control inspection (3790), lack of maintenance management (3346), lack of quality control from suppliers (3000), lack of enthusiasm for work (2984), decreased level of discipline (2832). The internal communication system of the company is poor (2538). Furthermore, 15 mitigating techniques are proposed. Twelve mitigation technique steps are chosen from 15 recommended solutions to prevent the causes of risk based on the effectiveness to difficulty (ETD) value from HOR phase II.","PeriodicalId":36880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Logistica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK MITIGATION IN A SUSTAINABLE TUNA SUPPLY CHAIN\",\"authors\":\"D. Paillin, J. Tupan, Jacobus Paillin, W. Latuny, V. Lawalata\",\"doi\":\"10.22306/al.v9i1.270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to conduct a risk assessment and minimize the risk of sustainable tuna supply chains in Ambon. The House of Risk (HOR) approach was utilized in this study to identify risk occurrences and risk agents in three aspects of sustainability. The study results identified 15 risk events and 26 risk agents consisting of four risk events and five risk agents on the environmental dimension, five risk events and eleven risk agents on the social dimension, six risk events, and ten risk agents on the economic dimension. The HOR phase I shows that the risk agent with the highest Aggregat Risk Priority (ARP) value is the lack of environmental management system standards (A4), and the risk agent with the lowest ARP value is inhumane treatment/harassment (A12). Based on the Pareto principle, 7 Risk Agents will be prioritized to be handled according to the highest ARP value, such as lack of environmental management system standards (4170), lack of quality control inspection (3790), lack of maintenance management (3346), lack of quality control from suppliers (3000), lack of enthusiasm for work (2984), decreased level of discipline (2832). The internal communication system of the company is poor (2538). Furthermore, 15 mitigating techniques are proposed. Twelve mitigation technique steps are chosen from 15 recommended solutions to prevent the causes of risk based on the effectiveness to difficulty (ETD) value from HOR phase II.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Logistica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Logistica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v9i1.270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Logistica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v9i1.270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本研究旨在进行风险评估,并将安汶可持续金枪鱼供应链的风险降至最低。本研究采用风险之家(House of Risk, HOR)方法,在可持续性的三个方面识别风险发生和风险动因。研究结果确定了15个风险事件和26个风险因子,其中环境维度有4个风险事件和5个风险因子,社会维度有5个风险事件和11个风险因子,经济维度有6个风险事件和10个风险因子。HOR阶段I显示,总风险优先级(ARP)值最高的风险动因是缺乏环境管理体系标准(A4), ARP值最低的风险动因是不人道待遇/骚扰(A12)。根据帕累托原则,将7个风险代理按最高ARP值优先处理,如缺乏环境管理体系标准(4170),缺乏质量控制检查(3790),缺乏维修管理(3346),缺乏供应商质量控制(3000),缺乏工作热情(2984),纪律水平下降(2832)。公司内部沟通系统差(2538)。此外,还提出了15种缓解技术。从15个建议的解决方案中选择了12个缓解技术步骤,以根据HOR第二阶段的有效性与难度(ETD)值来预防风险原因。
RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK MITIGATION IN A SUSTAINABLE TUNA SUPPLY CHAIN
This study aimed to conduct a risk assessment and minimize the risk of sustainable tuna supply chains in Ambon. The House of Risk (HOR) approach was utilized in this study to identify risk occurrences and risk agents in three aspects of sustainability. The study results identified 15 risk events and 26 risk agents consisting of four risk events and five risk agents on the environmental dimension, five risk events and eleven risk agents on the social dimension, six risk events, and ten risk agents on the economic dimension. The HOR phase I shows that the risk agent with the highest Aggregat Risk Priority (ARP) value is the lack of environmental management system standards (A4), and the risk agent with the lowest ARP value is inhumane treatment/harassment (A12). Based on the Pareto principle, 7 Risk Agents will be prioritized to be handled according to the highest ARP value, such as lack of environmental management system standards (4170), lack of quality control inspection (3790), lack of maintenance management (3346), lack of quality control from suppliers (3000), lack of enthusiasm for work (2984), decreased level of discipline (2832). The internal communication system of the company is poor (2538). Furthermore, 15 mitigating techniques are proposed. Twelve mitigation technique steps are chosen from 15 recommended solutions to prevent the causes of risk based on the effectiveness to difficulty (ETD) value from HOR phase II.