{"title":"EAU 2022对肾细胞癌的重点研究","authors":"T. V. van Oostenbrugge, P. Mulders","doi":"10.3233/kca-220013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most debated topic on renal cell carcinoma 9 (RCC) during the EAU 2022 in Amsterdam was 10 the 30 month follow-up update of the Keynote-564 11 trial. In this trial patients with intermediate and high 12 risk for recurrence after nephrectomy with curative 13 intent, and with no evidence of disease at the time of 14 inclusion were randomized between adjuvant treat15 ment with pembroluzimab for 1 year or placebo. 16 A small group of patients with M1 disease who 17 underwent metastasectomy were also included. In 18 the intermediate risk (pT2 with Grade 4 or sarco19 matoid differentiation, N0, M0; pT3, any grade, N0, 20 M0), the high risk (T4, any grade, N0, M0; any pT, 21 any grade, N+, M0) and M1 (no evidence of dis22 ease after surgery) groups disease-free survival was 23 better with pembrolizumab compared with placebo 24 (HR 0·63 [95% CI 0·50–0·80]). Although the median 25 disease-free survival was not reached in any of the 26 groups, the estimated number of participants alive 27 and disease free after 30 months was 75·2% (95% CI 28 70·8–79·1) in the pembrolizumab group and 65·5% 29 (60·9–69·7) in the placebo group [1]. 30 Despite these positive findings the study was much 31 debated during several highlight sessio s. The sur32 vival benefit for the intermediate risk group is less 33 compared to the high risk and M1 groups. This 34 was especially true for those patients with a moder35","PeriodicalId":17823,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EAU 2022 Highlights on Renal Cell Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"T. V. van Oostenbrugge, P. Mulders\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/kca-220013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most debated topic on renal cell carcinoma 9 (RCC) during the EAU 2022 in Amsterdam was 10 the 30 month follow-up update of the Keynote-564 11 trial. In this trial patients with intermediate and high 12 risk for recurrence after nephrectomy with curative 13 intent, and with no evidence of disease at the time of 14 inclusion were randomized between adjuvant treat15 ment with pembroluzimab for 1 year or placebo. 16 A small group of patients with M1 disease who 17 underwent metastasectomy were also included. In 18 the intermediate risk (pT2 with Grade 4 or sarco19 matoid differentiation, N0, M0; pT3, any grade, N0, 20 M0), the high risk (T4, any grade, N0, M0; any pT, 21 any grade, N+, M0) and M1 (no evidence of dis22 ease after surgery) groups disease-free survival was 23 better with pembrolizumab compared with placebo 24 (HR 0·63 [95% CI 0·50–0·80]). Although the median 25 disease-free survival was not reached in any of the 26 groups, the estimated number of participants alive 27 and disease free after 30 months was 75·2% (95% CI 28 70·8–79·1) in the pembrolizumab group and 65·5% 29 (60·9–69·7) in the placebo group [1]. 30 Despite these positive findings the study was much 31 debated during several highlight sessio s. The sur32 vival benefit for the intermediate risk group is less 33 compared to the high risk and M1 groups. This 34 was especially true for those patients with a moder35\",\"PeriodicalId\":17823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/kca-220013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/kca-220013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在阿姆斯特丹EAU 2022期间,关于肾细胞癌(RCC)最具争议的话题是Keynote-564试验的30个月随访更新。在这项试验中,具有治疗目的的肾切除术后复发中高风险且在纳入试验时无疾病证据的患者被随机分为pembroluzimab辅助治疗1年或安慰剂组。还有一小部分M1患者接受了转移瘤切除术。18例中危患者(pT2伴4级或肉瘤样分化,N0, M0;pT3,任意分级,N0, 20m0),高风险(T4,任意分级,N0, M0;任何pT组、任何分级组、N+组、M0组和M1组(手术后无疾病缓解的证据),派姆单抗组的无病生存率优于安慰剂组(HR 0.63 [95% CI 0.50 - 0.80])。虽然26组中的任何一组均未达到中位无病生存期,但在30个月后,派姆单抗组的存活和无病存活的估计人数为75.2% (95% CI 2870.8 - 70.1),安慰剂组的存活和无病存活的估计人数为65.5%(60.9 - 60.7)。尽管有这些积极的发现,但在几次重点会议上,这项研究仍存在很多争议。与高风险和M1组相比,中等风险组的生存获益更少。对于那些患有中度糖尿病的患者尤其如此
The most debated topic on renal cell carcinoma 9 (RCC) during the EAU 2022 in Amsterdam was 10 the 30 month follow-up update of the Keynote-564 11 trial. In this trial patients with intermediate and high 12 risk for recurrence after nephrectomy with curative 13 intent, and with no evidence of disease at the time of 14 inclusion were randomized between adjuvant treat15 ment with pembroluzimab for 1 year or placebo. 16 A small group of patients with M1 disease who 17 underwent metastasectomy were also included. In 18 the intermediate risk (pT2 with Grade 4 or sarco19 matoid differentiation, N0, M0; pT3, any grade, N0, 20 M0), the high risk (T4, any grade, N0, M0; any pT, 21 any grade, N+, M0) and M1 (no evidence of dis22 ease after surgery) groups disease-free survival was 23 better with pembrolizumab compared with placebo 24 (HR 0·63 [95% CI 0·50–0·80]). Although the median 25 disease-free survival was not reached in any of the 26 groups, the estimated number of participants alive 27 and disease free after 30 months was 75·2% (95% CI 28 70·8–79·1) in the pembrolizumab group and 65·5% 29 (60·9–69·7) in the placebo group [1]. 30 Despite these positive findings the study was much 31 debated during several highlight sessio s. The sur32 vival benefit for the intermediate risk group is less 33 compared to the high risk and M1 groups. This 34 was especially true for those patients with a moder35