走向兰契批判理论

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
M. Lampert
{"title":"走向兰契批判理论","authors":"M. Lampert","doi":"10.5195/jffp.2019.891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While Jacques Ranciere has never been affiliated in any way with the Institute for Social Research, this article examines the extent to which his work could be considered “Critical Theory” in the sense most closely associated with the Frankfurt School tradition. I argue that Ranciere’s work is not critical theory in this narrow sense; I further lay out a kind of “Rancierean” criticism of the very project of Frankfurt School Critical Theory. This in turn allows me to sketch out a version of Critical Theory that might survive a Rancierean critique. Even by this renewed conception, however, I argue that Ranciere’s own work still cannot be considered a project of Critical Theory; but I finish the essay by laying out what a possible “Rancierean” Critical Theory might look like, and why I think such a project would be valuable.","PeriodicalId":41846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","volume":"27 1","pages":"95-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Rancièrean Critical Theory\",\"authors\":\"M. Lampert\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/jffp.2019.891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While Jacques Ranciere has never been affiliated in any way with the Institute for Social Research, this article examines the extent to which his work could be considered “Critical Theory” in the sense most closely associated with the Frankfurt School tradition. I argue that Ranciere’s work is not critical theory in this narrow sense; I further lay out a kind of “Rancierean” criticism of the very project of Frankfurt School Critical Theory. This in turn allows me to sketch out a version of Critical Theory that might survive a Rancierean critique. Even by this renewed conception, however, I argue that Ranciere’s own work still cannot be considered a project of Critical Theory; but I finish the essay by laying out what a possible “Rancierean” Critical Theory might look like, and why I think such a project would be valuable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"95-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2019.891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2019.891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然雅克·朗西埃从未以任何方式隶属于社会研究所,但本文考察了他的工作在多大程度上可以被认为是与法兰克福学派传统最密切相关的“批判理论”。我认为朗西埃的作品不是狭义的批判理论;我进一步提出了一种对法兰克福学派批判理论项目的“朗西耶式”批判。这反过来又使我能够勾勒出一个可能在朗西埃式批判中幸存下来的批判理论版本。然而,即使通过这种更新的概念,我认为朗西埃自己的作品仍然不能被认为是批判理论的一个项目;但在文章的最后,我列出了一个可能的“朗西里尔式”批判理论是什么样子的,以及为什么我认为这样一个项目是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a Rancièrean Critical Theory
While Jacques Ranciere has never been affiliated in any way with the Institute for Social Research, this article examines the extent to which his work could be considered “Critical Theory” in the sense most closely associated with the Frankfurt School tradition. I argue that Ranciere’s work is not critical theory in this narrow sense; I further lay out a kind of “Rancierean” criticism of the very project of Frankfurt School Critical Theory. This in turn allows me to sketch out a version of Critical Theory that might survive a Rancierean critique. Even by this renewed conception, however, I argue that Ranciere’s own work still cannot be considered a project of Critical Theory; but I finish the essay by laying out what a possible “Rancierean” Critical Theory might look like, and why I think such a project would be valuable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信