边缘型人格困难的心理教育初探

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
F. Rocca, Chloe Finamore, S. Stamp, Fiona Kuhn-Thompson, O. Dale
{"title":"边缘型人格困难的心理教育初探","authors":"F. Rocca, Chloe Finamore, S. Stamp, Fiona Kuhn-Thompson, O. Dale","doi":"10.1108/MHRJ-04-2020-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nNational Institute for Clinical and Health Excellence guidelines (2009) state that low intensity psychological interventions should not be used for borderline personality disorder. However, an emerging body of evidence suggests brief interventions such as psychoeducation may be relevant for those presenting with borderline personality difficulties. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of learning about thinking, emotions and relationships (LATER), a co-produced psychoeducation programme for borderline personality difficulties in a community-based setting.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nParticipants (n = 125) self-referred to LATER, a group-based psychoeducation programme delivered at the [NHS Trust] Recovery College. Participants were assessed pre- and post-intervention using the tailor-made psychological education group evaluation scale, the borderline evaluation of severity over time and work and social adjustment scale. Paired t-tests were conducted on pre- and post-scores, and effect sizes were calculated.\n\n\nFindings\nAfter LATER, participants reported a significant decrease in negative thoughts and feelings, destructive behaviours and overall borderline symptom severity, but no significant increase in positive behaviours. Significant decreases were found in areas of work and social impairment. Participants’ overall understanding of personality difficulties significantly improved. Effect sizes were small to moderate.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nLimitations of the study include the lack of a control group, adjustment for confounders and follow-up. Replication with a more robust methodology is needed.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the evidence for the usefulness of brief interventions for personality difficulties, particularly in the context of a stepped model of care and adds to the research on co-production.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychoeducation for borderline personality difficulties: a preliminary study\",\"authors\":\"F. Rocca, Chloe Finamore, S. Stamp, Fiona Kuhn-Thompson, O. Dale\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/MHRJ-04-2020-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nNational Institute for Clinical and Health Excellence guidelines (2009) state that low intensity psychological interventions should not be used for borderline personality disorder. However, an emerging body of evidence suggests brief interventions such as psychoeducation may be relevant for those presenting with borderline personality difficulties. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of learning about thinking, emotions and relationships (LATER), a co-produced psychoeducation programme for borderline personality difficulties in a community-based setting.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nParticipants (n = 125) self-referred to LATER, a group-based psychoeducation programme delivered at the [NHS Trust] Recovery College. Participants were assessed pre- and post-intervention using the tailor-made psychological education group evaluation scale, the borderline evaluation of severity over time and work and social adjustment scale. Paired t-tests were conducted on pre- and post-scores, and effect sizes were calculated.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAfter LATER, participants reported a significant decrease in negative thoughts and feelings, destructive behaviours and overall borderline symptom severity, but no significant increase in positive behaviours. Significant decreases were found in areas of work and social impairment. Participants’ overall understanding of personality difficulties significantly improved. Effect sizes were small to moderate.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nLimitations of the study include the lack of a control group, adjustment for confounders and follow-up. Replication with a more robust methodology is needed.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study contributes to the evidence for the usefulness of brief interventions for personality difficulties, particularly in the context of a stepped model of care and adds to the research on co-production.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health Review Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health Review Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-04-2020-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-04-2020-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的国家临床与健康卓越研究所指南(2009)指出,低强度心理干预不应用于边缘型人格障碍。然而,一组新出现的证据表明,心理教育等简短的干预措施可能与那些出现边缘人格困难的人有关。本研究的目的是评估学习思维、情绪和关系(LATER)的益处,这是一项针对社区环境中边缘人格困难的联合心理教育计划。设计/方法论/方法参与者(n = 125)自荐LATER,这是一个在[英国国家医疗服务体系信托]康复学院提供的基于群体的心理教育项目。参与者在干预前和干预后使用量身定制的心理教育小组评估量表、严重程度随时间变化的临界评估量表以及工作和社会适应量表进行评估。对前后评分进行配对t检验,并计算影响大小。研究结果之后,参与者报告说负面想法和感受、破坏性行为和总体临界症状严重程度显著减少,但积极行为没有显著增加。工作和社会障碍领域的失业率显著下降。参与者对人格困难的总体理解显著提高。效果大小从小到中等。研究局限性/含义研究的局限性包括缺乏对照组、对混杂因素的调整和随访。需要使用更稳健的方法进行复制。独创性/价值这项研究有助于证明短暂干预对人格困难的有用性,特别是在阶梯式护理模式的背景下,并增加了对共同生产的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychoeducation for borderline personality difficulties: a preliminary study
Purpose National Institute for Clinical and Health Excellence guidelines (2009) state that low intensity psychological interventions should not be used for borderline personality disorder. However, an emerging body of evidence suggests brief interventions such as psychoeducation may be relevant for those presenting with borderline personality difficulties. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of learning about thinking, emotions and relationships (LATER), a co-produced psychoeducation programme for borderline personality difficulties in a community-based setting. Design/methodology/approach Participants (n = 125) self-referred to LATER, a group-based psychoeducation programme delivered at the [NHS Trust] Recovery College. Participants were assessed pre- and post-intervention using the tailor-made psychological education group evaluation scale, the borderline evaluation of severity over time and work and social adjustment scale. Paired t-tests were conducted on pre- and post-scores, and effect sizes were calculated. Findings After LATER, participants reported a significant decrease in negative thoughts and feelings, destructive behaviours and overall borderline symptom severity, but no significant increase in positive behaviours. Significant decreases were found in areas of work and social impairment. Participants’ overall understanding of personality difficulties significantly improved. Effect sizes were small to moderate. Research limitations/implications Limitations of the study include the lack of a control group, adjustment for confounders and follow-up. Replication with a more robust methodology is needed. Originality/value This study contributes to the evidence for the usefulness of brief interventions for personality difficulties, particularly in the context of a stepped model of care and adds to the research on co-production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信