13.以弗所书、歌罗西书和腓利门

IF 0.5 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Gary W. Burnett
{"title":"13.以弗所书、歌罗西书和腓利门","authors":"Gary W. Burnett","doi":"10.1177/0142064X221104335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a short commentary by theologian Michael Allen, part of Brazos’s Theological Commentary on the Bible series. The series is founded on the idea that ‘dogma clarifies rather than obscures’ and non-biblical scholars have been deliberately chosen as authors because ‘war is too important to leave to the generals’. This approach is evident in Allen’s thorough-going Reformed theological approach to Ephesians where there are a limited number of engagements with biblical scholarship. I confess I did find it a little strange reading a discussion of an ancient text with little interaction with the social setting of the letter in the first century, notwithstanding the letter’s general nature. Allen seeks to interpret the letter within its canonical context and ‘within the communion of the saints’, and, to be sure, there are various interesting discussions along the way of historical interpretations of the text and theology. The commentary dives straight into the text, without any of the usual introductory background material and proceeds by discussing small blocks of text in six chapters, one for each chapter of the letter. Although the commentary is aimed at pastors, preachers and a general Christian readership, the writing style does not make for easy reading – phrases like ‘missive into ecclesiastical calm’, ‘prudence in divine pedagogy’ and ‘our present yearnings must be transfigured’ are rather typical of the author’s mode of expression. The difficulties of untangling Paul’s long sentences in his letter are perhaps not best served by this.","PeriodicalId":44754,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of the New Testament","volume":"44 1","pages":"60 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"13. Ephesians, Colossians & Philemon\",\"authors\":\"Gary W. Burnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0142064X221104335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a short commentary by theologian Michael Allen, part of Brazos’s Theological Commentary on the Bible series. The series is founded on the idea that ‘dogma clarifies rather than obscures’ and non-biblical scholars have been deliberately chosen as authors because ‘war is too important to leave to the generals’. This approach is evident in Allen’s thorough-going Reformed theological approach to Ephesians where there are a limited number of engagements with biblical scholarship. I confess I did find it a little strange reading a discussion of an ancient text with little interaction with the social setting of the letter in the first century, notwithstanding the letter’s general nature. Allen seeks to interpret the letter within its canonical context and ‘within the communion of the saints’, and, to be sure, there are various interesting discussions along the way of historical interpretations of the text and theology. The commentary dives straight into the text, without any of the usual introductory background material and proceeds by discussing small blocks of text in six chapters, one for each chapter of the letter. Although the commentary is aimed at pastors, preachers and a general Christian readership, the writing style does not make for easy reading – phrases like ‘missive into ecclesiastical calm’, ‘prudence in divine pedagogy’ and ‘our present yearnings must be transfigured’ are rather typical of the author’s mode of expression. The difficulties of untangling Paul’s long sentences in his letter are perhaps not best served by this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the Study of the New Testament\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"60 - 62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the Study of the New Testament\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X221104335\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of the New Testament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X221104335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是神学家迈克尔·艾伦的一篇简短评论,是布拉佐斯《圣经神学评论》系列的一部分。该系列基于“教条澄清而非模糊”的理念,非圣经学者被故意选为作者,因为“战争太重要了,不能留给将军们”。这种方法在艾伦对《以弗所书》的彻底改革派神学方法中表现得很明显,在那里,圣经学术的参与数量有限。我承认,尽管这封信具有普遍的性质,但我确实觉得阅读一篇关于古代文本的讨论有点奇怪,它与一世纪这封信的社会背景几乎没有互动。艾伦试图在其规范背景下和“在圣人的交流中”解释这封信,可以肯定的是,在对文本和神学的历史解释过程中,有各种有趣的讨论。评注直接切入正文,没有任何通常的介绍性背景材料,并分六章讨论小块文本,信中每章一小段。尽管这篇评论是针对牧师、传教士和普通基督徒读者的,但其写作风格并不容易阅读——诸如“进入教会平静的信件”、“神圣教育学中的谨慎”和“我们现在的渴望必须改变”等短语是作者典型的表达方式。解开保罗信中长句的困难也许并不能最好地解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
13. Ephesians, Colossians & Philemon
This is a short commentary by theologian Michael Allen, part of Brazos’s Theological Commentary on the Bible series. The series is founded on the idea that ‘dogma clarifies rather than obscures’ and non-biblical scholars have been deliberately chosen as authors because ‘war is too important to leave to the generals’. This approach is evident in Allen’s thorough-going Reformed theological approach to Ephesians where there are a limited number of engagements with biblical scholarship. I confess I did find it a little strange reading a discussion of an ancient text with little interaction with the social setting of the letter in the first century, notwithstanding the letter’s general nature. Allen seeks to interpret the letter within its canonical context and ‘within the communion of the saints’, and, to be sure, there are various interesting discussions along the way of historical interpretations of the text and theology. The commentary dives straight into the text, without any of the usual introductory background material and proceeds by discussing small blocks of text in six chapters, one for each chapter of the letter. Although the commentary is aimed at pastors, preachers and a general Christian readership, the writing style does not make for easy reading – phrases like ‘missive into ecclesiastical calm’, ‘prudence in divine pedagogy’ and ‘our present yearnings must be transfigured’ are rather typical of the author’s mode of expression. The difficulties of untangling Paul’s long sentences in his letter are perhaps not best served by this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Journal for the Study of the New Testament is one of the leading academic journals in New Testament Studies. It is published five times a year and aims to present cutting-edge work for a readership of scholars, teachers in the field of New Testament, postgraduate students and advanced undergraduates. All the many and diverse aspects of New Testament study are represented and promoted by the journal, including innovative work from historical perspectives, studies using social-scientific and literary theory or developing theological, cultural and contextual approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信