预聚合硫酸钠在糜烂性和非糜烂性胃食管反流病治疗中的作用——高效硫酸钠-粘蛋白屏障的肠细胞保护作用

R. Mccullough
{"title":"预聚合硫酸钠在糜烂性和非糜烂性胃食管反流病治疗中的作用——高效硫酸钠-粘蛋白屏障的肠细胞保护作用","authors":"R. Mccullough","doi":"10.33552/ajgh.2020.02.000531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The superior performance of acid-controlling therapies, namely proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA), eroded the early but tenuous role of sucralfate in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which role had resulted from clinical off-labeled use of sucralfate’s original regulatory indication, wihch was the management of duodenal ulcers. The clinical performance of standard sucralfate dosed at 14mg per kg (1 gram) four times daily was clinically inconsistent, substantially unimpressive and led to its exclusion from most clinical guidelines for GERD [1-4]. Clinical efficacy for standard sucralfate, whether tablet or suspension, had been largely mediocre for both erosive GERD and for NERD, non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. There were two notable exceptions a trial conducted by Simon, et al. [5] in NERD patients using a mucoadherent gel formulation of sucralfate (twice as potent as sucralfate suspension in terms of retention on the mucosal lining of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [6,7]) and a trial conducted by Vermieidien, et al. [8] using sucralfate suspension for eGERD. In the former study [5], a 14mg/ Abstract","PeriodicalId":72038,"journal":{"name":"Academic journal of gastroenterology & hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role for Pre-Polymerized Sucralfate in Management of Erosive and Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease – High Potency Sucralfate-Mucin Barrier for Enteric Cytoprotection\",\"authors\":\"R. Mccullough\",\"doi\":\"10.33552/ajgh.2020.02.000531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The superior performance of acid-controlling therapies, namely proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA), eroded the early but tenuous role of sucralfate in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which role had resulted from clinical off-labeled use of sucralfate’s original regulatory indication, wihch was the management of duodenal ulcers. The clinical performance of standard sucralfate dosed at 14mg per kg (1 gram) four times daily was clinically inconsistent, substantially unimpressive and led to its exclusion from most clinical guidelines for GERD [1-4]. Clinical efficacy for standard sucralfate, whether tablet or suspension, had been largely mediocre for both erosive GERD and for NERD, non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. There were two notable exceptions a trial conducted by Simon, et al. [5] in NERD patients using a mucoadherent gel formulation of sucralfate (twice as potent as sucralfate suspension in terms of retention on the mucosal lining of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [6,7]) and a trial conducted by Vermieidien, et al. [8] using sucralfate suspension for eGERD. In the former study [5], a 14mg/ Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":72038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic journal of gastroenterology & hepatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic journal of gastroenterology & hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33552/ajgh.2020.02.000531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic journal of gastroenterology & hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/ajgh.2020.02.000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

控制酸的疗法,即质子泵抑制剂(PPI)和组胺-2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)的优越性能,侵蚀了硫硫钠在胃食管反流病(GERD)治疗中的早期但微弱的作用,这种作用是由于临床超标签使用硫硫钠的原始调节适应症,即十二指肠溃疡的治疗。每日四次,剂量为14mg / kg(1克)的标准硫糖钠的临床表现在临床上不一致,基本上不令人印象深刻,导致其被排除在大多数胃食管反流临床指南之外[1-4]。对于糜烂性胃食管反流病(NERD)和糜烂性胃食管反流病(non-糜烂性胃食管反流病),无论是片剂还是悬浮液,标准硫糖铝的临床疗效都一般。有两个值得注意的例外,一个是Simon等人在NERD患者中进行的一项试验,该试验使用黏附凝胶配方的硫糖酸盐(在胃肠道粘膜衬里的保留作用是硫糖酸悬浮液的两倍[6,7]),另一个是Vermieidien等人进行的一项试验,使用硫糖酸悬浮液治疗eGERD。在前一项研究中,14mg/ Abstract
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role for Pre-Polymerized Sucralfate in Management of Erosive and Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease – High Potency Sucralfate-Mucin Barrier for Enteric Cytoprotection
The superior performance of acid-controlling therapies, namely proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA), eroded the early but tenuous role of sucralfate in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which role had resulted from clinical off-labeled use of sucralfate’s original regulatory indication, wihch was the management of duodenal ulcers. The clinical performance of standard sucralfate dosed at 14mg per kg (1 gram) four times daily was clinically inconsistent, substantially unimpressive and led to its exclusion from most clinical guidelines for GERD [1-4]. Clinical efficacy for standard sucralfate, whether tablet or suspension, had been largely mediocre for both erosive GERD and for NERD, non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. There were two notable exceptions a trial conducted by Simon, et al. [5] in NERD patients using a mucoadherent gel formulation of sucralfate (twice as potent as sucralfate suspension in terms of retention on the mucosal lining of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [6,7]) and a trial conducted by Vermieidien, et al. [8] using sucralfate suspension for eGERD. In the former study [5], a 14mg/ Abstract
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信