{"title":"用机器学习方法预测钠基膨润土gcl的导电性","authors":"Dong Li, Zhenlong Jiang, Kuo Tian, Ran Ji","doi":"10.1680/jenge.22.00181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Six machine learning methods (Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, SVM, KNN,and ANN) were used to predict/classify hydraulic conductivity of conventional sodium-bentonite geosynthetic clay liners (Na-B GCLs) to saline solutions or leachates. Data were collected from literature and randomly divided into two groups, i.e., 80% of the data were used to train machine learning models and the rest 20% were applied to evaluate model performance. Features, that are known to affect the hydraulic conductivity of Na-B GCLs (e.g., mass per unit area of GCLs, monovalent and divalent cation, ionic strength (I), relative abundance of monovalent and divalent cations (RMD), swell index, and effective stress), were employed to predict/classify hydraulic conductivity of Na-B GCLs. Comparative analyses were conducted with seven Subsets corresponding to the combination of different features and the best model was determined via cross-validation. The results showed that XGBoost consistently had the best performance among all methods over all Subsets of feature for both regression and classification analyses. Subset 4, using swell index, I, RMD, I2·RMD, monovalent cation, divalent cation, effective stress, and mass per unit area as features, outperformed all other six Subsets in both regression analysis (R2=0.826) and classification analysis (Accuracy=0.887) in the out-of-sample tests.","PeriodicalId":11823,"journal":{"name":"Environmental geotechnics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of hydraulic conductivity of sodium bentonite GCLs by machine learning approaches\",\"authors\":\"Dong Li, Zhenlong Jiang, Kuo Tian, Ran Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jenge.22.00181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Six machine learning methods (Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, SVM, KNN,and ANN) were used to predict/classify hydraulic conductivity of conventional sodium-bentonite geosynthetic clay liners (Na-B GCLs) to saline solutions or leachates. Data were collected from literature and randomly divided into two groups, i.e., 80% of the data were used to train machine learning models and the rest 20% were applied to evaluate model performance. Features, that are known to affect the hydraulic conductivity of Na-B GCLs (e.g., mass per unit area of GCLs, monovalent and divalent cation, ionic strength (I), relative abundance of monovalent and divalent cations (RMD), swell index, and effective stress), were employed to predict/classify hydraulic conductivity of Na-B GCLs. Comparative analyses were conducted with seven Subsets corresponding to the combination of different features and the best model was determined via cross-validation. The results showed that XGBoost consistently had the best performance among all methods over all Subsets of feature for both regression and classification analyses. Subset 4, using swell index, I, RMD, I2·RMD, monovalent cation, divalent cation, effective stress, and mass per unit area as features, outperformed all other six Subsets in both regression analysis (R2=0.826) and classification analysis (Accuracy=0.887) in the out-of-sample tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental geotechnics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.22.00181\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.22.00181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction of hydraulic conductivity of sodium bentonite GCLs by machine learning approaches
Six machine learning methods (Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, SVM, KNN,and ANN) were used to predict/classify hydraulic conductivity of conventional sodium-bentonite geosynthetic clay liners (Na-B GCLs) to saline solutions or leachates. Data were collected from literature and randomly divided into two groups, i.e., 80% of the data were used to train machine learning models and the rest 20% were applied to evaluate model performance. Features, that are known to affect the hydraulic conductivity of Na-B GCLs (e.g., mass per unit area of GCLs, monovalent and divalent cation, ionic strength (I), relative abundance of monovalent and divalent cations (RMD), swell index, and effective stress), were employed to predict/classify hydraulic conductivity of Na-B GCLs. Comparative analyses were conducted with seven Subsets corresponding to the combination of different features and the best model was determined via cross-validation. The results showed that XGBoost consistently had the best performance among all methods over all Subsets of feature for both regression and classification analyses. Subset 4, using swell index, I, RMD, I2·RMD, monovalent cation, divalent cation, effective stress, and mass per unit area as features, outperformed all other six Subsets in both regression analysis (R2=0.826) and classification analysis (Accuracy=0.887) in the out-of-sample tests.
期刊介绍:
In 21st century living, engineers and researchers need to deal with growing problems related to climate change, oil and water storage, handling, storage and disposal of toxic and hazardous wastes, remediation of contaminated sites, sustainable development and energy derived from the ground.
Environmental Geotechnics aims to disseminate knowledge and provides a fresh perspective regarding the basic concepts, theory, techniques and field applicability of innovative testing and analysis methodologies and engineering practices in geoenvironmental engineering.
The journal''s Editor in Chief is a Member of the Committee on Publication Ethics.
All relevant papers are carefully considered, vetted by a distinguished team of international experts and rapidly published. Full research papers, short communications and comprehensive review articles are published under the following broad subject categories:
geochemistry and geohydrology,
soil and rock physics, biological processes in soil, soil-atmosphere interaction,
electrical, electromagnetic and thermal characteristics of porous media,
waste management, utilization of wastes, multiphase science, landslide wasting,
soil and water conservation,
sensor development and applications,
the impact of climatic changes on geoenvironmental, geothermal/ground-source energy, carbon sequestration, oil and gas extraction techniques,
uncertainty, reliability and risk, monitoring and forensic geotechnics.