澳大利亚东南部遗产尺寸石材修复用粘合剂拉伸性能的表征

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
B. Jones, B. Sainsbury
{"title":"澳大利亚东南部遗产尺寸石材修复用粘合剂拉伸性能的表征","authors":"B. Jones, B. Sainsbury","doi":"10.1080/08120099.2023.2213297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Through this research, we measure the direct tensile strength of three important southeast Australian heritage dimension stones and compare the results with published values. The three stones are Sydney Sandstone, Victorian Bluestone and South Australian Black Granite. This information is crucial for stone masons when they are selecting and cutting stone for construction projects, as they need to ensure that the stone they use and the repair will be strong enough to withstand the loads and stresses it will be subjected to in its final location. Results show that direct methods of testing provide tensile strengths that are 30–63% of the indirect methods. When the direct tension to compressive strength ratio is considered, results of 2–7% are calculated for these stones. This is significantly less than the typically assumed 10% for intact rock. Three masonry bonding agents have been selected to determine their capacity to re-bond the dimension stone. Highly variable results were achieved, with re-bonded tensile strengths ranging from 6% to 104% of the intact strength. This variability is most likely related to the heterogeneity of the stones and the surface preparations. Based on these outcomes, it is recommended that stone masons carefully consider the product that is used for restoration works and that test samples be prepared to confirm capacities. KEY POINTS Direct tension testing has been completed on Sydney Sandstone, Victorian Bluestone and South Australian Black Granite dimension stones. Direct tension results have not been previously published for these stones. Direct methods of testing provide tensile strengths that are 30–63% of the indirect methods on these stone types. When the direct tension to unconfined compressive strength ratio is considered, results of 2–7% are returned for these stones. This is significantly less than the typically assumed 10%. The performance of bonding agents on each of the stones provides variable results suggesting that careful selection of products is required and, if possible, test samples be prepared to confirm bond capacities.","PeriodicalId":8601,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Earth Sciences","volume":"70 1","pages":"731 - 740"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterisation of the tensile performance of bonding agents for the restoration of heritage dimension stone from southeast Australia\",\"authors\":\"B. Jones, B. Sainsbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08120099.2023.2213297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Through this research, we measure the direct tensile strength of three important southeast Australian heritage dimension stones and compare the results with published values. The three stones are Sydney Sandstone, Victorian Bluestone and South Australian Black Granite. This information is crucial for stone masons when they are selecting and cutting stone for construction projects, as they need to ensure that the stone they use and the repair will be strong enough to withstand the loads and stresses it will be subjected to in its final location. Results show that direct methods of testing provide tensile strengths that are 30–63% of the indirect methods. When the direct tension to compressive strength ratio is considered, results of 2–7% are calculated for these stones. This is significantly less than the typically assumed 10% for intact rock. Three masonry bonding agents have been selected to determine their capacity to re-bond the dimension stone. Highly variable results were achieved, with re-bonded tensile strengths ranging from 6% to 104% of the intact strength. This variability is most likely related to the heterogeneity of the stones and the surface preparations. Based on these outcomes, it is recommended that stone masons carefully consider the product that is used for restoration works and that test samples be prepared to confirm capacities. KEY POINTS Direct tension testing has been completed on Sydney Sandstone, Victorian Bluestone and South Australian Black Granite dimension stones. Direct tension results have not been previously published for these stones. Direct methods of testing provide tensile strengths that are 30–63% of the indirect methods on these stone types. When the direct tension to unconfined compressive strength ratio is considered, results of 2–7% are returned for these stones. This is significantly less than the typically assumed 10%. The performance of bonding agents on each of the stones provides variable results suggesting that careful selection of products is required and, if possible, test samples be prepared to confirm bond capacities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"731 - 740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2023.2213297\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2023.2213297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要通过本研究,我们测量了三种重要的澳大利亚东南部遗产尺寸石头的直接抗拉强度,并将结果与已发表的值进行了比较。这三块石头分别是悉尼砂岩、维多利亚蓝石和南澳大利亚黑花岗岩。这些信息对于石匠在为建筑项目选择和切割石头时至关重要,因为他们需要确保他们使用的石头和修复材料足够坚固,能够承受其最终位置所承受的载荷和应力。结果表明,直接测试方法的抗拉强度为间接测试方法的30-63%。当考虑直接抗拉抗压强度比时,这些石头的计算结果为2-7%。这明显低于通常假设的完整岩石的10%。已经选择了三种砖石粘合剂来确定它们重新粘合尺寸石头的能力。获得了高度可变的结果,重新结合的拉伸强度为完整强度的6%至104%。这种可变性很可能与石头和表面处理的异质性有关。基于这些结果,建议石匠仔细考虑用于修复工程的产品,并准备测试样本以确认其能力。关键点悉尼砂岩、维多利亚蓝石和南澳大利亚黑花岗岩尺寸石已完成直接张力测试。这些石头的直接张力结果此前尚未公布。直接测试方法提供的抗拉强度是这些石材类型间接测试方法的30-63%。当考虑直接张力与无侧限抗压强度的比值时,这些石头的结果为2-7%。这明显低于通常假设的10%。每一块石头上的粘合剂的性能提供了不同的结果,这表明需要仔细选择产品,如果可能的话,准备测试样品以确认粘合能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterisation of the tensile performance of bonding agents for the restoration of heritage dimension stone from southeast Australia
Abstract Through this research, we measure the direct tensile strength of three important southeast Australian heritage dimension stones and compare the results with published values. The three stones are Sydney Sandstone, Victorian Bluestone and South Australian Black Granite. This information is crucial for stone masons when they are selecting and cutting stone for construction projects, as they need to ensure that the stone they use and the repair will be strong enough to withstand the loads and stresses it will be subjected to in its final location. Results show that direct methods of testing provide tensile strengths that are 30–63% of the indirect methods. When the direct tension to compressive strength ratio is considered, results of 2–7% are calculated for these stones. This is significantly less than the typically assumed 10% for intact rock. Three masonry bonding agents have been selected to determine their capacity to re-bond the dimension stone. Highly variable results were achieved, with re-bonded tensile strengths ranging from 6% to 104% of the intact strength. This variability is most likely related to the heterogeneity of the stones and the surface preparations. Based on these outcomes, it is recommended that stone masons carefully consider the product that is used for restoration works and that test samples be prepared to confirm capacities. KEY POINTS Direct tension testing has been completed on Sydney Sandstone, Victorian Bluestone and South Australian Black Granite dimension stones. Direct tension results have not been previously published for these stones. Direct methods of testing provide tensile strengths that are 30–63% of the indirect methods on these stone types. When the direct tension to unconfined compressive strength ratio is considered, results of 2–7% are returned for these stones. This is significantly less than the typically assumed 10%. The performance of bonding agents on each of the stones provides variable results suggesting that careful selection of products is required and, if possible, test samples be prepared to confirm bond capacities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences publishes peer-reviewed research papers as well as significant review articles of general interest to geoscientists. The Journal covers the whole field of earth science including basin studies, regional geophysical studies and metallogeny. There is usually a thematic issue each year featuring a selection of papers on a particular area of earth science. Shorter papers are encouraged and are given priority in publication. Critical discussion of recently published papers is also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信