居民确定了在大都市小县城实施基于项目的永久性支持性住房计划的优势和挑战

Q2 Social Sciences
Peter Miterko, S. Bruna
{"title":"居民确定了在大都市小县城实施基于项目的永久性支持性住房计划的优势和挑战","authors":"Peter Miterko, S. Bruna","doi":"10.1080/08882746.2020.1818049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Abstract: Permanent supportive housing (PSH) programs modeled in the Housing First approach have been widely implemented in the United States for housing individuals who have experienced chronic homelessness. Yet within the evidence base, resident experiences and perceptions of Project-Based PSH program implementation are less understood, and there is no research on resident experiences of project-based program implementation within small metropolitan communities in the United States. Utilizing a collaborative approach founded in the principles of participatory action research (PAR) to orientate research processes, we critically examine resident-identified strengths and challenges of living at St. Mary’s House, a Project-Based PSH program in Whatcom County, Washington. Data analysis of participant observation and semi-structured interviews explore the positive and negative dimensions of program surveillance measures and living together in PSH, as well as how program “exits” undermine residents’ expectations of permanency. The implications from our findings highlight the importance of both listening directly to residents, and developing resident-driven programming expressly designed for meaningful and inclusive participation.","PeriodicalId":52110,"journal":{"name":"Housing and Society","volume":"48 1","pages":"239 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08882746.2020.1818049","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resident identified strengths and challenges of project-based permanent supportive housing program implementation in a small metropolitan county\",\"authors\":\"Peter Miterko, S. Bruna\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08882746.2020.1818049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Abstract: Permanent supportive housing (PSH) programs modeled in the Housing First approach have been widely implemented in the United States for housing individuals who have experienced chronic homelessness. Yet within the evidence base, resident experiences and perceptions of Project-Based PSH program implementation are less understood, and there is no research on resident experiences of project-based program implementation within small metropolitan communities in the United States. Utilizing a collaborative approach founded in the principles of participatory action research (PAR) to orientate research processes, we critically examine resident-identified strengths and challenges of living at St. Mary’s House, a Project-Based PSH program in Whatcom County, Washington. Data analysis of participant observation and semi-structured interviews explore the positive and negative dimensions of program surveillance measures and living together in PSH, as well as how program “exits” undermine residents’ expectations of permanency. The implications from our findings highlight the importance of both listening directly to residents, and developing resident-driven programming expressly designed for meaningful and inclusive participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing and Society\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"239 - 260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08882746.2020.1818049\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2020.1818049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2020.1818049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要摘要:以住房优先为模式的永久性支持性住房(PSH)计划已在美国广泛实施,为长期无家可归的个人提供住房。然而,在证据库中,居民对基于项目的PSH项目实施的经验和看法了解较少,也没有对美国小城市社区内居民对基于计划的项目实施的体验进行研究。利用建立在参与性行动研究(标准杆数)原则基础上的合作方法来确定研究过程的方向,我们批判性地检查了居住在圣玛丽之家的居民识别的优势和挑战,这是华盛顿Whatcom县一个基于项目的PSH项目。参与者观察和半结构化访谈的数据分析探讨了项目监督措施和在PSH共同生活的积极和消极方面,以及项目“退出”如何破坏居民对永久性的期望。我们的研究结果突出了直接倾听居民意见和制定专门为有意义和包容性的参与而设计的居民驱动的节目的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resident identified strengths and challenges of project-based permanent supportive housing program implementation in a small metropolitan county
ABSTRACT Abstract: Permanent supportive housing (PSH) programs modeled in the Housing First approach have been widely implemented in the United States for housing individuals who have experienced chronic homelessness. Yet within the evidence base, resident experiences and perceptions of Project-Based PSH program implementation are less understood, and there is no research on resident experiences of project-based program implementation within small metropolitan communities in the United States. Utilizing a collaborative approach founded in the principles of participatory action research (PAR) to orientate research processes, we critically examine resident-identified strengths and challenges of living at St. Mary’s House, a Project-Based PSH program in Whatcom County, Washington. Data analysis of participant observation and semi-structured interviews explore the positive and negative dimensions of program surveillance measures and living together in PSH, as well as how program “exits” undermine residents’ expectations of permanency. The implications from our findings highlight the importance of both listening directly to residents, and developing resident-driven programming expressly designed for meaningful and inclusive participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing and Society
Housing and Society Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Housing and Society is the journal of the Housing Education and Research Association (HERA). The journal supports the mission of HERA by providing for the dissemination of research and other scholarly work. Submissions from a broad range of perspectives are encouraged. Topics in housing include: policy, design, social aspects, gerontology, behavioral aspects, energy/environment, equipment, interiors, economics, theory/model development, education, and program development or evaluation. The journal welcomes the submission of original research articles, notes and commentaries. Notes are shorter manuscripts presenting succinct information on housing related to one of the following categories: - Research: exploratory or not heavily theory-based or statistically analyzed - Academic: innovative teaching ideas - Program: development, implementation, and/or evaluation of Cooperative Extension or other housing programming efforts - Policy: examination of policy impact, comparative analysis, and/or need to achieve housing goals - Reviews: books, documentaries, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信