{"title":"一些来自德国和法国的渐新世石鳖(软体动物纲:Polylacophora)","authors":"B. Dell’Angelo, M. Sosso, A. Kroh","doi":"10.3140/bull.geosci.1744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"placophorans did not receive much attention from the academic community. The early authors sometimes mentioned any chiton valves at the end of their mono graphs on bivalve and gastropod faunas (e.g., Sand berger 1858–1863; Reuss 1860; Cossmann 1888; Boettger 1902, 1906–1907; Cossmann & Peyrot 1909–1935; Zilch 1934). Before the 1950s very few papers focused specifically on fossil polyplacophorans. A notable exception is the work of Šulc (1934), which has remained an indispensable reference for any later study on chitons from the Cenozoic of Europe. The large majority of European chiton records are from Neogene, while chitons from the Paleogene are poorly known, with greater prevalence of records from Eocene (Cossmann 1888, 1922; Cossmann & Pissarro 1900, 1905; Wrigley 1943; Bielokrys 1999, 2000; Dell’Angelo et al. 2011, 2015a; Cherns & Schwabe 2017). Oligocene records even are less prevalent, limited to Germany (Sand berger 1858–1863; Koenen 1892; Janssen 1978; Gürs 1992, 1995; Müller 2011), Belgium (Marquet et al. 2008), France (Rolle 1862, Cossmann & Peyrot 1909– 1935, Vergneau 1966, Dell’Angelo et al. 2018a), Italy (Dell’Angelo & Palazzi 1992, Dell’Angelo et al. 2015c). The recently discovery of the type material of four chiton species from the Oligocene of Germany and France preserved in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Šulc collection) is of great importance, and permits a better knowledge of these poorly known species. We provide for the first time SEM-images of these species, and translations of the original descriptions.","PeriodicalId":9332,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Geosciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"299-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Oligocene chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) from Germany and France\",\"authors\":\"B. Dell’Angelo, M. Sosso, A. Kroh\",\"doi\":\"10.3140/bull.geosci.1744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"placophorans did not receive much attention from the academic community. The early authors sometimes mentioned any chiton valves at the end of their mono graphs on bivalve and gastropod faunas (e.g., Sand berger 1858–1863; Reuss 1860; Cossmann 1888; Boettger 1902, 1906–1907; Cossmann & Peyrot 1909–1935; Zilch 1934). Before the 1950s very few papers focused specifically on fossil polyplacophorans. A notable exception is the work of Šulc (1934), which has remained an indispensable reference for any later study on chitons from the Cenozoic of Europe. The large majority of European chiton records are from Neogene, while chitons from the Paleogene are poorly known, with greater prevalence of records from Eocene (Cossmann 1888, 1922; Cossmann & Pissarro 1900, 1905; Wrigley 1943; Bielokrys 1999, 2000; Dell’Angelo et al. 2011, 2015a; Cherns & Schwabe 2017). Oligocene records even are less prevalent, limited to Germany (Sand berger 1858–1863; Koenen 1892; Janssen 1978; Gürs 1992, 1995; Müller 2011), Belgium (Marquet et al. 2008), France (Rolle 1862, Cossmann & Peyrot 1909– 1935, Vergneau 1966, Dell’Angelo et al. 2018a), Italy (Dell’Angelo & Palazzi 1992, Dell’Angelo et al. 2015c). The recently discovery of the type material of four chiton species from the Oligocene of Germany and France preserved in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Šulc collection) is of great importance, and permits a better knowledge of these poorly known species. We provide for the first time SEM-images of these species, and translations of the original descriptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"299-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.1744\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.1744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
placophorans并没有受到学术界的广泛关注。早期的作者有时会在双壳类和腹足类动物群的单行本末尾提到任何壳阀(例如,Sand berger 1858-1863;Reuss 1860;Cossmann 1888;Boettger 19021906–1907;Cossmann&Peyrot 1909-1935;Zilch 1934)。在20世纪50年代之前,很少有论文专门关注聚冰藻化石。一个值得注意的例外是Šulc(1934)的工作,它仍然是后来研究欧洲新生代石鳖不可或缺的参考。大多数欧洲石鳖记录来自新第三纪,而古第三纪的石鳖鲜为人知,始新世的记录更为普遍(Cossmann 18881922;Cossmann和Pissarro 19001905;Wrigley 1943;Bielokrys 19992000;Dell'Angelo等人20112015a;Cherns和Schwabe 2017)。渐新世的记录甚至不那么普遍,仅限于德国(Sandberger 1858–1863;Koeen 1892;Janssen 1978;Gürs 19921995;Müller 2011)、比利时(Marquet et al.2008)、法国(Rolle 1862,Cossmann&Peyrot 1909-1935,Vergneau 1966,Dell'Angelo et al.2018a)、意大利(Dell'Angelo&Palazzi 1992,Dell'Aangelo et al.2015c)。维也纳自然历史博物馆(Šulc收藏)最近发现了四种德国和法国渐新世石鳖的模式材料,这一发现具有重要意义,可以更好地了解这些鲜为人知的物种。我们首次提供了这些物种的SEM图像,以及原始描述的翻译。
Some Oligocene chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) from Germany and France
placophorans did not receive much attention from the academic community. The early authors sometimes mentioned any chiton valves at the end of their mono graphs on bivalve and gastropod faunas (e.g., Sand berger 1858–1863; Reuss 1860; Cossmann 1888; Boettger 1902, 1906–1907; Cossmann & Peyrot 1909–1935; Zilch 1934). Before the 1950s very few papers focused specifically on fossil polyplacophorans. A notable exception is the work of Šulc (1934), which has remained an indispensable reference for any later study on chitons from the Cenozoic of Europe. The large majority of European chiton records are from Neogene, while chitons from the Paleogene are poorly known, with greater prevalence of records from Eocene (Cossmann 1888, 1922; Cossmann & Pissarro 1900, 1905; Wrigley 1943; Bielokrys 1999, 2000; Dell’Angelo et al. 2011, 2015a; Cherns & Schwabe 2017). Oligocene records even are less prevalent, limited to Germany (Sand berger 1858–1863; Koenen 1892; Janssen 1978; Gürs 1992, 1995; Müller 2011), Belgium (Marquet et al. 2008), France (Rolle 1862, Cossmann & Peyrot 1909– 1935, Vergneau 1966, Dell’Angelo et al. 2018a), Italy (Dell’Angelo & Palazzi 1992, Dell’Angelo et al. 2015c). The recently discovery of the type material of four chiton species from the Oligocene of Germany and France preserved in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Šulc collection) is of great importance, and permits a better knowledge of these poorly known species. We provide for the first time SEM-images of these species, and translations of the original descriptions.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of Geosciences is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles, and short contributions concerning palaeoenvironmental geology, including palaeontology, stratigraphy, sedimentology, palaeogeography, palaeoecology, palaeoclimatology, geochemistry, mineralogy, geophysics, and related fields. All papers are subject to international peer review, and acceptance is based on quality alone.