{"title":"内部癌症:罗马尼亚的生殖、文化转型和保健","authors":"P. Sledge","doi":"10.1177/00943061231191421dd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In The Cancer Within: Reproduction, Cultural Transformation, and Health Care in Romania, Cristina A. Pop untangles the relationship between pronatalism, patriarchy, lived religion, state medical policies, morality, and women’s reproductive choices from abortion to the HPV vaccine in contemporary Romania. Pop’s ethnographic analysis of the Delcel neighborhood of Ros xiori de Vede in Romania offers a deep engagement with the complicated structural and interpersonal factors that shape women’s access to reproductive health care and the ways they understand the choices they have, the constraints on those choices, and how those choices link together both their histories of medical engagement and the futures they wish for themselves and future generations. Pop carefully considers how the context of reproductive choice and medical intervention is not unique to this neighborhood in Romania. Rather, The Cancer Within offers a framework to consider the broad and shifting structural factors that shape how patients and doctors interact, how parents and grandparents advise their children and grandchildren, and how power dynamics relating to gender complicate the deceptively simple logic that individuals will make choices based on medically accepted notions of good health. Pop, a Romanian herself, conducted fieldwork in Delcel from 2005 to 2013. In addition to interviews with women in the neighborhood, Pop conducted surveys with Romanian men (who were reticent to participate in interviews) and recounts her own experiences receiving reproductive health care and giving birth in Romania. Pop writes, ‘‘The people who populate The Cancer Within are children born to fulfill a destiny that an official state decree had already planned on their behalf’’ (p. 16). The pronatalist policies of the Romanian government shape medical care, patient choice, and the reproductive futures of any person able to give birth in Romania. Pop’s inclusion of her own experiences adds a layer of understanding to her analysis and allows the reader to experience medical care along with her. In this way, Pop’s own experience creates a bridge between the presumed world view of an educated reader with the lived experience of a community that, during the field work period, did not have a sewage system or access to running water (p. 15). Such details might shape how a reader approaches the stories Pop includes from Romanian women. By bringing together ethnography, surveys, and her own experience, Pop encourages readers to share in the full complexity of reproductive decision-making and to turn that same analytic lens to reproductive conditions in other places. The Cancer Within sets out to understand the disproportionately high rates of cervical cancer and mortality in Romania while those rates were declining in other parts of Europe (p. 1). Engaging first with epidemiological approaches to understanding these drastically high cancer rates, Pop contends that ‘‘we lack a nuanced and historically articulated picture of the reasons that single out Romania’’ (p. 4). In filling this gap, Pop argues that cervical cancer in Romania is a result of ‘‘systemic contingencies’’ in which diseases and social conditions produce inescapable forces on women’s reproductive choices. While the analysis is distinctive to the Romanian case, the consideration of 470 Reviews","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"470 - 472"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cancer Within: Reproduction, Cultural Transformation, and Health Care in Romania\",\"authors\":\"P. Sledge\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00943061231191421dd\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In The Cancer Within: Reproduction, Cultural Transformation, and Health Care in Romania, Cristina A. Pop untangles the relationship between pronatalism, patriarchy, lived religion, state medical policies, morality, and women’s reproductive choices from abortion to the HPV vaccine in contemporary Romania. Pop’s ethnographic analysis of the Delcel neighborhood of Ros xiori de Vede in Romania offers a deep engagement with the complicated structural and interpersonal factors that shape women’s access to reproductive health care and the ways they understand the choices they have, the constraints on those choices, and how those choices link together both their histories of medical engagement and the futures they wish for themselves and future generations. Pop carefully considers how the context of reproductive choice and medical intervention is not unique to this neighborhood in Romania. Rather, The Cancer Within offers a framework to consider the broad and shifting structural factors that shape how patients and doctors interact, how parents and grandparents advise their children and grandchildren, and how power dynamics relating to gender complicate the deceptively simple logic that individuals will make choices based on medically accepted notions of good health. Pop, a Romanian herself, conducted fieldwork in Delcel from 2005 to 2013. In addition to interviews with women in the neighborhood, Pop conducted surveys with Romanian men (who were reticent to participate in interviews) and recounts her own experiences receiving reproductive health care and giving birth in Romania. Pop writes, ‘‘The people who populate The Cancer Within are children born to fulfill a destiny that an official state decree had already planned on their behalf’’ (p. 16). The pronatalist policies of the Romanian government shape medical care, patient choice, and the reproductive futures of any person able to give birth in Romania. Pop’s inclusion of her own experiences adds a layer of understanding to her analysis and allows the reader to experience medical care along with her. In this way, Pop’s own experience creates a bridge between the presumed world view of an educated reader with the lived experience of a community that, during the field work period, did not have a sewage system or access to running water (p. 15). Such details might shape how a reader approaches the stories Pop includes from Romanian women. By bringing together ethnography, surveys, and her own experience, Pop encourages readers to share in the full complexity of reproductive decision-making and to turn that same analytic lens to reproductive conditions in other places. The Cancer Within sets out to understand the disproportionately high rates of cervical cancer and mortality in Romania while those rates were declining in other parts of Europe (p. 1). Engaging first with epidemiological approaches to understanding these drastically high cancer rates, Pop contends that ‘‘we lack a nuanced and historically articulated picture of the reasons that single out Romania’’ (p. 4). In filling this gap, Pop argues that cervical cancer in Romania is a result of ‘‘systemic contingencies’’ in which diseases and social conditions produce inescapable forces on women’s reproductive choices. While the analysis is distinctive to the Romanian case, the consideration of 470 Reviews\",\"PeriodicalId\":46889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"470 - 472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231191421dd\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231191421dd","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在《内在的癌症:罗马尼亚的生殖、文化转型和医疗保健》一书中,克里斯蒂娜·a·波普(Cristina A. Pop)梳理了当代罗马尼亚的亲生主义、父权制、生活宗教、国家医疗政策、道德以及妇女从堕胎到HPV疫苗的生殖选择之间的关系。Pop对罗马尼亚Ros xiori de Vede的Delcel社区进行的人种学分析,深入探讨了影响妇女获得生殖保健的复杂结构和人际因素,以及她们对自己所做选择的理解方式,对这些选择的限制,以及这些选择如何将她们参与医疗的历史和她们对自己和后代的希望的未来联系起来。Pop仔细考虑了生殖选择和医疗干预的背景如何不是罗马尼亚这个社区所独有的。相反,《内在的癌症》一书提供了一个框架,让我们思考那些广泛而不断变化的结构性因素,这些因素塑造了病人和医生之间的互动方式,父母和祖父母如何建议他们的子女和孙辈,以及与性别相关的权力动态如何使个人会根据医学上公认的健康观念做出选择这一看似简单的逻辑变得复杂。Pop本人也是罗马尼亚人,她从2005年到2013年在德尔塞尔进行了实地调查。除了对附近的妇女进行采访外,Pop还对罗马尼亚男性进行了调查(他们不愿参与采访),并讲述了她自己在罗马尼亚接受生殖保健和分娩的经历。Pop写道:“《内心的癌症》里的人是一群孩子,他们生来就是为了完成一项官方法令已经为他们计划好的命运”(第16页)。罗马尼亚政府的生育政策影响着医疗保健、病人的选择以及任何能够在罗马尼亚生育的人的生育未来。Pop将自己的经历融入其中,为她的分析增添了一层理解,并让读者与她一起体验医疗护理。通过这种方式,波普自己的经历在一个受过教育的读者的假定世界观与一个社区的生活经验之间架起了一座桥梁,在实地工作期间,这个社区没有污水处理系统或自来水(第15页)。这些细节可能会影响读者对Pop收录的罗马尼亚女性故事的看法。通过将民族志、调查和她自己的经历结合起来,Pop鼓励读者分享生殖决策的全部复杂性,并将同样的分析镜头转向其他地方的生殖状况。《癌症内部》一书旨在了解罗马尼亚的宫颈癌和死亡率高得不成比例,而欧洲其他地区的宫颈癌和死亡率却在下降(第1页)。波普首先用流行病学方法来理解这些极高的癌症发病率,他认为,“我们缺乏一种细致入微的、历史清晰的方式来说明罗马尼亚的原因”(第4页)。Pop认为,罗马尼亚的宫颈癌是“系统性突发事件”的结果,其中疾病和社会条件对妇女的生育选择产生了不可避免的影响。虽然对罗马尼亚情况的分析是独特的,但对470次审查的审议
The Cancer Within: Reproduction, Cultural Transformation, and Health Care in Romania
In The Cancer Within: Reproduction, Cultural Transformation, and Health Care in Romania, Cristina A. Pop untangles the relationship between pronatalism, patriarchy, lived religion, state medical policies, morality, and women’s reproductive choices from abortion to the HPV vaccine in contemporary Romania. Pop’s ethnographic analysis of the Delcel neighborhood of Ros xiori de Vede in Romania offers a deep engagement with the complicated structural and interpersonal factors that shape women’s access to reproductive health care and the ways they understand the choices they have, the constraints on those choices, and how those choices link together both their histories of medical engagement and the futures they wish for themselves and future generations. Pop carefully considers how the context of reproductive choice and medical intervention is not unique to this neighborhood in Romania. Rather, The Cancer Within offers a framework to consider the broad and shifting structural factors that shape how patients and doctors interact, how parents and grandparents advise their children and grandchildren, and how power dynamics relating to gender complicate the deceptively simple logic that individuals will make choices based on medically accepted notions of good health. Pop, a Romanian herself, conducted fieldwork in Delcel from 2005 to 2013. In addition to interviews with women in the neighborhood, Pop conducted surveys with Romanian men (who were reticent to participate in interviews) and recounts her own experiences receiving reproductive health care and giving birth in Romania. Pop writes, ‘‘The people who populate The Cancer Within are children born to fulfill a destiny that an official state decree had already planned on their behalf’’ (p. 16). The pronatalist policies of the Romanian government shape medical care, patient choice, and the reproductive futures of any person able to give birth in Romania. Pop’s inclusion of her own experiences adds a layer of understanding to her analysis and allows the reader to experience medical care along with her. In this way, Pop’s own experience creates a bridge between the presumed world view of an educated reader with the lived experience of a community that, during the field work period, did not have a sewage system or access to running water (p. 15). Such details might shape how a reader approaches the stories Pop includes from Romanian women. By bringing together ethnography, surveys, and her own experience, Pop encourages readers to share in the full complexity of reproductive decision-making and to turn that same analytic lens to reproductive conditions in other places. The Cancer Within sets out to understand the disproportionately high rates of cervical cancer and mortality in Romania while those rates were declining in other parts of Europe (p. 1). Engaging first with epidemiological approaches to understanding these drastically high cancer rates, Pop contends that ‘‘we lack a nuanced and historically articulated picture of the reasons that single out Romania’’ (p. 4). In filling this gap, Pop argues that cervical cancer in Romania is a result of ‘‘systemic contingencies’’ in which diseases and social conditions produce inescapable forces on women’s reproductive choices. While the analysis is distinctive to the Romanian case, the consideration of 470 Reviews