中国对非直接投资的现代趋势:一种OLI方法

H. Bezuidenhout, E. Kleynhans
{"title":"中国对非直接投资的现代趋势:一种OLI方法","authors":"H. Bezuidenhout, E. Kleynhans","doi":"10.26493/1854-6935.16.279-300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the subtle differences that the various types of foreign direct investment (FDI) of China in Africa offers, as revealed by the data, using the ‘Ownership, Location and Internalisation Advantages’ OLI approach. Chinese FDI is analysed using source country comparisons, sectoral comparisons and an investigation of Chinese fdi practices. Data visualisation techniques and analyses infer similarities and differences between Chinese and other investors in Africa. These alternativ emethods are driven by the nature of the available data and its resulting statistical possibilities. The significance of this study is that it disambiguates the available data and compares along theory. Many stylised facts are assumed concerning Chinese FDI; this study, however, quantifies and tests these assumptions. The results show that China follows investment patterns of other investors, although heavily skewed towards oil, coal and gas, and other resource sectors. China otherwise tends to invest in medium growth, diversified economies, predominantly Nigeria and Egypt; except in Ethiopia where investment in communications dominates;Cameroon where chemicals dominate; Angola where investments in real estate outperform investment in the coal, oil and gas; and in South Africa and Tanzania that have a more even spread between sectors compared to the rest of the continent.","PeriodicalId":30026,"journal":{"name":"Managing Global Transitions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Trends in Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: An OLI Approach\",\"authors\":\"H. Bezuidenhout, E. Kleynhans\",\"doi\":\"10.26493/1854-6935.16.279-300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study evaluates the subtle differences that the various types of foreign direct investment (FDI) of China in Africa offers, as revealed by the data, using the ‘Ownership, Location and Internalisation Advantages’ OLI approach. Chinese FDI is analysed using source country comparisons, sectoral comparisons and an investigation of Chinese fdi practices. Data visualisation techniques and analyses infer similarities and differences between Chinese and other investors in Africa. These alternativ emethods are driven by the nature of the available data and its resulting statistical possibilities. The significance of this study is that it disambiguates the available data and compares along theory. Many stylised facts are assumed concerning Chinese FDI; this study, however, quantifies and tests these assumptions. The results show that China follows investment patterns of other investors, although heavily skewed towards oil, coal and gas, and other resource sectors. China otherwise tends to invest in medium growth, diversified economies, predominantly Nigeria and Egypt; except in Ethiopia where investment in communications dominates;Cameroon where chemicals dominate; Angola where investments in real estate outperform investment in the coal, oil and gas; and in South Africa and Tanzania that have a more even spread between sectors compared to the rest of the continent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managing Global Transitions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managing Global Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.16.279-300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Global Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.16.279-300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究使用“所有权、区位和国际化优势”OLI方法评估了数据所揭示的中国在非洲的各种类型外国直接投资(FDI)所提供的细微差异。通过来源国比较、部门比较和对中国外商直接投资实践的调查,对中国的外商直接投资进行了分析。数据可视化技术和分析推断出中国和其他非洲投资者之间的异同。这些替代方法是由可用数据的性质及其产生的统计可能性驱动的。本研究的意义在于,它消除了现有数据的歧义,并与理论进行了比较。关于中国的外国直接投资有许多风格化的事实;然而,这项研究量化并检验了这些假设。研究结果表明,中国遵循其他投资者的投资模式,尽管严重偏向石油、煤炭和天然气以及其他资源部门。除此之外,中国倾向于投资中等增长、多元化的经济体,主要是尼日利亚和埃及;埃塞俄比亚除外,那里的通信投资占主导地位;化学品占主导地位的喀麦隆;安哥拉的房地产投资优于煤炭、石油和天然气投资;与非洲大陆其他地区相比,南非和坦桑尼亚的部门间分布更加均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern Trends in Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: An OLI Approach
This study evaluates the subtle differences that the various types of foreign direct investment (FDI) of China in Africa offers, as revealed by the data, using the ‘Ownership, Location and Internalisation Advantages’ OLI approach. Chinese FDI is analysed using source country comparisons, sectoral comparisons and an investigation of Chinese fdi practices. Data visualisation techniques and analyses infer similarities and differences between Chinese and other investors in Africa. These alternativ emethods are driven by the nature of the available data and its resulting statistical possibilities. The significance of this study is that it disambiguates the available data and compares along theory. Many stylised facts are assumed concerning Chinese FDI; this study, however, quantifies and tests these assumptions. The results show that China follows investment patterns of other investors, although heavily skewed towards oil, coal and gas, and other resource sectors. China otherwise tends to invest in medium growth, diversified economies, predominantly Nigeria and Egypt; except in Ethiopia where investment in communications dominates;Cameroon where chemicals dominate; Angola where investments in real estate outperform investment in the coal, oil and gas; and in South Africa and Tanzania that have a more even spread between sectors compared to the rest of the continent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信