Lusotopie Lusotopy。什么是遗产,什么是未来?

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Cahen, Irène Dos Santos
{"title":"Lusotopie Lusotopy。什么是遗产,什么是未来?","authors":"M. Cahen, Irène Dos Santos","doi":"10.1163/17683084-12341718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of this issue goes back over the history of the creation of the Lusotopie journal. It also questions the scope of the concept of lusotopy in the social sciences. The intellectual project of the journal, published from 1994 onwards, was complex and ambitious. Lusotopie is not a review of “cultural-area” studies, but a generalist review of political analysis, in the broadest sense, from an empirically-delimited research field: that of the area drawn by Portuguese history and colonization. It was both to escape the contemporary neo-imperial approach of “Lusophony” and to overcome the simply negative criticism of the ideology of Lusophony (in its literary, political and economic aspects), which as such does not provide a tool for understanding the realities produced by history.","PeriodicalId":42981,"journal":{"name":"Lusotopie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/17683084-12341718","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lusotopie, Lusotopy. What Legacy, What Future?\",\"authors\":\"M. Cahen, Irène Dos Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/17683084-12341718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The introduction of this issue goes back over the history of the creation of the Lusotopie journal. It also questions the scope of the concept of lusotopy in the social sciences. The intellectual project of the journal, published from 1994 onwards, was complex and ambitious. Lusotopie is not a review of “cultural-area” studies, but a generalist review of political analysis, in the broadest sense, from an empirically-delimited research field: that of the area drawn by Portuguese history and colonization. It was both to escape the contemporary neo-imperial approach of “Lusophony” and to overcome the simply negative criticism of the ideology of Lusophony (in its literary, political and economic aspects), which as such does not provide a tool for understanding the realities produced by history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lusotopie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/17683084-12341718\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lusotopie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/17683084-12341718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lusotopie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17683084-12341718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本期的介绍可以追溯到《葡语百科》杂志创刊的历史。它还质疑了社会科学中解剖学概念的范围。从1994年开始出版的这本杂志的学术项目是复杂而雄心勃勃的。葡语学不是对“文化区域”研究的回顾,而是对政治分析的全面回顾,从最广泛的意义上说,来自经验界定的研究领域:葡萄牙历史和殖民所描绘的区域。这既是为了逃避当代“葡语派”的新帝国主义方法,也是为了克服对葡语派意识形态的简单负面批评(在文学、政治和经济方面),这些批评本身并没有为理解历史产生的现实提供工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lusotopie, Lusotopy. What Legacy, What Future?
The introduction of this issue goes back over the history of the creation of the Lusotopie journal. It also questions the scope of the concept of lusotopy in the social sciences. The intellectual project of the journal, published from 1994 onwards, was complex and ambitious. Lusotopie is not a review of “cultural-area” studies, but a generalist review of political analysis, in the broadest sense, from an empirically-delimited research field: that of the area drawn by Portuguese history and colonization. It was both to escape the contemporary neo-imperial approach of “Lusophony” and to overcome the simply negative criticism of the ideology of Lusophony (in its literary, political and economic aspects), which as such does not provide a tool for understanding the realities produced by history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lusotopie
Lusotopie HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信