理查德·恩尼斯的见解:过度曝光?公共养老基金对美国股市的依赖很大,可能比他们意识到的还要大

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Richard M. Ennis
{"title":"理查德·恩尼斯的见解:过度曝光?公共养老基金对美国股市的依赖很大,可能比他们意识到的还要大","authors":"Richard M. Ennis","doi":"10.3905/joi.2022.1.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite efforts to diversify internationally, public pension funds in the US have a significant, latent home-equity bias. The home bias takes on added importance in light of the extraordinary valuation level of the US stock market. All in all, public funds are betting heavily on the home market and paying up to do so. Caveat!","PeriodicalId":45504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Richard Ennis’s Insights: Overexposed? Public Pension Funds Have a Lot Riding on the US Stock Market, Possibly Even More than They Realize\",\"authors\":\"Richard M. Ennis\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/joi.2022.1.221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite efforts to diversify internationally, public pension funds in the US have a significant, latent home-equity bias. The home bias takes on added importance in light of the extraordinary valuation level of the US stock market. All in all, public funds are betting heavily on the home market and paying up to do so. Caveat!\",\"PeriodicalId\":45504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2022.1.221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2022.1.221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在国际上努力实现多元化,但美国的公共养老基金仍存在显著的、潜在的住房净值偏见。鉴于美国股市的估值水平非同寻常,国内偏好变得更加重要。总而言之,公共基金在国内市场上下了很大的赌注,并为此付出了代价。注意!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Richard Ennis’s Insights: Overexposed? Public Pension Funds Have a Lot Riding on the US Stock Market, Possibly Even More than They Realize
Despite efforts to diversify internationally, public pension funds in the US have a significant, latent home-equity bias. The home bias takes on added importance in light of the extraordinary valuation level of the US stock market. All in all, public funds are betting heavily on the home market and paying up to do so. Caveat!
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investing
Journal of Investing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信