{"title":"2019冠状病毒病下非洲的立法效力:在大流行期间努力防止行政部门越权和越权","authors":"Paul-Sewa Thovoethin, A. Moshood","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2022.2093905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Legislatures across the world fulfil core functions of representation, law-making, and oversight. Thus, governance goals of participation, transparency and accountability are directly related to these three functions. However, the COVID-19 crisis which started in China in late 2019 and spread to other countries in the world in 2020 disrupted these core functions by forcing the shut-down of parliaments out of concern for the safety of their members and the public in most countries in the world. As experienced in most countries during the COVID-19 crisis, legislatures in some instances were bypassed as presidents and prime ministers prioritise a rapid response. Further, there were conflicts in the manner in which responses were made to address the pandemic between the central government and sub-national governments, especially in federal states. Invariably, legislatures in most countries were marginalised, with greater power concentrated in the hands of the executive, especially at the central level of government. Paradoxically, even where a situation is so urgent that normal checks and balances must be suspended in favour of efficient decision-making, it is still crucial that parliaments play the roles of oversight that make democratic systems ultimately more durable, more effective and more just than any of the alternatives. The purpose of this work, therefore, is to examine how parliaments in Nigeria, South Africa and Ethiopia performed their core functions during the COVID-19 pandemic. It offers what parliaments under federal and parliamentary systems can do in order to prepare them to function effectively during an emergency. While it is to be hoped that a similar global crisis will not emerge in the near future or ever, the paper intends preparing legislatures in Africa to be more proactive and effective in dealing with diverse future challenges.","PeriodicalId":42455,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legislative effectiveness under COVID-19 in Africa: striving against executive branch overreach and underreach during pandemics\",\"authors\":\"Paul-Sewa Thovoethin, A. Moshood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20508840.2022.2093905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Legislatures across the world fulfil core functions of representation, law-making, and oversight. Thus, governance goals of participation, transparency and accountability are directly related to these three functions. However, the COVID-19 crisis which started in China in late 2019 and spread to other countries in the world in 2020 disrupted these core functions by forcing the shut-down of parliaments out of concern for the safety of their members and the public in most countries in the world. As experienced in most countries during the COVID-19 crisis, legislatures in some instances were bypassed as presidents and prime ministers prioritise a rapid response. Further, there were conflicts in the manner in which responses were made to address the pandemic between the central government and sub-national governments, especially in federal states. Invariably, legislatures in most countries were marginalised, with greater power concentrated in the hands of the executive, especially at the central level of government. Paradoxically, even where a situation is so urgent that normal checks and balances must be suspended in favour of efficient decision-making, it is still crucial that parliaments play the roles of oversight that make democratic systems ultimately more durable, more effective and more just than any of the alternatives. The purpose of this work, therefore, is to examine how parliaments in Nigeria, South Africa and Ethiopia performed their core functions during the COVID-19 pandemic. It offers what parliaments under federal and parliamentary systems can do in order to prepare them to function effectively during an emergency. While it is to be hoped that a similar global crisis will not emerge in the near future or ever, the paper intends preparing legislatures in Africa to be more proactive and effective in dealing with diverse future challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2093905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2093905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Legislative effectiveness under COVID-19 in Africa: striving against executive branch overreach and underreach during pandemics
ABSTRACT Legislatures across the world fulfil core functions of representation, law-making, and oversight. Thus, governance goals of participation, transparency and accountability are directly related to these three functions. However, the COVID-19 crisis which started in China in late 2019 and spread to other countries in the world in 2020 disrupted these core functions by forcing the shut-down of parliaments out of concern for the safety of their members and the public in most countries in the world. As experienced in most countries during the COVID-19 crisis, legislatures in some instances were bypassed as presidents and prime ministers prioritise a rapid response. Further, there were conflicts in the manner in which responses were made to address the pandemic between the central government and sub-national governments, especially in federal states. Invariably, legislatures in most countries were marginalised, with greater power concentrated in the hands of the executive, especially at the central level of government. Paradoxically, even where a situation is so urgent that normal checks and balances must be suspended in favour of efficient decision-making, it is still crucial that parliaments play the roles of oversight that make democratic systems ultimately more durable, more effective and more just than any of the alternatives. The purpose of this work, therefore, is to examine how parliaments in Nigeria, South Africa and Ethiopia performed their core functions during the COVID-19 pandemic. It offers what parliaments under federal and parliamentary systems can do in order to prepare them to function effectively during an emergency. While it is to be hoped that a similar global crisis will not emerge in the near future or ever, the paper intends preparing legislatures in Africa to be more proactive and effective in dealing with diverse future challenges.
期刊介绍:
The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.