“纸上的生活”:多夫曼和杨高佳的生活写作中的避难条件

A. Lo
{"title":"“纸上的生活”:多夫曼和杨高佳的生活写作中的避难条件","authors":"A. Lo","doi":"10.1353/ams.2020.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I draw attention to the need for new, critical forms of textual representation that can begin to discuss the liminal refugee figure, tracing Kao Kalia Yang’s refugee narrative against the autobiography of the self-proclaimed exile, Ariel Dorfman.  Unlike Dorfman’s Heading South, Looking North, which returns to a Modernist exile tradition of isolation and singularity while relegating the refugee to a position of silence, Yang’s The Latehomecomer negotiates the interconnected relationships between the writer and the collective, accepting the challenge of writing a refugee narrative.  Although both authors are pushed from their homelands and share a similar need for refuge, only one has the ability to strategically take on the label of “Exile” instead of “Refugee.” And, in doing so, Dorfman presents the “Exile” as the more legible status, one that allows for an intellectualized and singular retelling and that, inadvertently, creates a false dichotomy between the voiced exile and the voiceless refugee. With John Beverley’s notion of testimonio, which draws together the issues of representing voicelessness and collectivity, I argue that Yang provides an example of how to represent what is often portrayed as a silent and marginalized group.  Ultimately, by giving voice and agency to a peripheral collective, Yang’s memoir provides new models for thinking critically about refugee literature, particularly as it confronts Western traditions of understanding forced displacement and the construction of the refugee as a mass of silent victims.","PeriodicalId":80435,"journal":{"name":"American studies (Lawrence, Kan.)","volume":"59 1","pages":"23 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ams.2020.0031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Lives on Paper”: The Terms of Refuge in the Life Writings of Ariel Dorfman and Kao Kalia Yang\",\"authors\":\"A. Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ams.2020.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I draw attention to the need for new, critical forms of textual representation that can begin to discuss the liminal refugee figure, tracing Kao Kalia Yang’s refugee narrative against the autobiography of the self-proclaimed exile, Ariel Dorfman.  Unlike Dorfman’s Heading South, Looking North, which returns to a Modernist exile tradition of isolation and singularity while relegating the refugee to a position of silence, Yang’s The Latehomecomer negotiates the interconnected relationships between the writer and the collective, accepting the challenge of writing a refugee narrative.  Although both authors are pushed from their homelands and share a similar need for refuge, only one has the ability to strategically take on the label of “Exile” instead of “Refugee.” And, in doing so, Dorfman presents the “Exile” as the more legible status, one that allows for an intellectualized and singular retelling and that, inadvertently, creates a false dichotomy between the voiced exile and the voiceless refugee. With John Beverley’s notion of testimonio, which draws together the issues of representing voicelessness and collectivity, I argue that Yang provides an example of how to represent what is often portrayed as a silent and marginalized group.  Ultimately, by giving voice and agency to a peripheral collective, Yang’s memoir provides new models for thinking critically about refugee literature, particularly as it confronts Western traditions of understanding forced displacement and the construction of the refugee as a mass of silent victims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American studies (Lawrence, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ams.2020.0031\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American studies (Lawrence, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ams.2020.0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American studies (Lawrence, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ams.2020.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我提请注意对新的、批判性的文本表现形式的需要,这些文本表现形式可以开始讨论边缘性的难民形象,追踪高嘉丽·杨的难民叙事与自称为流亡者的阿里尔·多尔夫曼的自传。与多尔夫曼的《向南,向北看》不同,《后来者》回归了现代主义流亡传统的孤立和独特性,将难民置于沉默的位置,而杨的《后来者》则在作家与集体之间的相互联系中进行了协商,接受了书写难民叙事的挑战。虽然两位作者都被赶出了自己的家园,并且都有相似的避难需求,但只有一位作者有能力战略性地贴上“流亡”而不是“难民”的标签。在这样做的过程中,多尔夫曼将“流亡”呈现为一种更清晰的状态,一种允许理智和单一的复述的状态,无意中,在有声音的流亡者和没有声音的难民之间创造了一种错误的二分法。约翰·贝弗利(John Beverley)的证词概念将代表无声和集体的问题结合在一起,我认为杨提供了一个如何代表经常被描绘为沉默和边缘化群体的例子。最终,通过赋予边缘群体发言权和能动性,杨的回忆录为批判性地思考难民文学提供了新的模式,特别是当它面对西方理解被迫流离失所和将难民视为一群沉默的受害者的传统时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Lives on Paper”: The Terms of Refuge in the Life Writings of Ariel Dorfman and Kao Kalia Yang
In this paper, I draw attention to the need for new, critical forms of textual representation that can begin to discuss the liminal refugee figure, tracing Kao Kalia Yang’s refugee narrative against the autobiography of the self-proclaimed exile, Ariel Dorfman.  Unlike Dorfman’s Heading South, Looking North, which returns to a Modernist exile tradition of isolation and singularity while relegating the refugee to a position of silence, Yang’s The Latehomecomer negotiates the interconnected relationships between the writer and the collective, accepting the challenge of writing a refugee narrative.  Although both authors are pushed from their homelands and share a similar need for refuge, only one has the ability to strategically take on the label of “Exile” instead of “Refugee.” And, in doing so, Dorfman presents the “Exile” as the more legible status, one that allows for an intellectualized and singular retelling and that, inadvertently, creates a false dichotomy between the voiced exile and the voiceless refugee. With John Beverley’s notion of testimonio, which draws together the issues of representing voicelessness and collectivity, I argue that Yang provides an example of how to represent what is often portrayed as a silent and marginalized group.  Ultimately, by giving voice and agency to a peripheral collective, Yang’s memoir provides new models for thinking critically about refugee literature, particularly as it confronts Western traditions of understanding forced displacement and the construction of the refugee as a mass of silent victims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信