{"title":"Benoît Godin(1958–2021)","authors":"D. Vinck","doi":"10.1080/19378629.2021.1893915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is with sadness that I must write that Benoît Godin passed away on 5 January 2021. He was a prolific and internationally renowned researcher, known for his original work on the history of measurement statistics in science, technology and innovation; on the history of science and research concepts and models; and on cultures of quantification and metrics. In the last fifteen years of his career, he had turned his attention to the intellectual history of innovation (the idea of innovation and its theology), scrutinizing how the term innovation was used and by which actors, from Greek Antiquity to the present day. In the context of this colossal work, he showed, among other things, that the positive (‘superlative’, he said) connotation of the term is very contemporary, whereas it had rather been used as an anathema throughout history until the late 1960s or early 1970s. After a master’s degree in political science at Laval University in Canada, followed by a doctoral thesis at the SciencePolicy ResearchUnit (SPRU) of theUniversity of Sussex inGreat Britain, defended in 1994, Godin began his career as a Professor at INRS (Institut national de la recherche scientifique, center Urbanisation Culture Société, inMontreal, Canada) in 1993. A creative andprodigious scholar, hewas entirely devoted to research –his only declared hobbieswere listening to baroquemusic and taking longwalkswith his dogs –andpursued that research with the greatest intellectual rigor and honesty. He leaves an impressive contribution to the study of the history of science and innovation, including the history of the perception of science and innovation in economic theory and society. Perhaps out of modesty, he did not consider himself a historian in his own right, although he made landmark contributions to the history of ideas. He has authored numerous publications, including frequent articles in leading STS journals, as well as important monographs. To name a few: Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries (Routledge, 2015); Models of Innovation: The History of an Idea (MIT Press, 2017); Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias (which we co-edited and which was published by Edward Elgar in 2017); The Invention of Technological Innovation. Languages, Discourses and Ideology in Historical Perspective (Edward Elgar, 2019); and his latest book: The Idea of Technological Innovation: A Brief Alternative History (Edward Elgar, 2020). Godin was also heavily involved in the editorial work of a dozen journals. In particular, he was for many years a member of the editorial board of the journal Innovations, Journal of Innovation Economics&Management. Hewas oneof themost committed and activemembers ofMinerva’s editorial board. Benoît Godin loved to bring together researchers fromdifferent backgrounds to embark on intellectual adventures that often aimed to shake up what he considered to be the mainstreamof research. Anunclassifiable researcher, hewas very critical of the field of innovation studies. Moreover, he was relatively distant from STS, even though he published","PeriodicalId":49207,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"6 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19378629.2021.1893915","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benoît Godin (1958–2021)\",\"authors\":\"D. Vinck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19378629.2021.1893915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is with sadness that I must write that Benoît Godin passed away on 5 January 2021. He was a prolific and internationally renowned researcher, known for his original work on the history of measurement statistics in science, technology and innovation; on the history of science and research concepts and models; and on cultures of quantification and metrics. In the last fifteen years of his career, he had turned his attention to the intellectual history of innovation (the idea of innovation and its theology), scrutinizing how the term innovation was used and by which actors, from Greek Antiquity to the present day. In the context of this colossal work, he showed, among other things, that the positive (‘superlative’, he said) connotation of the term is very contemporary, whereas it had rather been used as an anathema throughout history until the late 1960s or early 1970s. After a master’s degree in political science at Laval University in Canada, followed by a doctoral thesis at the SciencePolicy ResearchUnit (SPRU) of theUniversity of Sussex inGreat Britain, defended in 1994, Godin began his career as a Professor at INRS (Institut national de la recherche scientifique, center Urbanisation Culture Société, inMontreal, Canada) in 1993. A creative andprodigious scholar, hewas entirely devoted to research –his only declared hobbieswere listening to baroquemusic and taking longwalkswith his dogs –andpursued that research with the greatest intellectual rigor and honesty. He leaves an impressive contribution to the study of the history of science and innovation, including the history of the perception of science and innovation in economic theory and society. Perhaps out of modesty, he did not consider himself a historian in his own right, although he made landmark contributions to the history of ideas. He has authored numerous publications, including frequent articles in leading STS journals, as well as important monographs. To name a few: Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries (Routledge, 2015); Models of Innovation: The History of an Idea (MIT Press, 2017); Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias (which we co-edited and which was published by Edward Elgar in 2017); The Invention of Technological Innovation. Languages, Discourses and Ideology in Historical Perspective (Edward Elgar, 2019); and his latest book: The Idea of Technological Innovation: A Brief Alternative History (Edward Elgar, 2020). Godin was also heavily involved in the editorial work of a dozen journals. In particular, he was for many years a member of the editorial board of the journal Innovations, Journal of Innovation Economics&Management. Hewas oneof themost committed and activemembers ofMinerva’s editorial board. Benoît Godin loved to bring together researchers fromdifferent backgrounds to embark on intellectual adventures that often aimed to shake up what he considered to be the mainstreamof research. Anunclassifiable researcher, hewas very critical of the field of innovation studies. Moreover, he was relatively distant from STS, even though he published\",\"PeriodicalId\":49207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Studies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"6 - 7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19378629.2021.1893915\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2021.1893915\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Studies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2021.1893915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我必须悲伤地宣布,贝诺··戈丁于2021年1月5日去世。他是一位多产的国际知名研究员,以其在科学、技术和创新中的测量统计历史方面的原创作品而闻名;论科学史的研究理念与模式以及量化和度量的文化。在他职业生涯的最后15年里,他把注意力转向了创新的思想史(创新的概念及其神学),仔细研究了从古希腊到现代,创新一词是如何使用的,以及由哪些行动者使用的。在这部巨著的背景下,除其他事项外,他还展示了这个词的积极含义(他说,“最高级”)是非常现代的,而直到20世纪60年代末或70年代初,它一直被用作历史上的诅咒。戈丁在加拿大拉瓦尔大学获得政治学硕士学位,并于1994年在英国苏塞克斯大学科学政策研究中心(SPRU)发表博士论文,1993年开始他的职业生涯,在INRS(位于加拿大蒙特利尔的城市化和社会文化研究中心)担任教授。他是一位富有创造力和才华横溢的学者,他全身心地投入到研究中——他唯一公开宣称的爱好是听巴洛克音乐和带着他的狗长时间散步——并以最高的智力严谨和诚实进行研究。他对科学和创新的历史研究做出了令人印象深刻的贡献,包括对科学的认识以及经济理论和社会创新的历史。也许是出于谦虚,尽管他在思想史上做出了里程碑式的贡献,但他并不认为自己是一名历史学家。他撰写了许多出版物,包括经常在领先的STS期刊上发表文章,以及重要的专著。举几个例子:有争议的创新:几个世纪以来的创新理念(劳特利奇,2015);创新模型:一个想法的历史(麻省理工学院出版社,2017);创新的批判性研究:支持创新偏见的替代方法(我们共同编辑,由爱德华·埃尔加于2017年出版);技术创新的发明。历史视角下的语言、话语和意识形态(爱德华·埃尔加,2019);以及他的最新著作:《技术创新的理念:一个简短的替代历史》(爱德华·埃尔加,2020年)。戈丁还积极参与了十几家期刊的编辑工作。特别值得一提的是,他曾多年担任《创新经济与管理期刊》(journal of Innovation Economics&Management)编委会成员。他是密涅瓦编辑委员会中最忠诚、最活跃的成员之一。贝诺·戈丁喜欢把不同背景的研究人员聚集在一起,进行智力冒险,目的往往是动摇他所认为的主流研究。作为一个无法归类的研究者,他对创新研究领域持非常批判的态度。此外,尽管他发表了文章,但他与STS的关系相对较远
It is with sadness that I must write that Benoît Godin passed away on 5 January 2021. He was a prolific and internationally renowned researcher, known for his original work on the history of measurement statistics in science, technology and innovation; on the history of science and research concepts and models; and on cultures of quantification and metrics. In the last fifteen years of his career, he had turned his attention to the intellectual history of innovation (the idea of innovation and its theology), scrutinizing how the term innovation was used and by which actors, from Greek Antiquity to the present day. In the context of this colossal work, he showed, among other things, that the positive (‘superlative’, he said) connotation of the term is very contemporary, whereas it had rather been used as an anathema throughout history until the late 1960s or early 1970s. After a master’s degree in political science at Laval University in Canada, followed by a doctoral thesis at the SciencePolicy ResearchUnit (SPRU) of theUniversity of Sussex inGreat Britain, defended in 1994, Godin began his career as a Professor at INRS (Institut national de la recherche scientifique, center Urbanisation Culture Société, inMontreal, Canada) in 1993. A creative andprodigious scholar, hewas entirely devoted to research –his only declared hobbieswere listening to baroquemusic and taking longwalkswith his dogs –andpursued that research with the greatest intellectual rigor and honesty. He leaves an impressive contribution to the study of the history of science and innovation, including the history of the perception of science and innovation in economic theory and society. Perhaps out of modesty, he did not consider himself a historian in his own right, although he made landmark contributions to the history of ideas. He has authored numerous publications, including frequent articles in leading STS journals, as well as important monographs. To name a few: Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries (Routledge, 2015); Models of Innovation: The History of an Idea (MIT Press, 2017); Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias (which we co-edited and which was published by Edward Elgar in 2017); The Invention of Technological Innovation. Languages, Discourses and Ideology in Historical Perspective (Edward Elgar, 2019); and his latest book: The Idea of Technological Innovation: A Brief Alternative History (Edward Elgar, 2020). Godin was also heavily involved in the editorial work of a dozen journals. In particular, he was for many years a member of the editorial board of the journal Innovations, Journal of Innovation Economics&Management. Hewas oneof themost committed and activemembers ofMinerva’s editorial board. Benoît Godin loved to bring together researchers fromdifferent backgrounds to embark on intellectual adventures that often aimed to shake up what he considered to be the mainstreamof research. Anunclassifiable researcher, hewas very critical of the field of innovation studies. Moreover, he was relatively distant from STS, even though he published
Engineering StudiesENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Engineering Studies is an interdisciplinary, international journal devoted to the scholarly study of engineers and engineering. Its mission is threefold:
1. to advance critical analysis in historical, social, cultural, political, philosophical, rhetorical, and organizational studies of engineers and engineering;
2. to help build and serve diverse communities of researchers interested in engineering studies;
3. to link scholarly work in engineering studies with broader discussions and debates about engineering education, research, practice, policy, and representation.
The editors of Engineering Studies are interested in papers that consider the following questions:
• How does this paper enhance critical understanding of engineers or engineering?
• What are the relationships among the technical and nontechnical dimensions of engineering practices, and how do these relationships change over time and from place to place?