残疾学生150年教育:取得的进展和仍然存在的挑战。客座编辑

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Karen de Bruin
{"title":"残疾学生150年教育:取得的进展和仍然存在的挑战。客座编辑","authors":"Karen de Bruin","doi":"10.1177/00049441221131875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and Saggers in the third article. This article presents an examination of what drives and what hinders the transformation to a single inclusive system in Queensland, the Australian jurisdiction with the most progressive policy for inclusive education in Australia. The following two articles, both by Elizabeth Dickson, examine the legal barriers to inclusive education for school students with disability. The fourth article considers the shortcomings of the DDA itself, while the fi fth article examines the adversarial nature of the legal system within which it functions. The sixth article by Tanya Serry, Pamela Snow, Lorraine Hammond, Emina McLean and Jane McCormack considers the preparation for teachers to work in inclusive classrooms through the example of reading in-struction. Their fi ndings highlight lingering attitudinal barriers within the teaching workforce, and those who prepare them, as many teachers expressed low con fi dence in their capability to support students experiencing reading dif fi culties, low expectations of those students ’ capacity to learn and make progress, and a view that the learning of students with disability is the responsibility of specialists beyond the general education classroom. The seventh and fi nal article by Tim Pitman and Matthew Brett considers how inclusion and disability are themselves conceptualised and traces the trajectory of conceptual models over the past 150 years through the example of higher education policy. The authors conclude by noting the lingering traces of historical thinking such as charity and welfarism within contemporary policy and argue for a new model, grounded in what they term (A)ccessibility, that would genuinely support the agency and educational aspirations of students with disability.","PeriodicalId":46741,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"150 years of Education for Students with Disability: Progress Made and Remaining Challenges. Guest Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Karen de Bruin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00049441221131875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and Saggers in the third article. This article presents an examination of what drives and what hinders the transformation to a single inclusive system in Queensland, the Australian jurisdiction with the most progressive policy for inclusive education in Australia. The following two articles, both by Elizabeth Dickson, examine the legal barriers to inclusive education for school students with disability. The fourth article considers the shortcomings of the DDA itself, while the fi fth article examines the adversarial nature of the legal system within which it functions. The sixth article by Tanya Serry, Pamela Snow, Lorraine Hammond, Emina McLean and Jane McCormack considers the preparation for teachers to work in inclusive classrooms through the example of reading in-struction. Their fi ndings highlight lingering attitudinal barriers within the teaching workforce, and those who prepare them, as many teachers expressed low con fi dence in their capability to support students experiencing reading dif fi culties, low expectations of those students ’ capacity to learn and make progress, and a view that the learning of students with disability is the responsibility of specialists beyond the general education classroom. The seventh and fi nal article by Tim Pitman and Matthew Brett considers how inclusion and disability are themselves conceptualised and traces the trajectory of conceptual models over the past 150 years through the example of higher education policy. The authors conclude by noting the lingering traces of historical thinking such as charity and welfarism within contemporary policy and argue for a new model, grounded in what they term (A)ccessibility, that would genuinely support the agency and educational aspirations of students with disability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221131875\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221131875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

和第三篇文章中的萨格斯。这篇文章介绍了是什么推动和阻碍了昆士兰向单一包容性体系的转变,这是澳大利亚包容性教育政策最进步的澳大利亚司法管辖区。以下两篇文章都是伊丽莎白·迪克森(Elizabeth Dickson)写的,探讨了残疾学生接受全纳教育的法律障碍。第4条考虑了DDA本身的缺点,而第5条审查了其运作的法律制度的对抗性。第六篇文章由Tanya Serry, Pamela Snow, Lorraine Hammond, Emina McLean和Jane McCormack撰写,通过阅读教学为教师在包容性课堂中工作做准备。他们的研究结果突出了教师队伍和准备教师队伍中挥之不去的态度障碍,因为许多教师对自己支持有阅读困难的学生的能力缺乏信心,对这些学生的学习和进步能力期望不高,并且认为残疾学生的学习是普通教育课堂之外的专家的责任。蒂姆·皮特曼和马修·布雷特的第七篇也是最后一篇文章考虑了包容和残疾本身是如何概念化的,并通过高等教育政策的例子追溯了过去150年来概念模型的发展轨迹。作者最后指出,慈善和福利主义等历史思想在当代政策中留下了挥之不去的痕迹,并提出了一种新的模式,以他们所谓的(a)可达性为基础,这将真正支持残疾学生的代理和教育愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
150 years of Education for Students with Disability: Progress Made and Remaining Challenges. Guest Editorial
and Saggers in the third article. This article presents an examination of what drives and what hinders the transformation to a single inclusive system in Queensland, the Australian jurisdiction with the most progressive policy for inclusive education in Australia. The following two articles, both by Elizabeth Dickson, examine the legal barriers to inclusive education for school students with disability. The fourth article considers the shortcomings of the DDA itself, while the fi fth article examines the adversarial nature of the legal system within which it functions. The sixth article by Tanya Serry, Pamela Snow, Lorraine Hammond, Emina McLean and Jane McCormack considers the preparation for teachers to work in inclusive classrooms through the example of reading in-struction. Their fi ndings highlight lingering attitudinal barriers within the teaching workforce, and those who prepare them, as many teachers expressed low con fi dence in their capability to support students experiencing reading dif fi culties, low expectations of those students ’ capacity to learn and make progress, and a view that the learning of students with disability is the responsibility of specialists beyond the general education classroom. The seventh and fi nal article by Tim Pitman and Matthew Brett considers how inclusion and disability are themselves conceptualised and traces the trajectory of conceptual models over the past 150 years through the example of higher education policy. The authors conclude by noting the lingering traces of historical thinking such as charity and welfarism within contemporary policy and argue for a new model, grounded in what they term (A)ccessibility, that would genuinely support the agency and educational aspirations of students with disability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Education
Australian Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Education was established in 1957 under the editorship of Professor Bill Connell. Drawing upon research conducted in Australia and internationally, the AJE aims to inform educational researchers as well as educators, administrators and policymakers about issues of contemporary concern in education. The AJE seeks to publish research studies that contribute to educational knowledge and research methodologies, and that review findings of research studies. Its scope embraces all fields of education and training. In addition to publishing research studies about education it also publishes articles that address education in relation to other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信