Shelley Fulton, Tyson Baird, Siang Naik, K. Stiller
{"title":"下肢截肢患者的预康复治疗可减少急性住院时间和总住院时间:一项回顾性、匹配、病例对照的试点服务评估","authors":"Shelley Fulton, Tyson Baird, Siang Naik, K. Stiller","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2020.0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Prehabilitation’ refers to interventions that seek to enhance a person's functional capacity to help withstand a forthcoming stressor, such as major surgery. There is little research evaluating prehabilitation before major lower limb amputation. This study evaluated if a comprehensive multidisciplinary pre-admission programme, which included prehabilitation plus other interventions (eg education, home assessment and modifications), hereinafter called ‘prehabilitation-plus’, might shorten hospital length of stay by allowing earlier discharge home from hospital after major lower limb amputation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prehabilitation-plus on hospital length of stay and discharge destination for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation. Seven patients receiving prehabilitation-plus were retrospectively matched with seven control patients in this case-controlled pilot service evaluation. Prehabilitation-plus was provided by a multidisciplinary team. Hospital length of stay was compared using Mann–Whitney U tests and discharge destination using Fisher's exact test. Acute hospital and total hospital length of stay were significantly lower in the prehabilitation-plus group than the control group (P=0.038 and 0.011 respectively). No significant difference was seen for rehabilitation hospital length of stay (P=0.400). More prehabilitation-plus patients were discharged directly home after their acute hospital stay, but this was not significant (P=0.286). Patients who received prehabilitation-plus had reduced acute hospital and total hospital length of stay compared to matched control patients. While these preliminary results are promising for the ability of programmes such as prehabilitation-plus to reduce hospital length of stay, further studies with more robust designs are required to confirm and extend this finding.","PeriodicalId":46562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehabilitation-plus for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation may reduce acute hospital and total hospital length of stay: a retrospective, matched, case-controlled pilot service evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Shelley Fulton, Tyson Baird, Siang Naik, K. Stiller\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/ijtr.2020.0156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘Prehabilitation’ refers to interventions that seek to enhance a person's functional capacity to help withstand a forthcoming stressor, such as major surgery. There is little research evaluating prehabilitation before major lower limb amputation. This study evaluated if a comprehensive multidisciplinary pre-admission programme, which included prehabilitation plus other interventions (eg education, home assessment and modifications), hereinafter called ‘prehabilitation-plus’, might shorten hospital length of stay by allowing earlier discharge home from hospital after major lower limb amputation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prehabilitation-plus on hospital length of stay and discharge destination for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation. Seven patients receiving prehabilitation-plus were retrospectively matched with seven control patients in this case-controlled pilot service evaluation. Prehabilitation-plus was provided by a multidisciplinary team. Hospital length of stay was compared using Mann–Whitney U tests and discharge destination using Fisher's exact test. Acute hospital and total hospital length of stay were significantly lower in the prehabilitation-plus group than the control group (P=0.038 and 0.011 respectively). No significant difference was seen for rehabilitation hospital length of stay (P=0.400). More prehabilitation-plus patients were discharged directly home after their acute hospital stay, but this was not significant (P=0.286). Patients who received prehabilitation-plus had reduced acute hospital and total hospital length of stay compared to matched control patients. While these preliminary results are promising for the ability of programmes such as prehabilitation-plus to reduce hospital length of stay, further studies with more robust designs are required to confirm and extend this finding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2020.0156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2020.0156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prehabilitation-plus for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation may reduce acute hospital and total hospital length of stay: a retrospective, matched, case-controlled pilot service evaluation
‘Prehabilitation’ refers to interventions that seek to enhance a person's functional capacity to help withstand a forthcoming stressor, such as major surgery. There is little research evaluating prehabilitation before major lower limb amputation. This study evaluated if a comprehensive multidisciplinary pre-admission programme, which included prehabilitation plus other interventions (eg education, home assessment and modifications), hereinafter called ‘prehabilitation-plus’, might shorten hospital length of stay by allowing earlier discharge home from hospital after major lower limb amputation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prehabilitation-plus on hospital length of stay and discharge destination for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation. Seven patients receiving prehabilitation-plus were retrospectively matched with seven control patients in this case-controlled pilot service evaluation. Prehabilitation-plus was provided by a multidisciplinary team. Hospital length of stay was compared using Mann–Whitney U tests and discharge destination using Fisher's exact test. Acute hospital and total hospital length of stay were significantly lower in the prehabilitation-plus group than the control group (P=0.038 and 0.011 respectively). No significant difference was seen for rehabilitation hospital length of stay (P=0.400). More prehabilitation-plus patients were discharged directly home after their acute hospital stay, but this was not significant (P=0.286). Patients who received prehabilitation-plus had reduced acute hospital and total hospital length of stay compared to matched control patients. While these preliminary results are promising for the ability of programmes such as prehabilitation-plus to reduce hospital length of stay, further studies with more robust designs are required to confirm and extend this finding.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (IJTR) publishes original research, providing a platform for the latest key research findings in therapy and rehabilitation. Review and analysis articles are invited internationally to enable the sharing of practices and developments worldwide, and to raise awareness of different cultural influences in health care. IJTR provides an interdisciplinary approach to therapy and rehabilitation by: -Providing a well-referenced source of information to all professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation worldwide, including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, chiropodists and podiatrists, radiographers, speech and language therapists and orthoptists -Providing a peer-reviewed source of original research and information presented in an accessible, informative and professional medium -Providing a forum for the discussion of new ideas, information and issues relating to therapy and rehabilitation -Creating an awareness of the national and international issues affecting professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation -Encouraging collaboration and sharing of new ideas between professions worldwide