{"title":"政府公共关系和社交媒体:弥合有社会福利问题的人的数字鸿沟","authors":"S. Haryanti, E. Rusfian","doi":"10.22146/JKAP.34602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is a public relations inquiry that aims to describe the use of social media by govern-ment public relations to bridge the digital divide that affects people with social welfare prob-lems. The research, unlike most public relations studies that by and large, focus on organiza-tional image, reputation, communication crisis, and transparency, uses the digital divide per-spective. The research uses Grunig and Hunt Public Relations model and Melvin De Fleur com-munication model perspectives to examine the communication processes that occur through government public relations social media. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach to assess the communication conducted by informants. The results showed that government pub-lic relations communication through social media has not been fully able to bridge the digital divide, especially in rural areas. The digital divide creates three relates problems that affect the effectiveness of government communication with people that experience social welfare problem. Firstly, pattern of communication involves opinion leaders. Secondly, most feedback occurs in-directly while ideally, it should be direct. Thirdly, the flow of information takes place in either one or two steps, in contrast with the ideal, which should be in one step.","PeriodicalId":30969,"journal":{"name":"JKAP Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems\",\"authors\":\"S. Haryanti, E. Rusfian\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/JKAP.34602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is a public relations inquiry that aims to describe the use of social media by govern-ment public relations to bridge the digital divide that affects people with social welfare prob-lems. The research, unlike most public relations studies that by and large, focus on organiza-tional image, reputation, communication crisis, and transparency, uses the digital divide per-spective. The research uses Grunig and Hunt Public Relations model and Melvin De Fleur com-munication model perspectives to examine the communication processes that occur through government public relations social media. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach to assess the communication conducted by informants. The results showed that government pub-lic relations communication through social media has not been fully able to bridge the digital divide, especially in rural areas. The digital divide creates three relates problems that affect the effectiveness of government communication with people that experience social welfare problem. Firstly, pattern of communication involves opinion leaders. Secondly, most feedback occurs in-directly while ideally, it should be direct. Thirdly, the flow of information takes place in either one or two steps, in contrast with the ideal, which should be in one step.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JKAP Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JKAP Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/JKAP.34602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JKAP Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/JKAP.34602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
这项研究是一项公共关系调查,旨在描述政府公共关系部门使用社交媒体来弥合影响有社会福利问题的人的数字鸿沟。与大多数公共关系研究不同的是,这项研究主要关注组织形象、声誉、沟通危机和透明度,它使用了数字鸿沟。该研究使用Grunig和Hunt公共关系模型以及Melvin De Fleur通信模型的视角来检验通过政府公共关系社交媒体发生的通信过程。该研究采用定性描述性方法来评估举报人进行的沟通。结果表明,通过社交媒体进行的政府公共关系沟通并不能完全弥合数字鸿沟,尤其是在农村地区。数字鸿沟造成了三个相关问题,影响了政府与经历社会福利问题的人沟通的有效性。首先,沟通模式涉及意见领袖。其次,大多数反馈都是直接发生的,而理想情况下,它应该是直接的。第三,信息的流动是分一步或两步进行的,而理想情况下应该分一步进行。
Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems
This study is a public relations inquiry that aims to describe the use of social media by govern-ment public relations to bridge the digital divide that affects people with social welfare prob-lems. The research, unlike most public relations studies that by and large, focus on organiza-tional image, reputation, communication crisis, and transparency, uses the digital divide per-spective. The research uses Grunig and Hunt Public Relations model and Melvin De Fleur com-munication model perspectives to examine the communication processes that occur through government public relations social media. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach to assess the communication conducted by informants. The results showed that government pub-lic relations communication through social media has not been fully able to bridge the digital divide, especially in rural areas. The digital divide creates three relates problems that affect the effectiveness of government communication with people that experience social welfare problem. Firstly, pattern of communication involves opinion leaders. Secondly, most feedback occurs in-directly while ideally, it should be direct. Thirdly, the flow of information takes place in either one or two steps, in contrast with the ideal, which should be in one step.