为自己说话:心理分析、自我理论和多元自我

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
C. Laubender
{"title":"为自己说话:心理分析、自我理论和多元自我","authors":"C. Laubender","doi":"10.1353/arq.2020.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I explore the status of the self in autotheory, bringing Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams together with autotheory’s most popular text, Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts, to consider the movement in contemporary autotheory away from the split subject and toward of what I call a “plural self.” Reading Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams as a species, avant la lettre, of autotheory, I chart how Freud’s writing challenged the coherence of the self and introduced the now critically embraced theory of the split subject. While this theory has long been a favored tool for enabling critiques of the self, I claim that recent versions of autotheory have deliberately dispensed with the deconstructed split subject in order instead to construct a plural self. Reading The Argonauts, I consider how this plural self is motivated by a principally ethico-political desire to (re)imagine the self relationally, where self and other are reconfigured as collaborative and cumulative. Ultimately, this article asks what promise for relational solidarity a notion of the plural self holds, and where this promise might find its limit.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"76 1","pages":"39 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/arq.2020.0001","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speak for Your Self: Psychoanalysis, Autotheory, and The Plural Self\",\"authors\":\"C. Laubender\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/arq.2020.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I explore the status of the self in autotheory, bringing Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams together with autotheory’s most popular text, Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts, to consider the movement in contemporary autotheory away from the split subject and toward of what I call a “plural self.” Reading Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams as a species, avant la lettre, of autotheory, I chart how Freud’s writing challenged the coherence of the self and introduced the now critically embraced theory of the split subject. While this theory has long been a favored tool for enabling critiques of the self, I claim that recent versions of autotheory have deliberately dispensed with the deconstructed split subject in order instead to construct a plural self. Reading The Argonauts, I consider how this plural self is motivated by a principally ethico-political desire to (re)imagine the self relationally, where self and other are reconfigured as collaborative and cumulative. Ultimately, this article asks what promise for relational solidarity a notion of the plural self holds, and where this promise might find its limit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/arq.2020.0001\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2020.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2020.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在这篇文章中,我探讨了自我在自论中的地位,将弗洛伊德的《梦的解释》与自论最流行的文本玛吉·纳尔逊的《阿尔戈英雄》结合在一起,来考虑当代自论中的运动,从分裂的主体转向我所谓的“多元自我”。阅读弗洛伊德的《梦的解释》,把它作为一个物种,作为自论的先锋派,我描绘了弗洛伊德的作品是如何挑战自我的一致性,并引入了现在被批判性地接受的分裂主体理论。虽然这一理论长期以来一直是对自我进行批判的有利工具,但我认为,最近版本的自我理论故意摒弃了解构的分裂主体,以构建一个多元的自我。在阅读《阿尔戈英雄》时,我思考了这个多元自我是如何被一种主要的伦理政治欲望所激发的,这种欲望是为了(重新)想象自我的关系,在这种关系中,自我和他人被重新配置为合作和积累。最后,这篇文章询问了多重自我的概念对关系团结的承诺是什么,以及这种承诺在哪里可能会发现它的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speak for Your Self: Psychoanalysis, Autotheory, and The Plural Self
In this article, I explore the status of the self in autotheory, bringing Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams together with autotheory’s most popular text, Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts, to consider the movement in contemporary autotheory away from the split subject and toward of what I call a “plural self.” Reading Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams as a species, avant la lettre, of autotheory, I chart how Freud’s writing challenged the coherence of the self and introduced the now critically embraced theory of the split subject. While this theory has long been a favored tool for enabling critiques of the self, I claim that recent versions of autotheory have deliberately dispensed with the deconstructed split subject in order instead to construct a plural self. Reading The Argonauts, I consider how this plural self is motivated by a principally ethico-political desire to (re)imagine the self relationally, where self and other are reconfigured as collaborative and cumulative. Ultimately, this article asks what promise for relational solidarity a notion of the plural self holds, and where this promise might find its limit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arizona Quarterly
Arizona Quarterly LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信