Investigation of the trade-off between the complexity of the accelerometer bias model and the state estimation accuracy in INS/GNSS integration

Abstract The integration of Inertial Navigation Systems and Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) represents the core navigation unit for mobile platforms in open sky environments. A realistic assessment of the accuracy of the navigation solution depends on the accurate modelling of inertial sensor errors. Sensor noise and biases contribute most to short-term navigation errors. For the latter, different models can be used, varying in complexity. This paper investigates how the use of two different models for the accelerometer bias affects the accuracy of the state estimate in an extended Kalman filter. For this purpose, the Allan variance technique is applied to a data sequence from a specific inertial sensor to identify and quantify the underlying noise processes. The estimated noise parameters are used to characterise a bias model for the accelerometers that in addition to the static bias model takes non-white noise processes of the inertial sensor under investigation into account. This detailed accelerometer bias model is compared to a classical modelling approach that only considers static biases. Both approaches are evaluated based on simulation studies for continuous and intermittent GNSS coverages. The results show no significant difference between the two modelling approaches in terms of horizontal position and attitude precision. Furthermore, the correctness of the accelerometer bias estimates is not significantly affected by the modelling approach. All in all, it can be concluded that a detailed bias model of the accelerometers does not outperform the classical modelling approach.