照亮一个隐藏的遗址

IF 1.3 0 ARCHITECTURE
M. Padua
{"title":"照亮一个隐藏的遗址","authors":"M. Padua","doi":"10.3368/lj.42.1.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was provoked by the recent detection of 541 unmarked burials signifying the recovery of the African American Burial Ground (AABG) on the grounds of Woodland Cemetery (WC) at Clemson University, South Carolina. A case study analysis of this coexistent sacred burial ground, initially for enslaved individuals of African descent interred during the pre-emancipation plantation era, seeks answers to fundamental questions: Was Clemson University aware of the AABG’s existence, and why did it take so long to act on preserving this sacred ground, historically known to the local descendant community? This study reveals that Clemson University’s negligence and cultural erasure during the 20th century has in the present day given way to an institutional commitment to truth-telling brought on by student activism and concerns about long-standing social inequities. The recovery of the AABG aligns with and contributes to work on “Black Geographies” and “Black Landscapes” (Woods, 2000; McKittrick & Woods, 2007; Boone, 2020; Hood 2020). The study examines the national reckoning among universities as they consider the legacy of slavery at their institutions and navigate justice (Wilder, 2014; Harris, et al., 2019). This research draws upon the author’s larger study on South Carolina’s landscape legacy and the synthesis of novel typologies beyond the normative classification of cultural landscapes (Padua, 2020). The commemoration of the AABG on campus is explored as a potential “reconciliatory landscape” conceptualized through the lens of “retrospective justice” drawn from the human rights literature (Russell, 2003; Roth, 2004). Status-quo attitudes are questioned as disruption to the norm instigates change and asserts social justice.","PeriodicalId":54062,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"53 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illuminating a Hidden Site\",\"authors\":\"M. Padua\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/lj.42.1.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was provoked by the recent detection of 541 unmarked burials signifying the recovery of the African American Burial Ground (AABG) on the grounds of Woodland Cemetery (WC) at Clemson University, South Carolina. A case study analysis of this coexistent sacred burial ground, initially for enslaved individuals of African descent interred during the pre-emancipation plantation era, seeks answers to fundamental questions: Was Clemson University aware of the AABG’s existence, and why did it take so long to act on preserving this sacred ground, historically known to the local descendant community? This study reveals that Clemson University’s negligence and cultural erasure during the 20th century has in the present day given way to an institutional commitment to truth-telling brought on by student activism and concerns about long-standing social inequities. The recovery of the AABG aligns with and contributes to work on “Black Geographies” and “Black Landscapes” (Woods, 2000; McKittrick & Woods, 2007; Boone, 2020; Hood 2020). The study examines the national reckoning among universities as they consider the legacy of slavery at their institutions and navigate justice (Wilder, 2014; Harris, et al., 2019). This research draws upon the author’s larger study on South Carolina’s landscape legacy and the synthesis of novel typologies beyond the normative classification of cultural landscapes (Padua, 2020). The commemoration of the AABG on campus is explored as a potential “reconciliatory landscape” conceptualized through the lens of “retrospective justice” drawn from the human rights literature (Russell, 2003; Roth, 2004). Status-quo attitudes are questioned as disruption to the norm instigates change and asserts social justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape Journal\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"53 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.42.1.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.42.1.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究是由最近在南卡罗来纳州克莱姆森大学伍德兰公墓(WC)发现的541个无标记墓地引发的,这些墓地标志着非裔美国人墓地(AABG)的恢复。对这个共存的神圣墓地的案例研究分析,最初是为解放前种植园时代埋葬的非洲裔被奴役者提供的,旨在寻找根本问题的答案:克莱姆森大学是否意识到AABG的存在,以及为什么花了这么长时间才采取行动来保护这个历史上为当地后裔社区所知的圣地?这项研究表明,克莱姆森大学在20世纪的疏忽和文化抹杀,在今天已经让位于学生激进主义和对长期社会不平等的担忧所带来的对讲真话的制度承诺。AABG的恢复符合并有助于“黑人地理”和“黑人景观”的工作(Woods,2000;McKittrick和Woods,2007;Boone,2020;Hood 2020)。这项研究考察了大学在考虑奴隶制在其机构中的遗留问题并伸张正义时的国家清算(Wilder,2014;Harris等人,2019)。这项研究借鉴了作者对南卡罗来纳州景观遗产的更大规模研究,以及对文化景观规范分类之外的小说类型学的综合(Padua,2020)。校园内对AABG的纪念被探索为一种潜在的“和解景观”,通过从人权文献中提取的“追溯性正义”的视角进行概念化(Russell,2003;Roth,2004)。现状态度受到质疑,因为对规范的破坏会引发变革并维护社会正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Illuminating a Hidden Site
This study was provoked by the recent detection of 541 unmarked burials signifying the recovery of the African American Burial Ground (AABG) on the grounds of Woodland Cemetery (WC) at Clemson University, South Carolina. A case study analysis of this coexistent sacred burial ground, initially for enslaved individuals of African descent interred during the pre-emancipation plantation era, seeks answers to fundamental questions: Was Clemson University aware of the AABG’s existence, and why did it take so long to act on preserving this sacred ground, historically known to the local descendant community? This study reveals that Clemson University’s negligence and cultural erasure during the 20th century has in the present day given way to an institutional commitment to truth-telling brought on by student activism and concerns about long-standing social inequities. The recovery of the AABG aligns with and contributes to work on “Black Geographies” and “Black Landscapes” (Woods, 2000; McKittrick & Woods, 2007; Boone, 2020; Hood 2020). The study examines the national reckoning among universities as they consider the legacy of slavery at their institutions and navigate justice (Wilder, 2014; Harris, et al., 2019). This research draws upon the author’s larger study on South Carolina’s landscape legacy and the synthesis of novel typologies beyond the normative classification of cultural landscapes (Padua, 2020). The commemoration of the AABG on campus is explored as a potential “reconciliatory landscape” conceptualized through the lens of “retrospective justice” drawn from the human rights literature (Russell, 2003; Roth, 2004). Status-quo attitudes are questioned as disruption to the norm instigates change and asserts social justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Journal
Landscape Journal ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The mission of landscape architecture is supported by research and theory in many fields. Landscape Journal offers in-depth exploration of ideas and challenges that are central to contemporary design, planning, and teaching. Besides scholarly features, Landscape Journal also includes editorial columns, creative work, reviews of books, conferences, technology, and exhibitions. Landscape Journal digs deeper into the field by providing articles from: • landscape architects • geographers • architects • planners • artists • historians • ecologists • poets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信