过度消耗精力:在授权品牌时,如何平衡潜在盈利能力和品牌保护

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Annika Meschnig, Carolin Decker-Lange, Anna Dubiel
{"title":"过度消耗精力:在授权品牌时,如何平衡潜在盈利能力和品牌保护","authors":"Annika Meschnig, Carolin Decker-Lange, Anna Dubiel","doi":"10.1108/ejm-01-2021-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDrawing on transaction cost economics, the authors conceptualise brand licensing as a form of alliance. Its performance may be affected by a licensee’s potential opportunism resulting from an imbalance of specific investments in brand-building prior to signing the licensing agreement. From the licensor’s perspective, brand licensing represents a trade-off between brand protection and additional revenues. This study aims to examine how this trade-off shapes licensors’ evaluations of the attractiveness of brand licensing opportunities.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn a vignette study, 121 brand licensing professionals evaluated the attractiveness of up to eight hypothetical brand licensing opportunities with different levels of risk and profitability.\n\n\nFindings\nFrom a licensor’s perspective, high brand quality and distribution risks decrease the attractiveness of a licensing opportunity, although the latter risks are more pronounced. High potential profitability has a positive and significant effect on attractiveness.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe risks outlined in this study refer to licensee behaviour. The licensor may also behave opportunistically. The authors encourage research designs that enable a dyadic evaluation of licensing opportunities because a comparison of a licensor’s and a licensee’s assessments of the same scenario would be illuminating.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings enable the development of an evaluation template that directs brand owners’ attention to the risks and gains of brand licensing opportunities. It supports licensors in choosing the “best” opportunity.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study identifies risks emanating from a licensee’s potential opportunism from a licensor’s perspective. It juxtaposes these risks with the potential profitability of brand licensing opportunities. It is thus one of the first studies to address a licensor’s decision-making trade-offs in a large-scale empirical setting.\n","PeriodicalId":48401,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burning the candle at both ends: how to balance potential profitability and brand protection when licensing brands\",\"authors\":\"Annika Meschnig, Carolin Decker-Lange, Anna Dubiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ejm-01-2021-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nDrawing on transaction cost economics, the authors conceptualise brand licensing as a form of alliance. Its performance may be affected by a licensee’s potential opportunism resulting from an imbalance of specific investments in brand-building prior to signing the licensing agreement. From the licensor’s perspective, brand licensing represents a trade-off between brand protection and additional revenues. This study aims to examine how this trade-off shapes licensors’ evaluations of the attractiveness of brand licensing opportunities.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn a vignette study, 121 brand licensing professionals evaluated the attractiveness of up to eight hypothetical brand licensing opportunities with different levels of risk and profitability.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nFrom a licensor’s perspective, high brand quality and distribution risks decrease the attractiveness of a licensing opportunity, although the latter risks are more pronounced. High potential profitability has a positive and significant effect on attractiveness.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe risks outlined in this study refer to licensee behaviour. The licensor may also behave opportunistically. The authors encourage research designs that enable a dyadic evaluation of licensing opportunities because a comparison of a licensor’s and a licensee’s assessments of the same scenario would be illuminating.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings enable the development of an evaluation template that directs brand owners’ attention to the risks and gains of brand licensing opportunities. It supports licensors in choosing the “best” opportunity.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study identifies risks emanating from a licensee’s potential opportunism from a licensor’s perspective. It juxtaposes these risks with the potential profitability of brand licensing opportunities. It is thus one of the first studies to address a licensor’s decision-making trade-offs in a large-scale empirical setting.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":48401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Marketing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-01-2021-0016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-01-2021-0016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的借鉴交易成本经济学,将品牌授权概念化为一种联盟形式。在签署许可协议之前,被许可方在品牌建设方面的具体投资不平衡,可能会导致潜在的机会主义,从而影响其业绩。从授权方的角度来看,品牌授权代表了品牌保护和额外收入之间的权衡。本研究旨在检视这种权衡如何影响授权人对品牌授权机会吸引力的评估。在一项小型研究中,121名品牌授权专业人士评估了多达8个假设的品牌授权机会的吸引力,这些机会具有不同的风险和盈利水平。从授权方的角度来看,高品牌质量和分销风险降低了授权机会的吸引力,尽管后者的风险更为明显。高潜在盈利能力对企业吸引力有显著的正向影响。研究限制/意义本研究概述的风险是指持牌人的行为。许可方也可能表现得机会主义。作者鼓励能够对许可机会进行二元评估的研究设计,因为比较许可方和被许可方对同一情景的评估将具有启发性。实际意义研究结果有助于开发一个评估模板,引导品牌所有者关注品牌许可机会的风险和收益。它支持授权方选择“最佳”机会。原创性/价值本研究从许可方的角度确定了被许可方潜在的机会主义所带来的风险。它将这些风险与品牌授权机会的潜在盈利能力并列。因此,这是在大规模实证环境中解决许可人决策权衡的首批研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Burning the candle at both ends: how to balance potential profitability and brand protection when licensing brands
Purpose Drawing on transaction cost economics, the authors conceptualise brand licensing as a form of alliance. Its performance may be affected by a licensee’s potential opportunism resulting from an imbalance of specific investments in brand-building prior to signing the licensing agreement. From the licensor’s perspective, brand licensing represents a trade-off between brand protection and additional revenues. This study aims to examine how this trade-off shapes licensors’ evaluations of the attractiveness of brand licensing opportunities. Design/methodology/approach In a vignette study, 121 brand licensing professionals evaluated the attractiveness of up to eight hypothetical brand licensing opportunities with different levels of risk and profitability. Findings From a licensor’s perspective, high brand quality and distribution risks decrease the attractiveness of a licensing opportunity, although the latter risks are more pronounced. High potential profitability has a positive and significant effect on attractiveness. Research limitations/implications The risks outlined in this study refer to licensee behaviour. The licensor may also behave opportunistically. The authors encourage research designs that enable a dyadic evaluation of licensing opportunities because a comparison of a licensor’s and a licensee’s assessments of the same scenario would be illuminating. Practical implications The findings enable the development of an evaluation template that directs brand owners’ attention to the risks and gains of brand licensing opportunities. It supports licensors in choosing the “best” opportunity. Originality/value This study identifies risks emanating from a licensee’s potential opportunism from a licensor’s perspective. It juxtaposes these risks with the potential profitability of brand licensing opportunities. It is thus one of the first studies to address a licensor’s decision-making trade-offs in a large-scale empirical setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: The EJM is receptive to all areas of research which are relevant to marketing academic research, some examples are: ■Sustainability and ethical issues in marketing ■Consumer behaviour ■Advertising and branding issues ■Sales management and personal selling ■Methodology and metatheory of marketing research ■International and export marketing ■Services marketing ■New product development and innovation ■Retailing and distribution ■Macromarketing and societal issues ■Pricing and economic decision making in marketing ■Marketing models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信