国家公园协同管理的跨国比较研究

Q1 Environmental Science
I. B. Adewumi, Carolin Funck, Van Hoang Nguyen, Rie Usui
{"title":"国家公园协同管理的跨国比较研究","authors":"I. B. Adewumi, Carolin Funck, Van Hoang Nguyen, Rie Usui","doi":"10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PARKS-25-1IBA.EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National Parks (NPs) are established with the aim of protecting important natural environments. However, numerous conflicts have emerged due to the introduction of park rules restricting local communities from utilising resources within national parks. The aim of this paper is to examine ways in which national parks in various nations employ the collaboration of stakeholders in park management and conflict resolution by focusing on four countries: Germany, Japan, Nigeria and Vietnam. A review of literature available in multiple languages, analysis of administrative documents and informal interview were the methods adopted. We show that challenges hindering comanagement in the four countries range from unclear responsibilities of various actors, to weak institutionalised framework, and centralisation of park management. The result implicates that each country can learn different techniques of co-management from other countries, leading to more productive approaches towards national park management and conflict resolution in and around national parks.","PeriodicalId":37571,"journal":{"name":"Parks","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross‐national comparative study on collaborative management of national parks\",\"authors\":\"I. B. Adewumi, Carolin Funck, Van Hoang Nguyen, Rie Usui\",\"doi\":\"10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PARKS-25-1IBA.EN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"National Parks (NPs) are established with the aim of protecting important natural environments. However, numerous conflicts have emerged due to the introduction of park rules restricting local communities from utilising resources within national parks. The aim of this paper is to examine ways in which national parks in various nations employ the collaboration of stakeholders in park management and conflict resolution by focusing on four countries: Germany, Japan, Nigeria and Vietnam. A review of literature available in multiple languages, analysis of administrative documents and informal interview were the methods adopted. We show that challenges hindering comanagement in the four countries range from unclear responsibilities of various actors, to weak institutionalised framework, and centralisation of park management. The result implicates that each country can learn different techniques of co-management from other countries, leading to more productive approaches towards national park management and conflict resolution in and around national parks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parks\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PARKS-25-1IBA.EN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PARKS-25-1IBA.EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

国家公园(NPs)的建立是为了保护重要的自然环境。然而,由于限制当地社区利用国家公园内资源的公园规则的引入,出现了许多冲突。本文的目的是通过关注四个国家:德国、日本、尼日利亚和越南,研究各国国家公园在公园管理和冲突解决中采用利益相关者合作的方式。所采用的方法是审查以多种语文提供的文献、分析行政文件和非正式面谈。我们发现,在这四个国家,阻碍公园管理的挑战包括各种行为者的责任不明确、制度化框架薄弱以及公园管理的集中化。结果表明,每个国家都可以从其他国家学习不同的共同管理技术,从而为国家公园管理和解决国家公园内外的冲突提供更有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A cross‐national comparative study on collaborative management of national parks
National Parks (NPs) are established with the aim of protecting important natural environments. However, numerous conflicts have emerged due to the introduction of park rules restricting local communities from utilising resources within national parks. The aim of this paper is to examine ways in which national parks in various nations employ the collaboration of stakeholders in park management and conflict resolution by focusing on four countries: Germany, Japan, Nigeria and Vietnam. A review of literature available in multiple languages, analysis of administrative documents and informal interview were the methods adopted. We show that challenges hindering comanagement in the four countries range from unclear responsibilities of various actors, to weak institutionalised framework, and centralisation of park management. The result implicates that each country can learn different techniques of co-management from other countries, leading to more productive approaches towards national park management and conflict resolution in and around national parks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parks
Parks Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: We aim for PARKS to be a rigorous, challenging publication with high academic credibility and standing. But at the same time the journal is and should remain primarily a resource for people actively involved in establishing and managing protected areas, under any management category or governance type. We aim for the majority of papers accepted to include practical management information. We also work hard to include authors who are involved in management but do not usually find the time to report the results of their research and experience to a wider audience. We welcome submissions from people whose written English is imperfect as long as they have interesting research to report, backed up by firm evidence, and are happy to work with authors to develop papers for the journal. PARKS is published with the aim of strengthening international collaboration in protected area development and management by: • promoting understanding of the values and benefits derived from protected areas to governments, communities, visitors, business etc; • ensuring that protected areas fulfil their primary role in nature conservation while addressing critical issues such as ecologically sustainable development, social justice and climate change adaptation and mitigation; • serving as a leading global forum for the exchange of information on issues relating to protected areas, especially learning from case studies of applied ideas; • publishing articles reporting on recent applied research that is relevant to protected area management; • changing and improving protected area management, policy environment and socio-economic benefits through use of information provided in the journal; and • promoting IUCN’s work on protected areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信