奖学金与实践评估中的项目评估标准

Brad R. Watts, R. Castillo, John Akwetey, Dung Pham
{"title":"奖学金与实践评估中的项目评估标准","authors":"Brad R. Watts, R. Castillo, John Akwetey, Dung Pham","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v19i43.825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Program Evaluation Standards that were developed and approved by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation have served as a resource to the broader evaluation field for over four decades. However, little evidence has been collected regarding the extent to which the standards have influenced the field through scholarship or professional practice.\nPurpose: This study seeks to estimate the prevalence of the Program Evaluation Standards in evaluation scholarship and professional practice.\nSetting: Not applicable.\nIntervention: Not applicable.\nResearch Design: The study combines a systematic review of evaluation literature with a survey of American Evaluation Association (AEA) and Canadian Evaluation Society (CES) members.\nData Collection and Analysis: A systematic review of articles published in 14 evaluation-specific journals from 2010 to 2020 was conducted to identify and typify articles citing the standards. Additionally, AEA and CES members were surveyed, with a focus on knowledge and use of the standards. Descriptive analyses are presented to quantify the prevalence of the standards in evaluation scholarship and practice, respectively.\nFindings: The systematic review revealed that 4.48% of the 4,460 articles published in 14 evaluation-specific journals from 2010 to 2020 contained some use of the standards. Survey results show that 53.14% of AEA members and 67.12% of CES members are familiar with the standards and that, among those with knowledge of the standards, most AEA (67.67%) and CES (71.74%) members use them at least “occasionally” in their professional work, education, and scholarship activities.\nKeywords: program evaluation standards; Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation; American Evaluation Association; Canadian Evaluation Society; systematic review; research on evaluation","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Program Evaluation Standards in Evaluation Scholarship and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Brad R. Watts, R. Castillo, John Akwetey, Dung Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.56645/jmde.v19i43.825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Program Evaluation Standards that were developed and approved by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation have served as a resource to the broader evaluation field for over four decades. However, little evidence has been collected regarding the extent to which the standards have influenced the field through scholarship or professional practice.\\nPurpose: This study seeks to estimate the prevalence of the Program Evaluation Standards in evaluation scholarship and professional practice.\\nSetting: Not applicable.\\nIntervention: Not applicable.\\nResearch Design: The study combines a systematic review of evaluation literature with a survey of American Evaluation Association (AEA) and Canadian Evaluation Society (CES) members.\\nData Collection and Analysis: A systematic review of articles published in 14 evaluation-specific journals from 2010 to 2020 was conducted to identify and typify articles citing the standards. Additionally, AEA and CES members were surveyed, with a focus on knowledge and use of the standards. Descriptive analyses are presented to quantify the prevalence of the standards in evaluation scholarship and practice, respectively.\\nFindings: The systematic review revealed that 4.48% of the 4,460 articles published in 14 evaluation-specific journals from 2010 to 2020 contained some use of the standards. Survey results show that 53.14% of AEA members and 67.12% of CES members are familiar with the standards and that, among those with knowledge of the standards, most AEA (67.67%) and CES (71.74%) members use them at least “occasionally” in their professional work, education, and scholarship activities.\\nKeywords: program evaluation standards; Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation; American Evaluation Association; Canadian Evaluation Society; systematic review; research on evaluation\",\"PeriodicalId\":91909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i43.825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i43.825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:40多年来,由教育评估标准联合委员会制定并批准的项目评估标准一直是更广泛的评估领域的资源。然而,很少有证据表明这些标准通过学术或专业实践对该领域产生了多大影响。目的:本研究旨在评估项目评估标准在评估学术和专业实践中的普遍性。设置:不适用。干预:不适用。研究设计:该研究结合了对评估文献的系统回顾和对美国评估协会(AEA)和加拿大评估协会(CES)成员的调查。数据收集和分析:对2010年至2020年在14种特定评估期刊上发表的文章进行了系统回顾,以确定引用标准的文章并对其进行典型化。此外,还对AEA和CES成员进行了调查,重点关注标准的知识和使用情况。描述性分析分别用于量化学术评估和实践评估标准的普遍性。调查结果:系统综述显示,从2010年到2020年,在14种特定评估期刊上发表的4460篇文章中,4.48%的文章使用了该标准。调查结果显示,53.14%的AEA成员和67.12%的CES成员熟悉这些标准,在了解这些标准的人中,大多数AEA(67.67%)和CES(71.74%)成员至少“偶尔”在专业工作、教育和奖学金活动中使用这些标准。关键词:项目评价标准;教育评价标准联合委员会;美国评估协会;加拿大评估协会;系统综述;评价研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Program Evaluation Standards in Evaluation Scholarship and Practice
Background: The Program Evaluation Standards that were developed and approved by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation have served as a resource to the broader evaluation field for over four decades. However, little evidence has been collected regarding the extent to which the standards have influenced the field through scholarship or professional practice. Purpose: This study seeks to estimate the prevalence of the Program Evaluation Standards in evaluation scholarship and professional practice. Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: The study combines a systematic review of evaluation literature with a survey of American Evaluation Association (AEA) and Canadian Evaluation Society (CES) members. Data Collection and Analysis: A systematic review of articles published in 14 evaluation-specific journals from 2010 to 2020 was conducted to identify and typify articles citing the standards. Additionally, AEA and CES members were surveyed, with a focus on knowledge and use of the standards. Descriptive analyses are presented to quantify the prevalence of the standards in evaluation scholarship and practice, respectively. Findings: The systematic review revealed that 4.48% of the 4,460 articles published in 14 evaluation-specific journals from 2010 to 2020 contained some use of the standards. Survey results show that 53.14% of AEA members and 67.12% of CES members are familiar with the standards and that, among those with knowledge of the standards, most AEA (67.67%) and CES (71.74%) members use them at least “occasionally” in their professional work, education, and scholarship activities. Keywords: program evaluation standards; Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation; American Evaluation Association; Canadian Evaluation Society; systematic review; research on evaluation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信