“赢不了就别玩”:澳大利亚养老金体系中的家庭脱离

IF 3.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
A. Settle
{"title":"“赢不了就别玩”:澳大利亚养老金体系中的家庭脱离","authors":"A. Settle","doi":"10.1080/13563467.2023.2195159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Drawing on the literature on political alienation and insider/outsider theory, this paper offers a novel explanation for the failure of some households to embrace the opportunities for financial control offered by the pension system. The analysis uses data from a financial diaries study to construct objective and subjective measures of attitudes, engagement and distributional outcomes for individual households in the Australian pension system. By showing that households that are systematically disadvantaged in the pension system not only are much more likely to be disengaged but have much stronger convictions about unfairness in the system, the findings link disengagement to alienation. The analysis thus proposes that some households reject the system of individualised accounts by disengaging – like ‘outsiders’ reject the political system by abstaining from voting – because they see the system as stacked against them. Drawing on the alienation literature’s analysis of disengagement with political responsibilities of citizenship, the article thus extends the analysis of disengagement to newer financial responsibilities of citizenship.","PeriodicalId":51447,"journal":{"name":"New Political Economy","volume":"28 1","pages":"849 - 864"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Don’t play if you can’t win’: household disengagement in the Australian pension system\",\"authors\":\"A. Settle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13563467.2023.2195159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Drawing on the literature on political alienation and insider/outsider theory, this paper offers a novel explanation for the failure of some households to embrace the opportunities for financial control offered by the pension system. The analysis uses data from a financial diaries study to construct objective and subjective measures of attitudes, engagement and distributional outcomes for individual households in the Australian pension system. By showing that households that are systematically disadvantaged in the pension system not only are much more likely to be disengaged but have much stronger convictions about unfairness in the system, the findings link disengagement to alienation. The analysis thus proposes that some households reject the system of individualised accounts by disengaging – like ‘outsiders’ reject the political system by abstaining from voting – because they see the system as stacked against them. Drawing on the alienation literature’s analysis of disengagement with political responsibilities of citizenship, the article thus extends the analysis of disengagement to newer financial responsibilities of citizenship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"849 - 864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2023.2195159\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2023.2195159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文借鉴了有关政治异化和内部人/外部人理论的文献,为一些家庭未能抓住养老金制度提供的财务控制机会提供了一个新颖的解释。该分析使用财务日记研究的数据,构建了澳大利亚养老金体系中个体家庭态度、参与度和分配结果的客观和主观衡量标准。研究结果表明,在养老金制度中处于系统性弱势的家庭不仅更有可能脱离社会,而且对制度中的不公平有更坚定的信念,从而将脱离社会与异化联系起来。因此,分析表明,一些家庭通过脱离来拒绝个性化账户制度,就像“局外人”通过弃权来拒绝政治制度一样,因为他们认为这个制度对他们不利。本文借鉴异化文学对脱离公民政治责任的分析,从而将脱离公民政治义务的分析扩展到新的公民经济责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Don’t play if you can’t win’: household disengagement in the Australian pension system
ABSTRACT Drawing on the literature on political alienation and insider/outsider theory, this paper offers a novel explanation for the failure of some households to embrace the opportunities for financial control offered by the pension system. The analysis uses data from a financial diaries study to construct objective and subjective measures of attitudes, engagement and distributional outcomes for individual households in the Australian pension system. By showing that households that are systematically disadvantaged in the pension system not only are much more likely to be disengaged but have much stronger convictions about unfairness in the system, the findings link disengagement to alienation. The analysis thus proposes that some households reject the system of individualised accounts by disengaging – like ‘outsiders’ reject the political system by abstaining from voting – because they see the system as stacked against them. Drawing on the alienation literature’s analysis of disengagement with political responsibilities of citizenship, the article thus extends the analysis of disengagement to newer financial responsibilities of citizenship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: New Political Economy aims to create a forum for work which combines the breadth of vision which characterised the classical political economy of the nineteenth century with the analytical advances of twentieth century social science. It seeks to represent the terrain of political economy scholarship across different disciplines, emphasising original and innovative work which explores new approaches and methodologies, and addresses core debates and issues of historical and contemporary relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信