引入配体-受体相互作用对接得分差异与相似性的二维图

Q4 Environmental Science
Mohammad Rizki Fadhil Pratama, H. Poerwono, Siswandono Siswodihardjo
{"title":"引入配体-受体相互作用对接得分差异与相似性的二维图","authors":"Mohammad Rizki Fadhil Pratama, H. Poerwono, Siswandono Siswodihardjo","doi":"10.22146/IJBIOTECH.62194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observation of molecular docking results was generally performed by analyzing the docking score and the interacting amino acid residues separately either in tables or graphs. Sometimes it was not easy to rank the tested ligands’ docking results, especially if there were many ligands. This study aims to introduce a new way to analyze docking results with a two‐dimensional graph between the difference in docking score and the similarity of ligand‐receptor interactions. Molecular docking was performed with one reference ligand and several test ligands. The docking score difference was obtained between the test and the reference ligands as the graph’s x‐axis. Meanwhile, the y‐axis contains the similarity of ligand‐receptor interactions, obtained from the ratio of amino acid residues and the types of interactions between the test and reference ligands. Docking result analysis was more straightforward because two critical parameters were presented in one graph. This graph could be used to support the analysis of the docking results.","PeriodicalId":13452,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology","volume":"26 1","pages":"54-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing a two‐dimensional graph of docking score difference vs. similarity of ligand‐receptor interactions\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Rizki Fadhil Pratama, H. Poerwono, Siswandono Siswodihardjo\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/IJBIOTECH.62194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Observation of molecular docking results was generally performed by analyzing the docking score and the interacting amino acid residues separately either in tables or graphs. Sometimes it was not easy to rank the tested ligands’ docking results, especially if there were many ligands. This study aims to introduce a new way to analyze docking results with a two‐dimensional graph between the difference in docking score and the similarity of ligand‐receptor interactions. Molecular docking was performed with one reference ligand and several test ligands. The docking score difference was obtained between the test and the reference ligands as the graph’s x‐axis. Meanwhile, the y‐axis contains the similarity of ligand‐receptor interactions, obtained from the ratio of amino acid residues and the types of interactions between the test and reference ligands. Docking result analysis was more straightforward because two critical parameters were presented in one graph. This graph could be used to support the analysis of the docking results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"54-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/IJBIOTECH.62194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/IJBIOTECH.62194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

分子对接结果的观察通常通过在表格或图表中分别分析对接得分和相互作用的氨基酸残基来进行。有时,对测试配体的对接结果进行排序并不容易,尤其是在有许多配体的情况下。这项研究旨在引入一种新的方法来分析对接结果,用二维图来分析对接得分的差异和配体-受体相互作用的相似性。用一个参考配体和几个测试配体进行分子对接。测试和参考配体之间的对接得分差异如图的x轴所示。同时,y轴包含配体-受体相互作用的相似性,从氨基酸残基的比例以及测试配体和参考配体之间的相互作用类型中获得。对接结果分析更简单,因为两个关键参数显示在一张图中。该图可用于支持对接结果的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introducing a two‐dimensional graph of docking score difference vs. similarity of ligand‐receptor interactions
Observation of molecular docking results was generally performed by analyzing the docking score and the interacting amino acid residues separately either in tables or graphs. Sometimes it was not easy to rank the tested ligands’ docking results, especially if there were many ligands. This study aims to introduce a new way to analyze docking results with a two‐dimensional graph between the difference in docking score and the similarity of ligand‐receptor interactions. Molecular docking was performed with one reference ligand and several test ligands. The docking score difference was obtained between the test and the reference ligands as the graph’s x‐axis. Meanwhile, the y‐axis contains the similarity of ligand‐receptor interactions, obtained from the ratio of amino acid residues and the types of interactions between the test and reference ligands. Docking result analysis was more straightforward because two critical parameters were presented in one graph. This graph could be used to support the analysis of the docking results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology
Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信