阅读关系:肯尼亚和南非

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
G. Musila
{"title":"阅读关系:肯尼亚和南非","authors":"G. Musila","doi":"10.4314/eia.v49i3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through a self-reflexive mode, this essay explores a set of reading experiences using Italo Calvino’s perspectives on reading classics, and Tony Bennett’s theorisation of reading formations. Calvino prioritises the text as a stable object with inherent capacity to generate different reading experiences, while Bennett insists on the text’s multiplicity. What is clear from both scholars is that reading is a highly contested practice: who reads, what they read, when they read, how they read, what meanings they derive from reading, what meanings they should or shouldn’t derive from reading are concerns that have historically swirled around reading, in many cultural contexts. In this essay, I offer snapshots of the patterns these concerns have taken in my reading experience as a variously untutored, tutored, youthful and adult reader in Kenya and South Africa; both locations being discursively laden with ideological views on literature and its political labour. The essay surfaces the contradictions that flow through the English and Kiswahili narratives I read, their enmeshment in these ideological contestations and their imprint on my reading experiences across the tutored-untutored continuum.","PeriodicalId":41428,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH IN AFRICA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading relations: Kenya and South Africa\",\"authors\":\"G. Musila\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/eia.v49i3.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through a self-reflexive mode, this essay explores a set of reading experiences using Italo Calvino’s perspectives on reading classics, and Tony Bennett’s theorisation of reading formations. Calvino prioritises the text as a stable object with inherent capacity to generate different reading experiences, while Bennett insists on the text’s multiplicity. What is clear from both scholars is that reading is a highly contested practice: who reads, what they read, when they read, how they read, what meanings they derive from reading, what meanings they should or shouldn’t derive from reading are concerns that have historically swirled around reading, in many cultural contexts. In this essay, I offer snapshots of the patterns these concerns have taken in my reading experience as a variously untutored, tutored, youthful and adult reader in Kenya and South Africa; both locations being discursively laden with ideological views on literature and its political labour. The essay surfaces the contradictions that flow through the English and Kiswahili narratives I read, their enmeshment in these ideological contestations and their imprint on my reading experiences across the tutored-untutored continuum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH IN AFRICA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH IN AFRICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/eia.v49i3.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH IN AFRICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/eia.v49i3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文运用卡尔维诺的经典阅读观和班尼特的阅读形态理论,通过自我反思的方式,探讨了一套阅读体验。卡尔维诺认为文本是一种稳定的客体,具有产生不同阅读体验的内在能力,而贝内特则坚持文本的多样性。两位学者都清楚地表明,阅读是一种高度争议的行为:谁阅读,读什么,什么时候阅读,如何阅读,从阅读中获得什么意义,应该或不应该从阅读中获得什么意义,这些都是在许多文化背景下围绕阅读展开的历史问题。在这篇文章中,我提供了这些问题在我的阅读经历中所采取的模式的快照,作为肯尼亚和南非的各种未经辅导,辅导,年轻和成年读者;这两个地方都充斥着关于文学及其政治劳动的意识形态观点。这篇文章揭示了我读过的英语和斯瓦希里语叙事中存在的矛盾,它们与这些意识形态争论的纠缠,以及它们在我的阅读经历中留下的印记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reading relations: Kenya and South Africa
Through a self-reflexive mode, this essay explores a set of reading experiences using Italo Calvino’s perspectives on reading classics, and Tony Bennett’s theorisation of reading formations. Calvino prioritises the text as a stable object with inherent capacity to generate different reading experiences, while Bennett insists on the text’s multiplicity. What is clear from both scholars is that reading is a highly contested practice: who reads, what they read, when they read, how they read, what meanings they derive from reading, what meanings they should or shouldn’t derive from reading are concerns that have historically swirled around reading, in many cultural contexts. In this essay, I offer snapshots of the patterns these concerns have taken in my reading experience as a variously untutored, tutored, youthful and adult reader in Kenya and South Africa; both locations being discursively laden with ideological views on literature and its political labour. The essay surfaces the contradictions that flow through the English and Kiswahili narratives I read, their enmeshment in these ideological contestations and their imprint on my reading experiences across the tutored-untutored continuum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ENGLISH IN AFRICA
ENGLISH IN AFRICA LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信