相对主义者蔑视智慧

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
G. Andrade
{"title":"相对主义者蔑视智慧","authors":"G. Andrade","doi":"10.46469/MQ.2020.60.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relativism is the doctrine that rejects universal standards of cross-cultural comparisons. Ultimately, this implies that there are no universally valid criteria to establish the superiority of one culture over another. As prototypical relativists posit it, this lack of universal, cross-culturally accepted criteria pertains to achievement, knowledge, and moral behavior. Relativism therefore disdains any evaluation of human societies and cultures by such “objective” criteria as economic efficiency, social complexity, ethical standards and conduct, achieved happiness, and creativity. IQ is an important measure that runs counter to relativism, although there are many other possible rankings on the basis of socially valued traits. The very concept of intelligence is therefore rejected, because intelligence establishes hierarchical relations amongst human beings. This article examines relativism in two of its variants, cognitive and moral, and how they relate to concepts of intelligence. It concludes that relativism is an untenable doctrine.","PeriodicalId":45285,"journal":{"name":"MUSICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"60 1","pages":"294-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relativist Disdain for Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"G. Andrade\",\"doi\":\"10.46469/MQ.2020.60.3.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relativism is the doctrine that rejects universal standards of cross-cultural comparisons. Ultimately, this implies that there are no universally valid criteria to establish the superiority of one culture over another. As prototypical relativists posit it, this lack of universal, cross-culturally accepted criteria pertains to achievement, knowledge, and moral behavior. Relativism therefore disdains any evaluation of human societies and cultures by such “objective” criteria as economic efficiency, social complexity, ethical standards and conduct, achieved happiness, and creativity. IQ is an important measure that runs counter to relativism, although there are many other possible rankings on the basis of socially valued traits. The very concept of intelligence is therefore rejected, because intelligence establishes hierarchical relations amongst human beings. This article examines relativism in two of its variants, cognitive and moral, and how they relate to concepts of intelligence. It concludes that relativism is an untenable doctrine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUSICAL QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"294-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUSICAL QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46469/MQ.2020.60.3.2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46469/MQ.2020.60.3.2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相对主义是一种反对跨文化比较的普遍标准的学说。归根结底,这意味着没有普遍有效的标准来确定一种文化相对于另一种文化的优越性。正如典型的相对主义者所认为的那样,这种缺乏普遍的、跨文化接受的标准与成就、知识和道德行为有关。因此,相对主义不屑于以经济效率、社会复杂性、道德标准和行为、获得的幸福感和创造力等“客观”标准来评价人类社会和文化。智商是一个与相对主义背道而驰的重要衡量标准,尽管还有许多其他可能的排名基于社会价值特征。因此,智力的概念本身就被拒绝了,因为智力在人类之间建立了等级关系。本文考察了相对主义的两种变体,认知和道德,以及它们与智力概念的关系。它的结论是相对主义是站不住脚的学说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relativist Disdain for Intelligence
Relativism is the doctrine that rejects universal standards of cross-cultural comparisons. Ultimately, this implies that there are no universally valid criteria to establish the superiority of one culture over another. As prototypical relativists posit it, this lack of universal, cross-culturally accepted criteria pertains to achievement, knowledge, and moral behavior. Relativism therefore disdains any evaluation of human societies and cultures by such “objective” criteria as economic efficiency, social complexity, ethical standards and conduct, achieved happiness, and creativity. IQ is an important measure that runs counter to relativism, although there are many other possible rankings on the basis of socially valued traits. The very concept of intelligence is therefore rejected, because intelligence establishes hierarchical relations amongst human beings. This article examines relativism in two of its variants, cognitive and moral, and how they relate to concepts of intelligence. It concludes that relativism is an untenable doctrine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Musical Quarterly, founded in 1915 by Oscar Sonneck, has long been cited as the premier scholarly musical journal in the United States. Over the years it has published the writings of many important composers and musicologists, including Aaron Copland, Arnold Schoenberg, Marc Blitzstein, Henry Cowell, and Camille Saint-Saens. The journal focuses on the merging areas in scholarship where much of the challenging new work in the study of music is being produced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信