对因果报应的信仰与感知的(但不是实际的)可信度有关

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
How Hwee Ong, A. Evans, R. Nelissen, I. van Beest
{"title":"对因果报应的信仰与感知的(但不是实际的)可信度有关","authors":"How Hwee Ong, A. Evans, R. Nelissen, I. van Beest","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Believers of karma believe in ethical causation where good and bad\n outcomes can be traced to past moral and immoral acts. Karmic belief may\n have important interpersonal consequences. We investigated whether American\n Christians expect more trustworthiness from (and are more likely to trust)\n interaction partners who believe in karma. We conducted an incentivized\n study of the trust game where interaction partners had different beliefs in\n karma and God. Participants expected more trustworthiness from (and were\n more likely to trust) karma believers. Expectations did not match actual\n behavior: karmic belief was not associated with actual trustworthiness.\n These findings suggest that people may use others’ karmic belief as a cue to\n predict their trustworthiness but would err when doing so.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belief in karma is associated with perceived (but not actual)\\n trustworthiness\",\"authors\":\"How Hwee Ong, A. Evans, R. Nelissen, I. van Beest\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1930297500009141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Believers of karma believe in ethical causation where good and bad\\n outcomes can be traced to past moral and immoral acts. Karmic belief may\\n have important interpersonal consequences. We investigated whether American\\n Christians expect more trustworthiness from (and are more likely to trust)\\n interaction partners who believe in karma. We conducted an incentivized\\n study of the trust game where interaction partners had different beliefs in\\n karma and God. Participants expected more trustworthiness from (and were\\n more likely to trust) karma believers. Expectations did not match actual\\n behavior: karmic belief was not associated with actual trustworthiness.\\n These findings suggest that people may use others’ karmic belief as a cue to\\n predict their trustworthiness but would err when doing so.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009141\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

因果报应的信徒相信道德因果关系,好的和坏的结果可以追溯到过去的道德和不道德的行为。业力信仰可能对人际关系产生重要影响。我们调查了美国基督徒是否期望从相信因果报应的互动伙伴那里获得更多的信任(并且更有可能信任)。我们对信任游戏进行了一项激励研究,其中互动伙伴对因果报应和上帝有不同的信仰。参与者期望从业力信徒那里得到更多的信任(也更有可能相信)。期望与实际行为不符:业力信仰与实际可信度无关。这些发现表明,人们可能会用他人的业力信仰作为预测他人可信度的线索,但这样做会出错。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Belief in karma is associated with perceived (but not actual) trustworthiness
Believers of karma believe in ethical causation where good and bad outcomes can be traced to past moral and immoral acts. Karmic belief may have important interpersonal consequences. We investigated whether American Christians expect more trustworthiness from (and are more likely to trust) interaction partners who believe in karma. We conducted an incentivized study of the trust game where interaction partners had different beliefs in karma and God. Participants expected more trustworthiness from (and were more likely to trust) karma believers. Expectations did not match actual behavior: karmic belief was not associated with actual trustworthiness. These findings suggest that people may use others’ karmic belief as a cue to predict their trustworthiness but would err when doing so.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信