屈的阐释方法及其对当代阐释的影响

Lukmanul Hakim, A. Asrizal, Afrizal Nur, Agustiar Agustiar
{"title":"屈的阐释方法及其对当代阐释的影响","authors":"Lukmanul Hakim, A. Asrizal, Afrizal Nur, Agustiar Agustiar","doi":"10.24014/JUSH.V26I2.4577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims at studying the Qur’anic interpretation method and its impact on contemporary interpretation. This is based on the lack of studies on the interpretation of the contemporary Qur’an, like the method of interpreting the Qur’an, typology and so on. Here, the result has found many things that happen in the interpretation method starting from the development of the initial interpretation or the classical period to modern times. From various methods that have developed, there are essentially only four overviews of interpretation methods with their respective advantages and disadvantages. Such methods are inseparable from the scholars who have developed them. If viewed from the sources of interpretation, the interpretation methods are classified into five categories, (a) bil al-ma’tsur, (b) bil al-riwayah, (c) bil al-manqul, (d) bil ra’yi/bil al-dirayah/bil al ma’qul and (e) bil al-izdiwaj (combination). Further, if seen from the method of explanation, they are divided into descriptive method (al-bayani) and comparative method (al maqarin). Referring to the extent of explanation, they are categorized into global method (al-ijmali) and detailed method (al-ithnaby). Lastly, if seen from the target and scientific aspects that are interpreted systematically, they are classified into analytical method (al-tahliliy) and thematic method (al-mawdhu’iy)","PeriodicalId":17770,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QUR’ANIC INTERPRETATION METHOD AND ITS IMPACT ON CONTEMPORARY INTERPRETATION\",\"authors\":\"Lukmanul Hakim, A. Asrizal, Afrizal Nur, Agustiar Agustiar\",\"doi\":\"10.24014/JUSH.V26I2.4577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims at studying the Qur’anic interpretation method and its impact on contemporary interpretation. This is based on the lack of studies on the interpretation of the contemporary Qur’an, like the method of interpreting the Qur’an, typology and so on. Here, the result has found many things that happen in the interpretation method starting from the development of the initial interpretation or the classical period to modern times. From various methods that have developed, there are essentially only four overviews of interpretation methods with their respective advantages and disadvantages. Such methods are inseparable from the scholars who have developed them. If viewed from the sources of interpretation, the interpretation methods are classified into five categories, (a) bil al-ma’tsur, (b) bil al-riwayah, (c) bil al-manqul, (d) bil ra’yi/bil al-dirayah/bil al ma’qul and (e) bil al-izdiwaj (combination). Further, if seen from the method of explanation, they are divided into descriptive method (al-bayani) and comparative method (al maqarin). Referring to the extent of explanation, they are categorized into global method (al-ijmali) and detailed method (al-ithnaby). Lastly, if seen from the target and scientific aspects that are interpreted systematically, they are classified into analytical method (al-tahliliy) and thematic method (al-mawdhu’iy)\",\"PeriodicalId\":17770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ushuluddin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ushuluddin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24014/JUSH.V26I2.4577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24014/JUSH.V26I2.4577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究旨在研究《古兰经》的解读方法及其对当代解读的影响。这是基于缺乏对当代《古兰经》解读的研究,如解读《古兰经的方法》、类型学等。在这里,研究结果发现,从最初的解读或古典时期到现代,解读方法中发生了许多事情。从已经发展起来的各种方法来看,对解释方法的概述基本上只有四种,各有优缺点。这样的方法离不开学者们的发展。如果从解释的来源来看,解释方法分为五类,(a)bil al-ma'tsur,(b)bil al riwayah,(c)bil al-manqul,(d)bil ra'yi/bil al-dirayah/bil al-ma'qul和(e)bil l-izdiwaj(组合)。此外,如果从解释方法来看,它们分为描述性方法(al-bayani)和比较性方法(al-maqarin)。根据解释的程度,它们分为全局方法(al-ijmali)和详细方法(al-ithnaby)。最后,如果从系统解释的目标和科学方面来看,它们可以分为分析方法(al-tahliliy)和主题方法(al-mawdhu'iy)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
QUR’ANIC INTERPRETATION METHOD AND ITS IMPACT ON CONTEMPORARY INTERPRETATION
This research aims at studying the Qur’anic interpretation method and its impact on contemporary interpretation. This is based on the lack of studies on the interpretation of the contemporary Qur’an, like the method of interpreting the Qur’an, typology and so on. Here, the result has found many things that happen in the interpretation method starting from the development of the initial interpretation or the classical period to modern times. From various methods that have developed, there are essentially only four overviews of interpretation methods with their respective advantages and disadvantages. Such methods are inseparable from the scholars who have developed them. If viewed from the sources of interpretation, the interpretation methods are classified into five categories, (a) bil al-ma’tsur, (b) bil al-riwayah, (c) bil al-manqul, (d) bil ra’yi/bil al-dirayah/bil al ma’qul and (e) bil al-izdiwaj (combination). Further, if seen from the method of explanation, they are divided into descriptive method (al-bayani) and comparative method (al maqarin). Referring to the extent of explanation, they are categorized into global method (al-ijmali) and detailed method (al-ithnaby). Lastly, if seen from the target and scientific aspects that are interpreted systematically, they are classified into analytical method (al-tahliliy) and thematic method (al-mawdhu’iy)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信